Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:18:49 -0800
        From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Cc: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: Re: 64 bit endian routines
        References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:30:58PM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
        > Most of these could probably be implemented in terms of the __bswap*()
        > functions in <machine/endian.h>, except for vendor sources like
        > openssl, and htonl and ntohl which already are.  I'm not sure if there
        > would be an advantage to moving the geom byte ordering functions to
        > <sys/endian.h> (I guess phk didn't either).

        The geom functions serve a primary purpose of dealing with random
        alignment of fields. The endianness has been added later, so they
        now serve a dual function. Do not unify them with byte-order only
        functions.

        -- 
         Marcel Moolenaar         USPA: A-39004          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Both scsi and geom implement unaligned access functions that perform byte
ordering.  I never intended to supplant them with __bswap*().  What I want
is for machine/endian.h to have functions that provide 16-64 bit endian
conversions in both aligned and unaligned access forms.  After these functions
are there, I'd like us to unify use of them and remove driver-private
versions.

Is this more clear now?

-Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to