Hello,
Someone asked for checkpointing libraries for FreeBSD
on the cluster list. I went to --
http://www.checkpointing.org/
today and found they have several libraries for Linux
(and also several kernel patches for kernel checkpoint
), but no FreeBSD ports available, however.
Anyone interested
dap> I suggest that the version of sendmail configs shipped with FreeBSD
dap> should default to having WorkAroundBroken set by default.
--- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ---
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cvs commit: src/etc/sendmail freeb
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:25:48PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> their hands full with other things to do. In any case, the sar
> cources are extremely UnixWare/OpenUNIX-oriented and I think
> that it's easier to rewrite sar from the man page than try to port
> it.
Just for reference: The linux
Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > Terry Lambert wrote:
> > >
> > > Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > > > Compile up the real sar. SCO released the sources a year
> > > > > or two back, now.
> > > >
> > The good news is that the Caldera management still supports the
> > idea and a
>> I suggest that the version of sendmail configs shipped with FreeBSD
>> should default to having WorkAroundBroken set by default.
ticso> That would break v6 support and only works for sendmail just to handle
ticso> broken nameservers.
This does not break IPv6 support. It does however poss
Thus spake Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think we should modify the FreeBSD DNS server to respond to
> all gethostbyaddr() requests in "pig latin", e.g.:
...
> And then modify sendmail and mozilla and Internet Explorer to make up
> for our f-'ed up DNS server, since it should "be generous
* Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020520 15:15] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > level not edge. I think you can also use the CURSIG macro to check
> > for pending signals if you don't want to yeild.
> >
> > --
> > -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Is
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> level not edge. I think you can also use the CURSIG macro to check
> for pending signals if you don't want to yeild.
>
> --
> -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is any of this documented right now? I had a use for checking whether a
kill signa
* Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020520 15:01] wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> >
> > When we reboot a machine, it seems to me that the kernel sends signal 15
> > to daemons and wait 60 seconds for them to finish. In my program, I use
> > kthread_create() to create a daemon,
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
>
> When we reboot a machine, it seems to me that the kernel sends signal 15
> to daemons and wait 60 seconds for them to finish. In my program, I use
> kthread_create() to create a daemon, how to make sure that my daemon
> finishes all its job before rebo
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:52:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> The problem is that as you maintain your patches, and the patch
> vendor maintains their patches, and DJB maintains his code, you
> end up with network effects.
>
But DJB does't maintain his code. I don't think it he has touche
When we reboot a machine, it seems to me that the kernel sends signal 15
to daemons and wait 60 seconds for them to finish. In my program, I use
kthread_create() to create a daemon, how to make sure that my daemon
finishes all its job before reboot can proceed? Do I need to let the
daemon catch
Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> It is not a matter of a timeout.
> The "A ?" come back fine.
> `dig' and 'nslookup' both resolve the name -- there is no timeout.
> `ping' works, for example.
>
> Because sendmail "correctly" (aka: anal-retentively) adheres to a
> protocol, it flags this as an error,
Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> Further investigation dug up this manifesto in the sendmail README:
>
> When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name
> servers will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_
> (IPv6) lookups. If you want to excuse this behav
If sysctl attempts to decode various structures that have changed
size it exits without trying to finish parsing the tree...
I'm not sure I like the following patch, but without anything better
I think it should go in...
Index: sysctl.c
==
Adrian Filipi-Martin wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> > > Brandon D. Valentine([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.17 14:48:07 +:
> > > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Doug White wrote:
> > > > >You are welcome to rewrite qmail to use kqueue if you wish :)
>
Crist J. Clark says:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:25:58PM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> > It is not a matter of a timeout.
...
> > I have no control over austinenergy.com's DNS. It has nothing to do
> > with my ISP. I am my own ISP, which is why I spent some time looking
> > into this fai
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:54:28PM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> > > So, in violation of the networking "be liberal in what you accept and
> > > conserva
Damon Anton Permezel says:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
...
> I have been running systems for years now with ipv6 interfaces, and
> I do not believe I have ever exchanged an IPv6 packet with anyone, so
> I nolonger include v6.
And you still drive a horse and b
The issue here is that there are nameservers out there which, with
the prior release of freebsd, worked fine with sendmail.
An incompatible version of sendmail is about to be foisted on an
unsuspecting public.
I don't care particularly one way or the other, as I now know
what the problem is, and
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 08:40:11PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> > So, in violation of the networking "be liberal in what you accept and
> > conservative in what you produce", sendmail in it's new form will have many
> > perple
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:25:58PM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> It is not a matter of a timeout.
Correct. The NS is actually reporting a transient error in response to
queries.
> The "A ?" come back fine.
> `dig' and 'nslookup' both resolve the name -- there is no timeout.
> `ping'
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> So, in violation of the networking "be liberal in what you accept and
> conservative in what you produce", sendmail in it's new form will have many
> perplexed sysadmins spending lots of time tracking down these mysterious
> f
E.B. Dreger writes:
>I'm about to whip up a utility that will take any arbitrary
>file and store the contents in a .o file (complete with symbol
>names so one can actually link, of course).
Why don't you just write a script (sed, awk, perl, whatever)
to write the C source for you, from a plainte
It is not a matter of a timeout.
The "A ?" come back fine.
`dig' and 'nslookup' both resolve the name -- there is no timeout.
`ping' works, for example.
Because sendmail "correctly" (aka: anal-retentively) adheres to a
protocol, it flags this as an error, and doesn't attempt to try the
"A ?" quer
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thomas David Rivers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Ok - the next question would be - is there a way to "un-do" that?
> : Since ISA interrupts worked before?
>
> hw.pcic.intr_path=1 is supposed to do
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:51:54AM -0500, Damon Anton Permezel wrote:
> Since upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6-*, I have had problems exchanging
> email with a correspondent at "austinenergy.com". It shows up as:
>
> % echo hi | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> austinenergy.com: Name server time
Since upgrading from 4.5 to 4.6-*, I have had problems exchanging
email with a correspondent at "austinenergy.com". It shows up as:
% echo hi | mail -v [EMAIL PROTECTED]
austinenergy.com: Name server timeout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Transient parse error -- message queued for
f
4.6-RC (which I am assuming is "release candidate") still doesn't
walk the entire PCI bus and find all devices for a Dell Poweredge 4600.
Below, interested parties will be able to peruse the `boot -v' results,
followed by `scanpci -v1'.
I have a single Qlogic F/C card plugged into one of the PCI
On Sat, 18 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> > Brandon D. Valentine([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.17 14:48:07 +:
> > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Doug White wrote:
> > > >You are welcome to rewrite qmail to use kqueue if you wish :)
> > >
> > > Although if I read the lice
On Friday, May 17, 2002, at 10:23 AM, Nathan Hawkins wrote:
> For years, I've had the best luck with building my own systems, or
> having built to my specifications. Have comp delivered mostly
> assembled, but without hard drive installed, I can usually avoid having
> to buy Windows, too. Goi
"E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
Eddy,
Instead of a system-specific approach, you might want
to take advantage of what the C language has to offer.
For example, your multi-line issue.
You realise that the C preprocessor/compiler will
concatentate adjacen
32 matches
Mail list logo
