tand the language :-(
First and foremost, please don't remove the mailing list from the CC
line; others need to know the technical details.
I don't have an answer for you, however. Nate Lawson might have some
ideas as to what's going on. A verbose boot may be needed. I'
Warner Losh wrote:
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [patch] enhance powerd(8) to handle max temperature
> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:08:33 -0700
>
>> M. Warner Losh wrote:
>>> I keep getting the system shutting down on my HP by FreeBSD becaus
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> : >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:31:33 +0200
> : >>>>>> Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:31:33 +0200
>> Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> gahr> My patch is really just a first draft that I wrote in order to have
> gahr> feedbacks on the general idea to implement a temperature controlling
> gahr> system inside powerd, and
Can you and the reboot failure people try:
sysctl debug.acpi.do_powerstate=0
-Nate
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Pietro Cerutti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:46 PM
>> > To: Moore, Robert
>> > Cc: Nate Lawso
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> Hi Lists,
> first off, sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not subscribed to
> freebsd-acpi@, so acpi guys please CC me.
>
> The problem here is that my laptop doesn't power off when issuing halt
> -p or shutdown -p now.
> This is the machine:
> http://www.msicomputer.com/NB/p
[mailing list changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Anderson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Agree 100%. While having it in usermode means there are boundary
crossings that increase per-transaction latency, the actual bulk
data transfer is
Scott Long wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Agree 100%. While having it in usermode means there are boundary
crossings that increase per-transaction latency, the actual bulk data
transfer is via zero-copy IO and you should be able to exceed the
data transfer rates of several
Scott Long wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Nate Lawson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
I'm curious about whether a target mode device would use the buffer
cache or not. Here's a scenario:
Host A: has fibre channel host adapter, in target mode, large memory
pool, and another fiber ch
Eric Anderson wrote:
I'm curious about whether a target mode device would use the buffer
cache or not. Here's a scenario:
Host A: has fibre channel host adapter, in target mode, large memory
pool, and another fiber channel host adapter connecting to fibre channel
block device.
Host B: Fibre
Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 03/31/05 20:51 John Baldwin said the following:
The problem is that the taskqueue_swi in 4.x doesn't have a thread
context that can be slept on via tsleep(). The fix would be to create
a kthread in which to run the ACPI tasks. 4.x already has one such
kthread for the task
Takanori Watanabe wrote:
Hi, I updated ThinkPad Hotkey driver so that it can
* Read Brightness
* Read Volume
* Read Mute status
* Read Keylight status
* AccessIBM, Zoom Screen(Fn+Sp) toggle.
ToDo lists
* Set Brightness
* Set Volume
* Bluetooth attach/detach.
* Userland worker.
These features will c
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:17:13 -0800
From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 64 bit endian routines
References: <[
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:18:49 -0800
From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 64 b
First, the simple question: what's the simplest cross-platform way of
implementing scsi_ulto4b and scsi_4btoul (/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_all.h) for
64 bit values. GEOM (/sys/geom/geom_enc.c) implements it via a 64 bit
cast in g_enc_le8. Is this the best current way?
Second, anyone done work on unifyi
Followups to hackers@. For those just tuning in, the patch under
discussion is gdb.diff at:
http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I'd appreciate the default being such that when one quits gdb the kernel
> begins running again instead of hanging for w
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nate Lawson writes:
> >I don't mean to be rude but I doubt the utility of this whole
> >plan. dump/restore are done on disk devices which are at least an order
> >of magnitude slower than a syscall boundary crossing. Goi
On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > After the fs has been repaired, the alternate sb is not copied to the
> > default sb (currently).
>
> This doesn't sound valid. It would mean, if your suberblock
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 02:28:00PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >>I've successfully repaired a fs with the superblock backup at 32. Now how
> >>do I copy that backup to the default superblock location? fsck_ffs does
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Michael Ranner wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I have implemented the setattr(), lsetattr() and fsetattr() syscalls for
> 4.7 and 5.0. You can review my code on http://www.ranner.jawa.at/freebsd.php.
>
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
I don't mean to be rude but I doubt the ut
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 02:28:00PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I've successfully repaired a fs with the superblock backup at 32. Now how
> > do I copy that backup to the default superblock location? fsck_ffs does
> >
I've successfully repaired a fs with the superblock backup at 32. Now how
do I copy that backup to the default superblock location? fsck_ffs does
NOT automatically do this.
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Steve Shorter wrote:
> I have been using softupdates on 500G SCSI RAID in production
> for about 1 year, no problems.
>
> $ df /mnt/2d
> Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da2d 523577788 470120524 1157104298%/mnt/2d
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> --- ip_fw.c 21 Nov 2002 01:27:30 - 1.131.2.38
> +++ ip_fw.c 12 Dec 2002 00:43:22 -
> @@ -1573,6 +1573,11 @@
> break;
> }
> default:/* Send an ICMP unreachable using code */
> +
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kyunghwan Kim wrote:
> I've heard that kernel of RELENG_4 branch is single-threaded,
> but can hardly check out if kernel process(thread) like pagedaemon can
> run on other cpu concurrently when another cpu is processing an network
> interrupt. Using Kernel process(thread) for c
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Marc Recht wrote:
> > Every now and this I hear people saying (mostly you :)) that some problems
> > are KVA related or that the KVA must be increased. This makes me a bit
> > curious, since I've never seen problems like that on Linux. It sounds for
> > me
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Rashim Gupta wrote:
> I have a machine to which I remotely log in and do
> kernel programming. It has two kernel versions - one is WORKING and the
> other is TEST - the one I am presently working on. Is it possible that
> the bootloader tries to first load TEST but in case TEST
I'm not a usb expert but I think your patch deserves some comments.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> First, sometimes (especially, if twitching a memory stick out of
> the reader while the device is being detected) a transfer to the
> umass device is initiated *after* the device is already
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I just got hit by a peculiar problem related to out-of-order
> execution of instructions.
> I was doing some low-level timing measurements using the rdtsc()
> around selected pieces of code (the rdtsc() is included in
> the TSTMP() functions that are in REL
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:15:34PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to get some review for t
It has been closed.
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Joseph Scott wrote:
>
> > FreeBSD PR bin/15416 (addr2line is unable to find line
> > numbers) indicates that addr2line appears to be broken. This PR was
> > submitted at the end of 99 when 4
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > As a member of the e2e camp, I'd say that any device which is looking at
> > sequence space is implicitly an endpoint and has to accept the processing
> > limitations as such. MITM devices (load balan
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase
> > > the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence
> > >
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> FWIW: upping the roll-over rate is not a good reason to increase
> the size of fields, unless you want to increase the TCP sequence
> number filed to 64 bits? ...it has exactly the same issues at
> high data rates.
That's what the timestamp option does
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Dirk Froemberg wrote:
> What about CDRIOCGETBLOCKSIZE and CDRIOCSETBLOCKSIZE? Any chance
> to have these ioctl in cd(4)?
>
> This would allow mplayer to play (S)VCD with SCSI cd drives. 8-)
>
> Regards Dirk
I'm open to reviewing a patch that does this if someone wants
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > I'm trying to get some review for the following patch. I realize it's
> > quite large, but most it is is trivial. The ipfw code is the only thing
> > that worries me significantly. I have
HEAD is frozen for the first time in years... Trolls and spammers are on
the rise...
Looks like he picked the wrong week to stop smoking.
-Nate
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Ramshur wrote:
> Hello-
>
> This Thursday is the Great American Smokeout, and after 20 years, I am finally
>quitting smoking. I
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021115 12:17] wrote:
> > :Will the knobs allow one to link /bin and /sbin against full blown
> > :libc? That would be nice as we can then start using pam and user
> > :management in / with dynamic modules (finally
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021114 15:42] wrote:
> > Please see earlier threads on hackers@ about bloat in libc and dynamic
> > linking of /[s]bin. Tim Kientzle submitted a patch that breaks exit's
> > dependenc
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> :
> :In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> :Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :: On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:32:13PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> :: >
> :: > On Wed, 13 Nov 20
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Wes Peters wrote:
> Doug Rabson wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 14 November 2002 6:45 am, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > % make NOSHARED=NO buildworld
> > >
> > > No patches necessary. We do this all the time at work, and it works
> > > fabulously. I do this for disk based sys
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> The possibility of dynamically linking /(s)bin seems
> to recur pretty regularly. As libc continues to grow,
> this idea seems worth revisiting. However, I've come up
> with an alternative that might be worth considering.
I'm open to patches for buildin
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, the evil toor wrote:
> I just followed the recent sio thread, but it did not answer my questions.
> I have a program that needs to set RTS and DTR and then later set them
> again and again.. I could go for the open /dev/io and then the IO adr of
> the serial port.. but as far a
On 6 Nov 2002, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out how to use the bus_dma* functions in the
> DRM. What I'm working on at the moment is the ATI PCIGART. How it
> works right now is an ioctl is done which mallocs a chunk of memory (up
> to 32MB). Later, the ioctl that sets up dma
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> With some minor modifications to disklabel, you can label a 2 Tb disk.
> We've done it with a 1.4Tb disk:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da20a 669G 246G 370G40%/rapraid0
> /
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> As far as PCI goes (or anything they publish, for that matter), the
> MindShare books are very, very good. But for the particular question
> of how much physical address space is eaten, you really have to go to
> the chipset spec. sheets to get the right
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Nate Lawson writes:
> > I've put together a patch that enables a kernel on the target machine to
> > detect a GDB packet and automatically enter GDB mode. When the debugger
> > detaches, it also continues execution.
I've put together a patch that enables a kernel on the target machine to
detect a GDB packet and automatically enter GDB mode. When the debugger
detaches, it also continues execution. This speeds up debugging,
especially when the target is in a remote location. The patch plus more
explanation is
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 03:14:01AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 11:05:29AM +0300, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> > >
> > > you could use send-pr to make the proposed patch visible in the
> > > bug tracking databas
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> The bigger deal is breaking
> the network interface API and ABI which in turn breaks a few user land
> programs that use libkvm ("netstat -r" for exmaple). That's why this is
> a .0 feature.
>
> Thanks,
> Brooks
Please check the libdnet port and possib
You might also try -net or -arch.
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'm trying to get some review for the following patch. I realize it's
> quite large, but most it is is trivial. The ipfw code is the only thing
> that worries me significantly. I have promised Kris that I will fix
> por
Try to figure out where it was in frames 8 and 10 (probably a module).
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ckly determine the correponding source code line?
>
> -Zhihui
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On 29-Oct-2002 Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I remember there is a command
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 29-Oct-2002 Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> >
> > I remember there is a command in either gdb or ddb which enable you to
> > display the stack of a particular process. Can anyone tell me if there is
> > such a command and what the command is? Thanks!
>
> In dd
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Kenneth Culver wrote:
>
> > > I'd probably steer clear of the western digital drives as well. Yes the
> >
> > make that "stear" clear.
>
> Ummm... why? "steer" is a word with multiple meanings. I can't find
> "stear" anywhere.
Mu.
-
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Please review the patch, which adds two new types of events -
> NOTE_STARTEXEC and NOTE_STOPEXEC, that could be used to get
> notification when the image starts or stops executing. For example, it
> could be used to monitor that a daemon is up and running
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Frank C Pilarcik wrote:
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > We have been experiencing intermittent system panics on system intended to
> > handle email and web mail. Neither system load or traffic volume seems to
> > have a bearing on when the panics o
Nice, thanks for doing this. How about some more accurate names for the
userland routines instead of "this_is_swapoff" and "twiddle"?
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:36:39PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > What's the portable way of printing an off_t? It should work on Linux and
> > FreeBSD. Linux seems to recommend casting the off_t to intmax_t which
> > isn'
What's the portable way of printing an off_t? It should work on Linux and
FreeBSD. Linux seems to recommend casting the off_t to intmax_t which
isn't present in FreeBSD. This is in usermode.
Thanks,
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in th
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:32:40PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > How about updating Alpine (alpine.cs.washington.edu) and fixing a lot of
> > its lousy hacks (i.e. the sysinit stuff)?
>
> Nice idea, but a lot of people will/a
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Michel Oosterhof wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Recently I started looking into kqueue(2), and to get to know the
> interface better I attempted to turn usr.sbin/moused into a kqueue
> program (replacing the main select() loop that reads the mouse
> device).
>
> Now I thought I underst
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:56:43PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> >
> > Here there's a mini list of things i would like to work on, tell me
> > which one is available and fell free to add any other project you
> > think could help the FreeBSD community i
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Angelin Lazarov Lalev wrote:
> I think I have a problem. From time to tme, apparently when the disk
> activity of my IBM SCSI disk becomes higher,
> all disk operations are suspended for about 30 seconds. After that all
> continues ok, but the following log messages are writ
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > using a single serial cable I can pass control to the remote kgdb
> > pressing ctl-alt-del at the target host.
> > I'm looking for a means to interrupt the target kernel
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 01:54:08AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I have rewritten the scsi_target driver and usermode client with a much
> > simpler model suggested by Justin Gibbs. The kernel driver receives
>
> This sounds like
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> On Sep 06 at 12:11, Julian Elischer spoke:
>
> > hit CTL_ALT_ESC on it's keyboard...
>
> Doing this on the remote host (running gdb) tells me `No debugger in
> kernel'.
> Doing this on the target host passes control to the remote gdb.
Like it should
I have rewritten the scsi_target driver and usermode client with a much
simpler model suggested by Justin Gibbs. The kernel driver receives
commands in the form of CCBs via write(2) and returns completed CCBs to
usermode via read(2). The included sample client is much simpler as well,
implementi
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:01:15AM +0200, Dan Larsson wrote:
> > While trying to get hardware monitoring to work on my computer I
> > found the below procedure to enable the smbus device.
> > It didn't get me any closer to actually monitoring the hardw
Comments below. Consider them only semi-informed. :)
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> +void
> +tcp_xmit_bandwidth_limit(struct tcpcb *tp, tcp_seq ack_seq)
> +{
> + u_long bw;
> + u_long bwnd;
> + int save_ticks;
> +
> + /*
> + * If inflight_enable is disabled in
It was first supported in 3.3.6 when you load agp.ko.
http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/i810.html
However, I think the recommended config is 4.2.0 for today's agp.ko:
http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.0/i810.html
I had trouble getting 3.3.6 working with any combination of intel/old
linux agp.ko on Lin
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Sean Hamilton wrote:
> Also, forgot to mention, I will need to look inside TCP streams, and know
> which user owns them, and which packets pertain to which TCP stream, which
> is why I was thinking a module would be more suitable. If I did this in user
> space, I'd have to rec
Yes.
sys/cam/scsi/scsi_target*
/usr/share/examples/scsi_target
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Semen A. Ustimenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I beg you all pardon for a question not related directly to FreeBSD, but
> if the answer is ``yes'', then I believe FreeBSD will be in deal.
>
> The question is: "Can I emula
You could start by sending full dmesg and pciconf -l output. You should
also enable ddb and see if you can enter the debugger when the box
freezes. If so, the output of "trace" and "ps" would be useful.
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Yanko Yanez Keller da Costa wrote:
> Just another thing...
> Last week I
On Fri, 5 May 2000, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I am running FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE on x86 with gcc 2.95.2 and the
> > httperf-0.6 port gives a SIGFPE and dumps core when run against a system
> > that has no web server running
(PDT)
From: David Mosberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: patch to httperf-0.6
>>>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 15:37:21 -0700 (PDT), Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Nate> On x86. Your code generates SIGFPE, not SIGB
76 matches
Mail list logo
