* Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-10 23:52 -0400]:
> I was hoping for some option in fsck to allow an alternate lost+found
> directory on another device, but no such luck. Is there anything else
> that I'm overlooking? I'm willing to try anything since I'm doing all
> this on a jun
Hi,
I've worked through most of the problems I had with trying to recover some
data from a dd image of a wrecked filesystem. Thanks very much to
everyone that helped me out with the basics and with the vnconfig stuff to
mount it.
Right now I'm working on another copy of this same image, and I co
Heikki Turunen wrote:
>> Ok, I am now about to upgrade. I can still not tell, from the
>> hardware notes, whether 4.10R will actually support the VIA 8237 ATA
>> 133 as well (it only talks about VIA 8237 SATA 150). I hope so.
>
> I'm using 4.10-STABLE and VIA 8237 works just fine.
>
> 8<--
Porting is probably not an option, since the memory managers are
very different. But the same idea could be applied.
Indeed, in my college times, I had a class about memory testing
procedures, and had an idea to patch the FreeBSD kernel to do realtime
memory tests and lock bad memory.
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Pawel Malachowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 03:02:38PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > as PF+ALTQ gateway in production environment. For ALTQ there is the problem
> > of "will your driver be supported?".
>
> Could You please explain a bit, why ALTQ model is pla
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:25:56PM +0200, christian astrup bakke // chasm wrote:
> has anyone here successfully installed piespy (link further down) in a
> 4.10(-release) enviroment? it needs java, and a paragraph on the piespy page
> says:
>
> "If you run PieSpy in a non-graphical environment (e.
hi!
has anyone here successfully installed piespy (link further down) in a
4.10(-release) enviroment? it needs java, and a paragraph on the piespy page
says:
"If you run PieSpy in a non-graphical environment (e.g. a Unix console that
does not have access to an X server) you will need to pass the
jean-marc tallet said:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a typical pc where I run windows and wish to
> install FreeBSD. Which platform should I choose?
> My processor is x86 family 6 model 4.
>
>
> Sorry also I wanted to know which architecture to pick
> up on the mirror site, between pc98 and i386!
>
You'll ne
> good free environment for initialization and further running. Shortly: ON
> SOME COMPUTERS (MAYBE CPUS) I GET REBOOTING JUST ON 'JMP' INSTRUCTION
> AFTER PE BIT IS ENABLED. I've got no reboots on all i386, i486, i586
> computers that I tryed to boot from. I have a Pentium III Celeron
> (Coppermi
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
I used in past your cdrecord version when it was available on your site.
Is there any new version freely available? :)
They are still at my site actually, butI havn't cared to update them
much (dont fix what aint
Has anyone tried either Stable or Current on the new Dell 1850 or 2850 boxes
(looks like identical motherboard)?
Or any other platform using the Intel E7520 chipset?
Comments?
Dave
David Grant
CanWeb Internet Services
___
[E
I have been getting these kernel panics more frequently now and it has
become a problem. I have used gdb to provide basic information, but I am
not very experienced in this so let me know what to do to give you any more
information. I have had 2 crashes dump a core, so I will include both
(sorry
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:08:48PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >I used in past your cdrecord version when it was available on your site.
> >Is there any new version freely available? :)
>
> They are still at my site actually, butI havn't cared to update them
> much (dont fix what aint broke
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
You meant a growisofs version that does not require ATAPICAM?
Yes, one that uses the ATA userland interface instead, just as I have
versions of cdrecord/cdrdao.
I used in past your cdrecord version when it was a
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >You meant a growisofs version that does not require ATAPICAM?
>
> Yes, one that uses the ATA userland interface instead, just as I have
> versions of cdrecord/cdrdao.
>
I used in past your cdrecord version when it was availabl
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
I used my own creation that at some point could replace burncd, but for
now it is just a skunkworks project (and no I wont hand out copies :) )
I would think that growisofs will work (I do have an ATA version of
Dear Sirs:
Using FreeBSD 4.9R-p3, I cannot use the VIA 8237 ATA133 IDE ports:
> /var/log/dmesg.today:atapci1: port
> 0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 15.1 on pci0
> /var/log/dmesg.today:ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci1
> /var/log/dmesg.today:ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci1
I saw 8.10, however, *does* s
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> I used my own creation that at some point could replace burncd, but for
> now it is just a skunkworks project (and no I wont hand out copies :) )
>
> I would think that growisofs will work (I do have an ATA version of that
> som
Marc Fonvieille wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 10:29:35PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
Wilko Bulte wrote:
How standard are DVD writers these days? In the sense
of: can I expect an ATAPI DVDwriter to 'just work'
with FreeBSD or are there brands/models to avoid or
to prefer?
Any experiences with a NEC
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 10:29:35PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >How standard are DVD writers these days? In the sense
> >of: can I expect an ATAPI DVDwriter to 'just work'
> >with FreeBSD or are there brands/models to avoid or
> >to prefer?
> >
> >Any experiences with a NEC N
> > Danny Braniss wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > is there an 'easy' way to mark some memory as unusable?
> > > thanks,
> > > danny
> >
> > You'll hopefully get a better answer than mine, but in case you don't
> > & need to start hacking code ...
> >
> > Way back on 2.2.8 I disabled all above 16M 'cos
Takanori Watanabe wrote:
Hi, I updated ThinkPad Hotkey driver so that it can
* Read Brightness
* Read Volume
* Read Mute status
* Read Keylight status
* AccessIBM, Zoom Screen(Fn+Sp) toggle.
ToDo lists
* Set Brightness
* Set Volume
* Bluetooth attach/detach.
* Userland worker.
These features will c
Ah yes, now I see. There is no mutex on struct ifnet then? And I suppose
those splimp/splx calls should remain. I'll look at whats available and
relay my findings to you guys.
On Mon, 2004-08-09 at 17:14, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > Here, I pushed that section of code up before the pri
Here, I pushed that section of code up before the prior
mtx_unlock(&tp->tap_mtx) above it, then removed the splimp/splx calls.
Is this what you were referring to (attached)? Also, I noticed splx and
splimp are called in a number of other places in this driver, even under
-CURRENT. You want those ou
Seems to work in both -RELEASE and -CURRENT, though I needed to manually
apply the patch as line numbers were off in -RELEASE. I can see how the
locking could become a problem in -CURRENT.
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 05:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 10:06:17AM +0300, Alex Lyashkov wrot
Yeah, this page:
http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/TODO/
was one that I looked at and wasn't sure what the status was on the projects that were
listed. One in particular was the PCI device driver library item. Does anyone know
the status on this? I would like to pick this up if it is still open.
* Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040809 11:42]:
> is there an 'easy' way to mark some memory as unusable? thanks,
Linux has BadRAM: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/index.html, I
think someone was thinking of porting it to FreeBSD... (or maybe it was
you ;)
qvb
--
pica
___
27 matches
Mail list logo
