> 1: The built-in SCSI ROM is v2.01, there was mention of BIOS 1008 including
>2.11. I applied the 1008 flash and I am still v2.01 (I don't know if
>this matters at all)
At least for the P2B-S, you need 1008B, not 1008. The file I got from
ftp.asus.com is:
rw-r--r-- 1 sthaug 1001 181
On 15 May 1999 at 20:08, John & Jennifer Reynolds wrote:
[snip]
> Is anyone playing with that VMware stuff?
[snip]
It doesn't run on FreeBSD, only on Linux and Windows NT. Pity, because
it is very neat.
Jacques Vidrine / n...@nectar.cc / nec...@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo
[moved to -hackers]
On Sunday, 16 May 1999 at 23:03:11 -0500, Mike Heffner wrote:
>
> I would like to trace the source of a panic during boot time. How do I compile
> the boot loader code in DEBUG mode? I tried defining DEBUG with make, but it
> didn't work. What's the _right_ way to compile speci
I dug through the archives and found peopel with similiar problems to
what I am experiencing, but I didn't find any answers that have worked
for me. Here are the problem I am having:
1: The built-in SCSI ROM is v2.01, there was mention of BIOS 1008 including
2.11. I applied the 1008 flash a
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Alex Le Heux writes:
> > Maybe I'm completely wrong here, but didn't I read somewhere that with
> > softupdates it would theoretically be possible to boot the system before
> > the fsck and fsck while it's running?
>
> Yes.. if you make the assumptions t
Alex Le Heux writes:
> Maybe I'm completely wrong here, but didn't I read somewhere that with
> softupdates it would theoretically be possible to boot the system before
> the fsck and fsck while it's running?
Yes.. if you make the assumptions that:
1. There are no bugs in the soft updates code
Joe Abley wrote:
> I compiled the 1.1 client for FreeBSD3.1 -- what seems to be the
> problem with it? [It seemed to work ok for me, but I admit I didn't
> test it very exhaustively].
I'm running it on a P166 box running 3.1, and it's running quite
happily.
As an aside:
I noticed on the s...@
> > > > It seems there's a need, and the possibility. Would somebody like to
> > > > suggest a syntax?
> > >
> > > The precedent would be the socket ioctls SIOCGIFHWADDR and
> > > SIOCSIFHWADDR. The Linux emulator suppors the get-only version
> > > already.
> >It's already been mentioned tha
-Original Message-
From: Mike Smith
Date: Sunday, May 16, 1999 3:08 PM
>> My character device driver receives a pointer to a user data buffer in
the
>> user's address space. I need to DMA those data. For this, I need to bring
>> the pages into memory and lock them before initiating the DM
> Should I actually think about changes to make, or should I simply hold off
> and let more experienced kernel hackers take care of the fixes?
If you have the time and motivation to produce changes, please do indeed
do so. You'll achieve best results by establishing a relationship with
one or mo
> From: adr...@freebsd.org
> Date: 1999-05-16 04:59:51 -0700
> To: Bernd Walter
> Subject: Re: ifconfig: changing mac address
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
> In-reply-to: "Your message of Sun, 16 May 1999 11:48:42
> +0200."<19990516114842.a48...@cicely8.cicely.de>
> Delivered-to: freebsd-hacke
> My character device driver receives a pointer to a user data buffer in the
> user's address space. I need to DMA those data. For this, I need to bring
> the pages into memory and lock them before initiating the DMA.
>
> My book tells about physio(). However, I found it unconvenient for me.
> One
Hi All,
I've had an ISA character device driver which I wrote ages ago, under 2.2.5,
it made it through 2.2.x into 3.0 (just about), but it's blatently not going
to make it through the recent transitions into 4.0 [I've not had enough time
to keep it up to date etc.]
I've looked through the 4.X dr
The programmer's resource at http://www.wotsit.org has been updated again.
I apologise for the lack of update E-mails recently, I have now implemented
the update list in a different way which should make the process work better.
18 files have been added or modified in the last 7 days, use the "
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> Didn't Knuth say "I've only proven TeX to be correct, I haven't tested
> it" or some such?
That's a quote in /usr/src/games/fortune/datfiles/fortunes:
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it."
On Thu, Apr 08, 1999 at 02:53:00PM -0400, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> Fun. Fun. Fun. I am trying to port some software to a system with
> only gmake and the makefile uses bmake-style conditionals. Is there a good
> way to convert the conditionals? Here is the offender:
Not sure. It might be simpler t
> Yes Etherchannel uses some other mechanism to balance the load.
Its acually worse :)
Cisco Etherchannel requires the device attached to speak a special protocol
to keep things working. You can not just take any system, put 2 NIC's in it
plug it into a cisco switch, and expect it to work. It w
> On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:26:37AM -0700, Steve Rubin wrote:
> > This is not how Etherchannel works. Anyone from cisco here care to explain
> > better than I possibly could?
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 08:28:55PM -0700, John Milford wrote:
> > >
> > > You have to have the capibility on t
Jim Carroll wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone has done any work on fsck and very large file
> systems. We have a system that has 126 GB RAID Array. As you can imagine,
> fsck chokes trying to alloc enough blocks to store it's internal data
> structures (128 MB RAM, 128 MB Swap)
Fun. Fun. Fun. I am trying to port some software to a system with
only gmake and the makefile uses bmake-style conditionals. Is there a good
way to convert the conditionals? Here is the offender:
.ifmake fastcgi
DEFINES += -DFASTCGI
CFLAGS+=-I$(FCGIINCLUDEDIR)
.endif
I really appre
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:26:37AM -0700, Steve Rubin wrote:
> This is not how Etherchannel works. Anyone from cisco here care to explain
> better than I possibly could?
>
> On Fri, May 14, 1999 at 08:28:55PM -0700, John Milford wrote:
> >
> > You have to have the capibility on the switch, a
>> overloaded for this, no? The driver could fail the request if it
>> didn't support it; or if it has run out of slots for aliases. There
>> should also be (I think) a way to tell the driver to go to
>> promiscuous mode to emulate this (an "I really want this" request?),
>> but I'm not
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:12:29PM -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> > > It seems there's a need, and the possibility. Would somebody like to
> > > suggest a syntax?
> >
> > The precedent would be the socket ioctls SIOCGIFHWADDR and
> > SIOCSIFHWADDR. The Linux emulator suppors the get-only versi
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> yes, but this is what compiling Xlib with threading support is suppose
> to fix this so that you don't have problems... I haven't exactly looked
> at what the threading support DOES for Xlib though, but I did manage
> to make it so that XInitThreads() would return true, bu
John Birrell scribbled this message on May 16:
> John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Dean Lombardo scribbled this message on May 16:
> > > Why does X have multi-thread support disabled by default?
> > >
> > > Quite a few programs (e.g. freeamp) give nasty "Xlib: unexpected async
> > > reply" errors due to
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 08:14:37AM +0100, Dean Lombardo wrote:
>Why does X have multi-thread support disabled by default?
>
>Quite a few programs (e.g. freeamp) give nasty "Xlib: unexpected async
>reply" errors due to making X calls from more than one thread.
>
>Now that threads and libc_r are part
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Dean Lombardo scribbled this message on May 16:
> > Why does X have multi-thread support disabled by default?
> >
> > Quite a few programs (e.g. freeamp) give nasty "Xlib: unexpected async
> > reply" errors due to making X calls from more than one thread.
> >
> > Now tha
> >What a cool idea.
> >
> >Maybe we'll see a FreeBSD/USENIX conference on-deck someday.
>
> There was a very successful EUUG conference held on the Stockholm -
> Helsinki Ferry some years ago...
but those things have to do with alchool restrictions/high tax in
some nordic country, isn't it ?
Dean Lombardo scribbled this message on May 16:
> Why does X have multi-thread support disabled by default?
>
> Quite a few programs (e.g. freeamp) give nasty "Xlib: unexpected async
> reply" errors due to making X calls from more than one thread.
>
> Now that threads and libc_r are part of the s
Why does X have multi-thread support disabled by default?
Quite a few programs (e.g. freeamp) give nasty "Xlib: unexpected async
reply" errors due to making X calls from more than one thread.
Now that threads and libc_r are part of the system (and have been for a
while), perhaps Xlibs should be b
30 matches
Mail list logo
