On Sat, 18 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:

> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> > Brandon D. Valentine([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.17 14:48:07 +0000:
> > > On Fri, 17 May 2002, Doug White wrote:
> > > >You are welcome to rewrite qmail to use kqueue if you wish :)
> > >
> > > Although if I read the license correctly you hand djb a contract for
> > > your soul and first born child if you do.  ;-)
> >
> > if you read the license _correctly_, you'd just distribute a patch, and
> > that's perfectly okay. so, what about to do with your soul and first born
> > child now? ;-)
>
> Spend them maintaining the patch, when DJB fails to integrate the
> patch into the main line source for qmail?
>
> -- Terry

        Sounds like an ideal use of the ports system.  The qmail port
already has several patches, so the incremental effort may not be too bad.

        Adrian
--
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to