> On Linux this is what I do to get this value: Measure the number of
> scheduled jiffies (hundreths of second), measure elapsed time since last
> measurement, divide.
I ran into the same problem as you - and took the time to implement it.
My patches fix the SMP case as well as getting it via sy
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
>
> > > >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD
> > > >internals in my spare time.
> > >
> > > "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before they are
> > > in commercial use.
> >
>
Mark Hittinger wrote:
>
> Something that the old DEC took a few stabs at was the idea of a
> "checkpoint" feature where a process or a series of processes could be
> put in a quiesced state. This would page out the process or processes
> into the swap space, allow a hardware shutdown, and after
Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>
> -On [20000312 00:00], Joe Abley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>
> >> Another point is that Open Source is virtually synonomous with "Totally
> >> undocumented".
&
> Mark Hittinger writes:
> >
> >Something that the old DEC took a few stabs at was the idea of a
> >"checkpoint" feature where a process or a series of processes could be
> >put in a quiesced state. This would page out the process or processes
> >into the swap space, allow a hardware shutdown, an
* Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000312 15:56] wrote:
>
> > > Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
> > ...
> > > real memory = 402587648 (393152K bytes)
> > > config> q
> > > avail memory = 387334144 (378256K bytes)
> > > Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
> > > IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 ->
Mark Hittinger writes:
>
>Something that the old DEC took a few stabs at was the idea of a
>"checkpoint" feature where a process or a series of processes could be
>put in a quiesced state. This would page out the process or processes
>into the swap space, allow a hardware shutdown, and after a re
> > Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
> ...
> > real memory = 402587648 (393152K bytes)
> > config> q
> > avail memory = 387334144 (378256K bytes)
> > Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
> > IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0
> > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard
> > cpu0 (BSP): apic id:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>
>Something that the old DEC took a few stabs at was the idea of a
>"checkpoint" feature where a process or a series of processes could be
>put in a quiesced state. This would page out the process or processes
>into the swap space, allow a hardware shutd
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > I'm definitely for it... If I can get permission from Jordan, perhaps the
> > attached patches can make it into upcoming release.
>
> I think it's a fine idea, I'm just not sure one day before release
> is the time to be talking about it. It sho
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
> > >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD
> > >internals in my spare time.
> >
> > "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before they are
> > in commercial use.
>
> Really? That's very different from
* Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000312 13:50] wrote:
>
> > > Not a whole lot done, I had the MAXUSERS set to 128, though am about to
> > > bump it to 256 when I rebuild to see if that helps. I used to have some
> > > tunables for BSDI when I used it, but when I tried to apply them to FBSD
> >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD
> >internals in my spare time.
>
> "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before they are
> in commercial use.
Really? That's very different from my experience as a commercial
software developer.
And, i
> > Not a whole lot done, I had the MAXUSERS set to 128, though am about to
> > bump it to 256 when I rebuild to see if that helps. I used to have some
> > tunables for BSDI when I used it, but when I tried to apply them to FBSD
> > it bitched about them being unknown so I just left them out.
CC'ing -hackers in case we can scare up some interest . . .
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi. I took a look over the archives and noticed this ancient
> > thread. (1998) However, I checked the handbook and LINT for options on
> > how FreeBSD logs ECC errors, but I could not find anyth
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 04:14:34AM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> At 09:19 AM 3/13/00 +1300, Joe Abley wrote:
> >I have yet to find a "real product" with good documentation.
>
> I hate when these discussions get so out of context. The original point
> regarded source code, and whether it was useful enoug
Something that the old DEC took a few stabs at was the idea of a
"checkpoint" feature where a process or a series of processes could be
put in a quiesced state. This would page out the process or processes
into the swap space, allow a hardware shutdown, and after a reboot allow
the restart of th
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
[open source is irrelevant because none but but the authors can
really fix things]
[open source _means_ that it's never finished]
[the existing commercial support sucks]
Seems like a pretty pointless and content-free set of remarks to
be ma
* Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000312 13:20] wrote:
>
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am getting the following errors out of FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT trying to
> > > run an IRC server, and was wondering if anyone had any ideas or recommended
> > > tunables I should set??
> > >
> > >
> > > M
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am getting the following errors out of FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT trying to
> > run an IRC server, and was wondering if anyone had any ideas or recommended
> > tunables I should set??
> >
> >
> > Mar 9 22:32:03 u /usr/ircd/undernet/ircd[154]: Unable to create auth socket f
At 09:19 AM 3/13/00 +1300, Joe Abley wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>> At 07:32 PM 3/12/00 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>> >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD
>> >internals in my spare time.
>>
>> "slowly" is the key word h
Excerpt from Slashdot interview:
David Greenman and Mike Karels will be working together as
co-architects for the new system. As features are merged in, they will
be available for download at www.freebsd.org, and on "snapshot" CDROMs.
The completely merged system will be released as FreeBSD 5.0.
* Howard Leadmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000312 12:51] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following errors out of FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT trying to
> run an IRC server, and was wondering if anyone had any ideas or recommended
> tunables I should set??
>
>
> Mar 9 22:32:03 u /usr/ircd/under
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> At 07:32 PM 3/12/00 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD
> >internals in my spare time.
>
> "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before they are
Hello,
I am getting the following errors out of FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT trying to
run an IRC server, and was wondering if anyone had any ideas or recommended
tunables I should set??
Mar 9 22:32:03 u /usr/ircd/undernet/ircd[154]: Unable to create auth socket for
[@163.152.216.46]:No buffer
At 07:32 PM 3/12/00 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
>-On [2312 00:00], Joe Abley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>
>>> Another point is that Open Source is virtually synonomous with "Totally
>>>
> I'm definitely for it... If I can get permission from Jordan, perhaps the
> attached patches can make it into upcoming release.
I think it's a fine idea, I'm just not sure one day before release
is the time to be talking about it. It should have been raised
before now. :(
- Jordan
To Unsubs
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> > On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > Then look up the definition of kread() in the same file, and
> > > how the contents of cur.cp_time are used in the cpustats()
> > >
-On [2312 00:00], Joe Abley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 01:36:31PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
>> Another point is that Open Source is virtually synonomous with "Totally
>> undocumented".
>
>This is sillier.
Exactly, and it also slightly p
At 03:29 PM 3/12/00 +0200, Narvi wrote:
>
>On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>> > Why haven't you considered hiring somebody to document the parts you are
>> > intersted in? Would solve at least half the problem...
>>
>> To be fair to Dennis, it's not the cost of paying the dropo
Could we place relocate this topic to -chat or -advocacy, since it
doesn't seem that correct to be discussed on -hackers.
Hackers was meant for quality technical discussion, not discussions
about FUD, stupidity of people whom don't read official messages posted
prior to stating things, spinning o
>
>I think this is an exciting period in FreeBSD's development, I personally
>am very excited.
I think it *could* be a "good" thing, but the proof of the pudding is in
the taste. Just keep a bag packed in case.
DB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hack
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-hackers:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Then look up the definition of kread() in the same file, and
> > how the contents of cur.cp_time are used in the cpustats()
> > function. Note that "cur" is a "struct statinfo", wh
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
> > Then look up the definition of kread() in the same file, and
> > how the contents of cur.cp_time are used in the cpustats()
> > function. Note that "cur" is a "struct statinfo", which is
> > defined in /
heh, having read over the responses of the people "in the know" (and I've
only known about this for a month or two and only by guessing ;)) I think
this is very beneficial.
Jordan, as always has thought about everything, contingency plans, and has
made it very clear that the aquisition of WCCDROM
It seems Sitaram Iyer wrote:
> (kernel 4.0-2208-CURRENT)
>
> I have a question about adstrategy() in ata-disk.c: it says
>
> bufqdisksort() -- which appends to the drive queue using CSCAN,
>
> and immediately, without a check for adp->active, there is
>
> ad_start() -- which re
Uhhh...
And before anybody gets all kinds of funny ideas, no, i am not trying to
blackmail Dennis.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Narvi wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Why haven't you considered hiring somebody to document the parts you are
> > > intersted in? Wo
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
[snip]
> > Why haven't you considered hiring somebody to document the parts you are
> > intersted in? Would solve at least half the problem...
>
> To be fair to Dennis, it's not the cost of paying the dropout to fix this
> driver that's at issue here.
Once again I must ask... What do you know of Open Source?
Aside from your enlightened criticisms I've seen nothing in
the way of any sort of contribution. No ports maintenance,
no code contribution. Nothing other than pure profiteering
and never returning anything but a kick in the nuts.
Thank
39 matches
Mail list logo
