On Thursday, 28 February 2002 at 11:42:17 +1100, Andrew wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Wilkinson,Alex wrote:
>
>> ie a way to know that the kernel has been updated so I can compile the
>> new one.
>
> cvsup and watch the output is probably easiest.
Note that it's not possible to build a new ke
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 17:03:38 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Wednesday, 20 February 2002 at 16:52:48 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
>
>>> I was talking to Louis Gerbarg about this topic at the BSDCon last
>>> week. Apparently Darwin already has this functionality, so I suppose
>>> you'd like to take a
On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 21:36:25 -0800, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Now that Luigi has put in polling support for some ethernet drivers
> I was wondering how much work it would be to make the remote kernel debugging
> run over the ethernet. I have worked on systems
On Wednesday, 30 January 2002 at 9:41:15 -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> Caldera's License Agreement:
>
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf
Thanks. However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be. It
implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it does
On Tuesday, 29 January 2002 at 15:56:32 -0800, Dion Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:05:20AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:55:04 -0700, Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> And, where have you heard t
- Forwarded message from Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:55:04 -0700
> From: Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
On Monday, 28 January 2002 at 18:34:10 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:49:59AM -0500, Jason Andresen wrote:
>> I'm hoping there is an easy answer to this one...
>>
>> Is there some way vinum can be tickled such that it writes to all disks
>> in a plex at once? For instance
[moved to -chat]
On Monday, 7 January 2002 at 21:21:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 01/07/2002 7:32:36 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>> Drool away, buddy! Here's mine, and it still works (chicklet
>>> keyboard, built in cassette drive, metal fi
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 23:12:40 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Glenn Johnson wrote:
>> It is really hard for me to say if this is FreeBSD specific because I do
>> not tend to stress the system much when I have Linux running. My wife
>> has an identical system running Windows 98SE
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 14:46:12 -0600, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 06:10:09PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> I've been using AMD processors almost exclusively in my main work
>> machines for over 4 years, and I've been very happy with them. I
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 11:57:44 +0100, Nils Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 06:10:09PM +1030, Greg Lehey stood up and spoke:
>> I've been using AMD processors almost exclusively in my main work
>> machines for over 4 years, and I've been very happy wit
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 6:21:04 -0800, Keith Simonsen wrote:
> Greg,
>
> Do not forget to check your power supply make/model. If you search on google
> for AMD's recommended hardware list, double check you're power supply is
> listed for your cpu.
This wouldn't explain why it works fine u
On Friday, 28 December 2001 at 13:23:50 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
>> Information that could be interesting is (here my values):
>>
>> Processor:AMD Duron 850
>> Motherboard: ECS K7VZA
>> Memory:1 128 MB SIMM, 100
I've been using AMD processors almost exclusively in my main work
machines for over 4 years, and I've been very happy with them. I'm
currently running a K6/233, a K6/333, an Athlon 750, a Duron 850 and
an Athlon XP 1700. Last August, though, I bought a machine which gave
me a lot of trouble, the
On Monday, 17 December 2001 at 22:50:45 -, Dave Reyenga wrote:
> How about writing a new filesystem based on UFS?
If it's based on UFS, it's not a new file system.
> This would save all of the hassle that JFS would bring: licensing,
> porting time, etc.
There are no hassles with licensing.
On Sunday, 16 December 2001 at 17:18:37 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
> In article by Greg Lehey:
> [about if and how Caldera is enforcing the Ancient UNIX
>http://www2.caldera.com/offers/ancient.html. Note also
>that in fact they allow access to the code via
>
On Sunday, 16 December 2001 at 18:37:33 +1100, Warren Toomey wrote:
> I would say that FreeBSD already has a nearly-working UFS
> implementation. Also, the structure of UFS is so well documented in
> various books that, even if FreeBSD's UFS implementation was
> deficient, it could be rectified w
On Saturday, 15 December 2001 at 3:18:33 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it's still copyrighted. You need an SCO license; want
>> to go and get one of them? It doesn't cost anything, but I can't give
>> the software
On Saturday, 15 December 2001 at 0:39:32 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> Do you have small images of this FS, as well as header files that
>>> are redistributable (e.g. BSD license) and/or code?
>>>
>>> If you have the tools sources (
On Friday, 14 December 2001 at 6:16:27 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Since JFS has come up again... Are there any papers that explain how
>> to integrate a new filesystem into FreeBSD? The relevant chapter in
>> the FreeBSD Developers' Handbook (16) is a bit terse :-).
>>
On Wednesday, 12 December 2001 at 1:43:10 -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as i said also before, my intentions were never to cause havoc on
> the mailing list. :-)
>
> In simple terms, what i am saying is, the people who would like to
> port the JFS file system, should put a +1 in their next
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 19:42:30 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
>> been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
>> for JFS which would need
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 1:08:23 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
>>> transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
>>> system calls and NFS server code) woul
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:48:58 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> [ ... Hiten wants someone to GPLify FreeBSD ... ]
>
>> I'm glad you took the time to read the marketting literature.
>>
>> The problem is that porting it is going to be a bit more complicated
>> than
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:45:22 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Hiten Pandya wrote:
>> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
>> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
>
> Not unless you have plans. When I was an IBM employee, they would
> not change the license, and so it's i
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 10:56:17 +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 17:39:35 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>>> * Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:02] wrote:
>>>> hi all,
>>>>
>>>> this is a wild i
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Long-short syndrome in first message.
On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 14:01:53 -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
>
> this is a wild idea...suggestion...
>
> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> JFS (Journaled F
On Sunday, 2 December 2001 at 17:53:37 +1030, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 1 December 2001 at 13:05:53 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> It seems Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>I've got a bo
On Saturday, 1 December 2001 at 1:21:04 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
>
>> Julian Elischer wrote:
>>>
>>> I've tried getting information about our (FreeBSD) mail
>>> system by mailing to "postmaster" but no-one answers..
>>>
>>> so, who IS the postmaster
saging).
>
> I have upgraded to 4.4-STABLE, and have hacked in some changes to ata-dma.c
> (provided by Greg Lehey, but I had to do it by hand)
What did you have to do by hand?
> so my drive is now running at UDMA 100.
Can you send me dmesg output? In particular, I had a printf o
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:22:40 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011128 02:14] wrote:
>>
>> If you want me to shutup and go into a corner, it might make you feel
>> better, but it certainly won't solve the real problem.
>
> I made it clear that my pr
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 2:03:21 -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011127 23:08] wrote:
>> I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
>> He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
arallel connections.
>
> The connections hang, abort, and those that complete have numbers that
> are *all* over the map. However, when connected to a Linux box on the
> same network, none of these bad things occur. :(
>
> (And, we've verified the network is up by running ping i
On Wednesday, 28 November 2001 at 1:56:14 -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:41:18 -0700
> "Nate Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> FWIW, I'm seeing this as well. However, this appears to be a new
>> occurance, as we were using a FreeBSD 3.X system for our reference test
I've just been talking with a friend of mine from the Samba team.
He's about to change jobs, and a lot of his work in future will
involve FreeBSD. He's just been doing some performance testing, and
while the numbers are pretty even (since he discovered soft updates
:-), he's noticing some signifi
On Sunday, 11 November 2001 at 22:37:58 +0100, Paul van der Zwan wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Smith wrote:
These "cheap controllers" don't have any algorithms at all to speak of;
they're just ATA controllers with BIOS code that supposedly understands
striping/mirror
On Sunday, 11 November 2001 at 9:33:56 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Mike Smith wrote:
>>> Agreed. I don't think the RAIDs will have the same parameters. Most
>>> of these cheap controllers have fairly simplistic algorithms. Note
>>> that I said "guess", though. In my language, that
On Tuesday, 11 September 2001 at 7:41:06 +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> I reckon if the RAID functions are implemented in HPT BIOS (in software),
>>> I'll be better off with Vinum.
>>
>> Ultimately, all RAID is soft
On Tuesday, 30 October 2001 at 8:26:14 -0800, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
>
> I be stumped:
>
> newsfeed-inn# uname -a
> FreeBSD newsfeed-inn.meganews.com 4.4-STABLE FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Mon Oct 29
>15:08:57 PST 2001
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/n/FreeBSD/RELENG_4-2001-10-29/src/sys/compile/NEWSFEED-INN
On Saturday, 13 October 2001 at 19:08:24 -0400, Rob wrote:
> I am writing this mailing list in a desperate attempt to find out how to
> restore my hdd with out loosing all the data on it. Recently I added two
> additional hard drives to my freebsd 4.2 system. Once I booted up my system
> and dl'
On Wednesday, 3 October 2001 at 12:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I suppose it must have been Peter Penchev who wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:14 AM, Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elisch
On Tuesday, 2 October 2001 at 12:43:54 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>>>
On Sunday, 30 September 2001 at 14:55:58 -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010930 14:35] wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 02:23:26PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> * Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010930 12:55] wrote:
AIX has SIGDANGER.
>>>
>>> Anyone ca
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
Doe
On Sunday, 16 September 2001 at 20:04:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:04:27 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>>> Subdisk home.p0.s0:
>>> Size: 40822392320 bytes (38931 MB)
>>> State: u
On Sunday, 16 September 2001 at 13:00:41 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:42:38 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>>> 6) Supply an extract of the file /var/log/messages.
>>>
>>> Sep 12 14:06:10 depot login: ROOT LOGIN (root) ON ttyv0
>>
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 18:39:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:38:20 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 15 September 2001 at 12:26:10 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 4
On Monday, 10 September 2001 at 10:11:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am trying to install FreeBSD on a (pseudo-) hardware ATA RAID volume which
> consists of two striped ATA disks connected to a Highpoint HPT370
> controller."Pseudo-" because FreeBSD detects the individua
On Wednesday, 1 August 2001 at 0:17:42 +0700, smail wrote:
> Hello freebsd-hackers,
>
> i need some help. my problem is about memory limit in mmap function.
> i can't mmap files infinitely, after some number of file mmaped in
> memory i've got an error, probably causing memory limit of 2 or 4 Gb
On Wednesday, 8 August 2001 at 0:27:23 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> void wrote:
>>> Can you name one SMP OS implementation that uses an
>>> "interrupt threads" approach that doesn't hit a scaling
>>> wall at 4 (or fewer) CPUs, due to heavier weight thread
>>> context switch overhead?
>>
>> Sola
On Tuesday, 7 August 2001 at 1:58:21 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Bosko Milekic wrote:
>>> I keep wondering about the sagicity of running interrupts in
>>> threads... it still seems like an incredibly bad idea to me.
>>>
>>> I guess my major problem with this is that by running in
>>> threads,
On Sunday, 15 July 2001 at 16:51:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> am a kernel newbie. i tried adding code to the kernel
> and compiled it and installed . when i tried rebooting
> my new image the kernel panics with a fatal trap 12:
> page fault ( for which i know the reason). How do i
> boot t
On Thursday, 12 July 2001 at 6:58:09 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Friends
>
> I have some questions about kernel programming:
You'd be better off sending mail like this to -hackers. I've followed
up there.
> 1. Why I can call some system calls functions into the kernel but
>anoth
On Sunday, 8 July 2001 at 15:47:18 -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> Julian Stacey wrote:
>> The sooner BOD appoint a handfull of non-execs, some nominated by core,
>> the sooner it'll be easy to encourage Wind River to donate the trademark,
>> before who knows what might happen at, to, or within W
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Your MUA is a known text mutilator. You'd be better off getting a
UNIX-based MUA:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
On Wednesday, 20 June 2001 at 11:16:18 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROT
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 22:04:34 -0700, Brian W. Buchanan wrote:
> Any fdc driver gurus in the house?
>
> I have a bunch of old floppy disks with some text files I'd like to
> recover. Many of them have errors and are unreadable past a certain point
> in the disk. Others I can't read from a
[redirected to -questions]
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 19:51:05 -0700, Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
>
> These 2 are from running it on each on the ide drives without vinum.
>
> [root@gorbag /mnt1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=16384k count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 16777216000 byt
On Wednesday, 9 May 2001 at 10:40:50 +0530, Jayesh Krishna wrote:
> Hi guys...
> I am comfortable with Linux Device Drivers. Presently I am trying
> to write some pseudo-drivers in FreeBSD(4.2-Release). I tried out
> make_pseudo_driver.sh
> in the /usr/share/examples/drivers but it does not work
On Friday, 4 May 2001 at 12:58:58 -0400, Brad L. Chisholm wrote:
> I sent this to -questions a few days ago, but never received
> any response, so I thought I'd try here. My apologies if you've
> seen this more than once.
>
> I'm also interested in what might be appropriate filesystem
> settings
On Thursday, 19 April 2001 at 10:10:51 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 19-Apr-01 Dennis wrote:
>> I understand there is a language thing, but I went out of my way to say
>> that i wasnt saying that SMP shouldnt be supported. It already is, and its
>> been done very cleanly in a way that doesnt c
On Wednesday, 18 April 2001 at 23:17:06 -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:
>
>>> You think Intel isn't going to market dual/quad ia64 machines?
>>
>> Yes, but who'll need them?
>
> If nobody needed them, what would be the point in SELLING
> them ?
That's never been an
On Saturday, 31 March 2001 at 11:15:37 -0800, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's no need to copy the spammer. Did the message bounce, BTW?
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
> id 8EA6A2E8167; Sat, 3
On Wednesday, 28 March 2001 at 1:40:27 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 9:39:36 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
> This box averages
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 16:38:33 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 16:21] wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 17:59:23 -0500, Brandon Gale wrote:
>>>>> Do you think it'd be worth it to have vinum carp about wha
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 15:15:17 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 05:16:53PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
>> No, there's no requirement for it to be a prime number. The only
>> problem is that with 32 MB cylinder groups and a power of two stripe
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 17:59:23 -0500, Brandon Gale wrote:
>>> Do you think it'd be worth it to have vinum carp about what may
>>> be a non optimal stripe size?
>>>
>>> "Warning N is probably a bad idea for a stripe size, see docs"
>>
>> Only if it can recognize the fact correctly.
>
> How
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 9:39:36 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>>> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
>>> This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Average file size is about 4K
On Tuesday, 27 March 2001 at 0:05:03 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010326 23:47] wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>>> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
>>
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
> This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
>
>
>
> Average file size is about 4K. /home/bbsusers* is on a vinum
> stripe'd volume with 3 Ultra160 9G 1RPM d
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:04:16 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
>>> SWAP is never touched. :)
>>>
>>> last pid: 23395; load averages: 2.08, 2.92, 3.60up 0+01:29:58 02:03:27
>>> 1529 processes:24 running, 1505 sleeping
>>> CPU states: 40.5% user, 0.0% nice, 46.4% system, 1.1% interrupt,
On Friday, 9 March 2001 at 19:37:45 -0500, kaworu wrote:
>
> Perhaps this is not the right place to post this, if so, I apoligize.
This is the correct place. -questions is not.
> But, I have a dilema. Is there any documentation I can find which
> gives the arguments for all kernel space funct
On Monday, 5 March 2001 at 17:23:53 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> What I can't understand is the reference to missing support for large
>> file sizes - as far as I know, that's one of FreeBSD's strengths! Anybody
>> care to guess what they
On Thursday, 22 February 2001 at 13:55:07 -0800, Jim Pirzyk wrote:
>
> I have a question on how to debug Linux binaries. I have a core
> file from the linux binary, but if I use the FreeBSD gdb, it cannot
> find the shared libraries in /compat/linux/ If I use the /compat/linux/
> /usr/bin/gd
On Monday, 12 February 2001 at 15:29:17 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i've been doing some experiments with vinum, and doing a make buildworld
>> (with obj on the same vinum)
>> without soft-updates~ 1 hour
>> with soft-updates
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:16:44 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Andrew Reilly wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 12:13:57PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>> * Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010206 12:07] wrote:
Does sendmail even use fsync()?
>>>
>>> It bette
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:31:26 -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
>
> In anycase, while VINUM is great for striping disks I recommend that
> you use CCD to begin with, because CCD is a whole lot less complex.
> You can stripe IDE drives but the two drives must be on different IDE
>
On Wednesday, 7 February 2001 at 13:41:29 -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> btw ccd requires 2 other drives am i correct?
No, you can use ccd with only 2 drives.
> So i just remove /var/ basically from fstab ...raid0 2 drives together
> and mount that as var...is my basic understanding.
> of course
On Friday, 2 February 2001 at 20:10:10 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
>
>> crw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 78, 0 Dec 31 1969 pci
>
> This one may appear harmless, but it is not. It is trivially easy to create
> an alignment fault (fatal on an alpha) with the userland pcicon
On Sunday, 28 January 2001 at 21:10:34 -0700, Ronald G Minnich wrote:
> I am sorry I brought this up without a URL :-(
>
> I'm working on it.
Garrett Rooney already posted it: http://www.ccrc.wustl.edu/pub/chuck
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address
On Friday, 26 January 2001 at 9:47:38 -0500, Jim Sander wrote:
>>> Linux people avoid the EtherExpress because they think something is
>>> wrong with the card.
>
>> Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B cards in FreeBSD
>
>These cards work well in our many 3.x and 4.x systems.
>
>But I just buil
On Thursday, 25 January 2001 at 22:03:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hey guys i know you probably get this question all the time but i am looking
> into getting into doing somekernel hacking first i will tell you some thing i
> have assumed about it:
> 1.) you should know atleast more progra
On Thursday, 25 January 2001 at 12:54:17 -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:12:42PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>> At 10:58 PM 01/24/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>>> In article
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> you write:
>
>>I'll look into the Linux driver, however, and s
On Wednesday, 24 January 2001 at 21:07:45 -0800, Matt Jacob wrote:
>>
>> I've come in in the middle of this discussion, so maybe there's
>> something I don't know, but on the same hardware and running FreeBSD,
>> I had no problems. Why should we want to replace the driver with
>> something which
On Wednesday, 24 January 2001 at 17:08:16 -0500, Dennis wrote:
>
>>
>>>I'll look into the Linux driver, however, and see if it has anything
>>> useful in it. Historically the Linux Pro/100+ driver has totally sucked and
>>> was chalk-full of magic numbers being anded and ored.
>>
>> That's "ch
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 16:00:55 -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 15-Jan-01 Greg Lehey wrote:
>> On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>
>>> There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
>>>
&g
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 8:41:51 -0800, Richard Hodges wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
>>
>> That fat little penguin is everywhere.
>>
>> The main reason we practically don't see beastie at all is that
>>
On Monday, 15 January 2001 at 13:40:38 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> There is one point where I have to conceed defeat to Linux.
>
> That fat little penguin is everywhere.
>
> The main reason we practically don't see beastie at all is that
> there is no artwork to get hold of anywhere...
>
>
On Monday, 8 January 2001 at 10:04:44 +0200, Roman Shterenzon wrote:
> * Roman Shterenzon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010107 10:24] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at :
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24019
>> It's my friend's PR. Can you give me some hints on how can I de
On Monday, 8 January 2001 at 0:22:01 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Is their a group of FreeBSD Enthusiasts that are working on porting
> free to embedded controllers that are not x86 I am in the process of
> developing a security / access / building management system, and am
> lookin
[following up to -hackers]
On Tuesday, 2 January 2001 at 14:35:39 -0500, Jeff Fellin wrote:
>
> I previous sent this mail on freebsd-current, but realize it
> was probably an incorrect list. So, I am reposting on to
> freebsd-questions. If this is still the wrong list could
> someone tell me the
while (I guess it enters into some dead loop). Is there a way
>>> to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
>>> (with remote debugging or ddb)?
>>
>> kld debugging is a bit tricky. Take a look at the debugging macros and
>> bits that
; to attach to the process and somehow find out which code it is executing
>> (with remote debugging or ddb)?
>
> kld debugging is a bit tricky. Take a look at the debugging macros and
> bits that Greg Lehey put together for vinum for a starting point. You have
> to calculate the
On Thursday, 28 December 2000 at 14:03:31 +, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:30:09PM -0500, David E. Cross wrote:
>> I have run across a problem since updating to -STABLE a week or so ago...
>> my CVS vinum partition would go corrupt after a few updates. I have been
>> ru
On Tuesday, 26 December 2000 at 17:30:09 -0500, David E. Cross wrote:
> I have run across a problem since updating to -STABLE a week or so ago...
> my CVS vinum partition would go corrupt after a few updates. I have been
> running with no softupdates on my system for a day now and no problems.
>
On Tuesday, 19 December 2000 at 16:01:52 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:11:12PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
>> /* Case 1 */ /* Case 2 */
>> if (data) vs. free(data)
>> free(data);
>
>
> Actually
On Friday, 8 December 2000 at 18:29:26 -0600, Stephen Hocking wrote:
> Is there some simple one-liner command that allows me to display the values of
> all the variables within the current stack frame?
info local
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for addre
[redirected to -questions; I don't consider this an in-depth technical
question]
On Wednesday, 29 November 2000 at 21:03:10 +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
> [Posted this to questions too, but no one appeared to know.. maybe someone
> here does?]
>
> Hi,
>
> I've installed FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE on a se
On Wednesday, 15 November 2000 at 10:08:45 +, visi0n wrote:
>
> The THC have a documentation about freebsd kernel space.
>
> packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/bsdkern.htm
Repeating the full URL for the benefit of mutt users, this is
http://packetstorm.securify.com/groups/thc/bs
On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 21:14:25 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
>
>
>> On Tuesday, 14 November 2000 at 16:32:49 -0500, Paonia Ezrine wrote:
>>> I am looking for info on programing in kernel land. System calls, howto's
>>> etc. I have not found anything that realy covers this stuff any and all
1 - 100 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
