Log analysis program running under apache reboots server!

2000-11-13 Thread Nicole Harrington
Greetings all.. I have been trying to test an apache log analizing program called Nettracker (.sane.com) the program seems nice except for the fact that it keeps rebooting/crashing the server. This would just be labeled crappy software except for the fact that I am running the software

Re: linux expo san jose tomorrow

2000-08-14 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 15-Aug-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> hey, is there gonna be a freebsd or bsd booth there tomorrow >> in san jose for that linux expo thing? I may go if there is >> a bsd booth... > > There will be a BSDi booth at the show. Look for the usual black > monolith with the daemon on it. > > -

Re: /tmp on a ramdisk?

2000-08-11 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 30-Jul-00 Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > The issue is that mount_mfs is simply newfs with a catch: it > constructs the new filesystem completely in memory and lives on as > the storage for the mounted filesystem. If you view the processes on > a system using MFS, you will notice that one

Re: How many files can I put in one diretory?

2000-06-22 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 23-Jun-00 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 23-Jun-00 Nicole Harrington. wrote: >> > Yeah.. This is why databases where invented :) >> Hey I agree... However even if the html was databased.. (working on that >> now) >> the custom graphics cannot be. (yet

Re: How many files can I put in one diretory?

2000-06-22 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 22-Jun-00 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > On 22-Jun-00 Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> that sounds insane! Because a name is a name, why dont they call >> those files xx/yy/zz/tt.html and the like, to get down to a more >> reasonable # of files per directory. >> >> Or use a single file and a cgi which

Re: How many files can I put in one diretory?

2000-06-22 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 22-Jun-00 Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >> Hello >> I have a user who needs to store a large amount of small html files. Like >> around 2 million... > > that sounds insane! Because a name is a name, why dont they call > those files xx/yy/zz/tt.html and the like, to get down to a more > reasonable

How many files can I put in one diretory?

2000-06-21 Thread Nicole Harrington.
Hello I have a user who needs to store a large amount of small html files. Like around 2 million... Assuming FreeBSD 4.0-Stable with Soft Updates, what is a sane number that can be handled per directory? Thanks!! Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] |\ __ /| (`

BAFUG DNS

2000-06-14 Thread Nicole Harrington.
Is anybody on right now that has access to cdrom.com DNS servers? Thanks Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] |\ __ /| (`\ http://www.unixgirl.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | o_o |__ ) ) http://www.dangermouse.org/ /

Re: Comments on Athlon [motherboards] sought.. BAD ASUS Story

2000-06-09 Thread Nicole Harrington.
Sad to say.. I have another bad experience with the NEW asus K7A MB. It will not allow a Mylex AccellRaid 150 to break out of the bootup sequence to be configured. :( Ad that to the new BIOS that won't allow keyboardless reboots :( These came in a RED box. Nicole On 09-Jun-00 Wilko Bu

Re: Comments on Athlon [motherboards] sought..

2000-06-08 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 08-Jun-00 Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Nicole Harrington. wrote: >> >> On 08-Jun-00 Wilko Bulte wrote: >> > I'm considering buying an Athlon based machine. Before shelling out the >> > $ (well, fl ) I'd like to know what experiences have with A

RE: Comments on Athlon [motherboards] sought..

2000-06-08 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 08-Jun-00 Wilko Bulte wrote: > I'm considering buying an Athlon based machine. Before shelling out the > $ (well, fl ) I'd like to know what experiences have with Athlon and > FreeBSD. And obviously which mom boards to prefer or keep away from. > > Thks > Wilko I have good experiences so fa

www. Freebsd.org Down??

2000-05-05 Thread Nicole Harrington.
www.freebsd.org down? Figured this would be the best place to port... 4 bordercore2-serial0-0-0-0.SanFrancisco.cw.net (166.48.15.249) 8.031 ms 7.956 ms 7.825 ms 5 core9.SanFrancisco.cw.net (204.70.9.81) 8.411 ms 8.470 ms 8.537 ms 6 204.70.10.105 (204.70.10.105) 10.610 ms 9.874

Re: ILOVEYOU

2000-05-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 04-May-00 Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: >> "or some gay trojan written" >> >>EXCUSE ME? > > Infinite apologies if I offended you. Were I live, the word gay is used > quite often to describe things that are foolish or weak. I didn't mean to > offend the homosexual community, simply to express

Re: ILOVEYOU

2000-05-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 04-May-00 Marc Nicholas wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 May 2000, Nicole Harrington. wrote: > >> "or some gay trojan written" >> >>EXCUSE ME? > > Hehe...'gay' means 'silly' to some of us (especially Canadians). Nothing >

Re: ILOVEYOU

2000-05-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
"or some gay trojan written" EXCUSE ME? Nicole On 04-May-00 Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: >> Umm... >> >> This was just sent to the list. I guess Window's users may want to watch >> out... > > > HAHAHHAHAH. I just opened it with my VBScripting disabled, and read the > code. It's pretty

Re: ILOVEYOU

2000-05-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 04-May-00 Alexander Langer wrote: > Thus spake Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> The 'virus' is the warning message itself, silly! > > Nope, ILOVEYOU is a real virus. > > It's quite funny. Here in Germany even the radio reported about it, it > seems to have crashed MANY companies

Re: 4.0-STABLE?

2000-04-05 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 05-Apr-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> Yup.. however if you use.. >> " pkg_add ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CVSup/cvsupit.tgz " >> >> It does not use it... It just asks questions.. Problem is (with 4.0 now >> being in the stable branch, that it now asks the wrong questions.. > > Mea c

Re: 4.0-STABLE?

2000-04-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 05-Apr-00 Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > "Nicole Harrington." wrote: >> >> Heh... I tried to CVSUP to 4.0-STABLE and mistakenly chose 4.0-current in >> the >> pkg_setup... I wound up with a very nice 5.0-CURRENT machine... Chose 3.X >> and >>

RE: 4.0-STABLE?

2000-04-04 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 04-Apr-00 Ted Sikora wrote: > I wanted to upgrade several production servers to 4.0 and follow the > stable branch. Has 4.0-STABLE been established yet or is stable still > RELENG_3? I planned on installing 4.0-RELEASE and then using CVSup with > RELENG_4. > > -- > Ted Sikora > Jtl Developme

Re: Recommended addition to FAQ (Troubleshooting)

2000-02-18 Thread Nicole Harrington.
On 18-Feb-00 Darryl Okahata wrote: > "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I've used all kinds of software memory checkers, from "CheckIt" to >> highly proprietary packages that cost even more money, and the only >> thing they managed to convince me of is that swapping in known-goo