G'day Ken,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:45:09PM +0900, Ken Yamada wrote:
> I am running JBoss 4.2 which does not like jdk1.6.0, yet. And I setenv
> JAVA_HOME to /usr/local/jdk1.5.0. That is why I am saying that we'd better
> include JAVA_HOME in eclipse.in.
Well, you're basically shooting you
Mike,
I am running JBoss 4.2 which does not like jdk1.6.0, yet. And I setenv
JAVA_HOME to /usr/local/jdk1.5.0. That is why I am saying that we'd better
include JAVA_HOME in eclipse.in.
When all java stuff supports jdk1.6.0 it will not be necessary, but for a
being, I feel that it will b
Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
>> Ken Yamada wrote:
>>> Opps!
>>>
>>> You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
>>> It needs to be ;
>>>
>>> do-build:
>>>@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
>>>./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS}
Ken Yamada wrote:
Mike,
It does not run with jdk1.5.0 - it generates "Bad version number in .class
file" error. So, we'd better include JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0 in eclipse.in.
I reflected your patch, the above and eliminating unnecessary working files
to my eclipse-europa-dan.tgz
Mike,
It does not run with jdk1.5.0 - it generates "Bad version number in .class
file" error. So, we'd better include JAVA_HOME=/usr/local/jdk1.6.0 in
eclipse.in.
I reflected your patch, the above and eliminating unnecessary working files
to my eclipse-europa-dan.tgz and confirmed that
Mike Bowie wrote:
> Mike Bowie wrote:
>> Ken Yamada wrote:
>>> Sorry one more...
>>>
>>> The instruction says;
>>> : ::
>>> # In the build.xml
>>>
>>> * update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect
>>> the new architecture
>>>
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
> Ken Yamada wrote:
> > Opps!
> >
> > You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
> > It needs to be ;
> >
> >do-build:
> >@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
> >./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH}
Greg,
Sounds good to me... I was going to ask at what point that might be
feasible. It might drum up a bit of feedback, which couldn't hurt.
I'm guessing someone out there has commit access to the ports tree ;-)
Cheers,
Mike.
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Mi
Ken Yamada wrote:
Opps!
You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
It needs to be ;
do-build:
@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH} -comp
ilelibs)
@${CP} ${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_10
Opps!
You missed ${WRKSRC} in ${CP}.
It needs to be ;
do-build:
@(cd ${WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} \
./build -os ${ECLIPSE_OS} -ws ${ECLIPSE_WS} -arch ${ECLIPSE_ARCH} -comp
ilelibs)
@${CP} ${WRKSRC}/launchertmp/library/${ECLIPSE_WS}/eclipse_1017a.so \
Ok campers... see how this suits.
I've diff'd a patch against Ken and Dan's port bundle from September
6th. (See http://www.tydfam.jp/eclipse-europa-dan.tgz)
http://www.buzmo.com/projects/eclipse-europa-port/Makefile-090807.diff
It's changes are based on the 3.2 port, but it installs into
$
Mike,
Good to hear that it works!!
How did you make it work? Would you please tell how you did install it? And
if possible, would you please tweak ports's Makefile so that it can be
installed as ordinary ports?
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org
Mike Bowie wrote:
Ken Yamada wrote:
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: ::
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect
the new architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new arc
Ken Yamada wrote:
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: ::
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect the new
architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new architecture
# Run the
Sorry one more...
The instruction says;
: ::
# In the build.xml
* update the compilelibs property in the init target to reflect the new
architecture
* update the compilelibs target to reflect the new architecture
# Run the build using "build
Mike,
I used the most updated jdk1.6.0 which solved the exec() issue. And I have
no particular errors so far.
I tried to compile it on Fedra Linux of which Java was 1.5.0 as a reference,
and the compilation went without problem - it said that it ignores
"Annotations" of course.
Some
Greg Lewis wrote:
G'day Mike,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:11:54AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
First up, thanks to Ken and Dan for getting this port started... nice
work chaps!
I've been playing with Ken's eclipse-europa-dan port for the last couple
of days and haven't had a lot of joy so far.
G'day Mike,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:11:54AM -0700, Mike Bowie wrote:
> First up, thanks to Ken and Dan for getting this port started... nice
> work chaps!
>
> I've been playing with Ken's eclipse-europa-dan port for the last couple
> of days and haven't had a lot of joy so far... it might ju
First up, thanks to Ken and Dan for getting this port started... nice
work chaps!
I've been playing with Ken's eclipse-europa-dan port for the last couple
of days and haven't had a lot of joy so far... it might just be my
environments, but here are the notes from the two hosts I've tested with
Quoting Ken Yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:16:43
+0900 (JST)):
I think that I patched almost all and it is now possible to finish
compilation. However, it does not work
It complains "The Eclipse executable launcher was unable to locate
its companion shared l
I think that I patched almost all and it is now possible to finish
compilation. However, it does not work
It complains "The Eclipse executable launcher was unable to locate its
companion shared library" when it starts, something still missing? (tar file
in result has 1685 files while
Heres what I've come up with.
http://rucci.org/eclipse-europa contains the port and my error log from
building. My build currently fails in plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.compiler.tool
It looks like its a problem related to the ant build file
==
Some notes on how porting 3.3 differs from 3.2
Ther
Is there any progress in porting eclipse 3.3 so far?
I am struggling at it without any success yet. And I would like to have any
support/help from others - it is somewhat beyond my knowledge
Some I noticed are;
1) It requires jdk1.6.0 - jdt compilation fails with jdk1.5.0.
2) file
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 04:49:52 Ken Yamada wrote:
> Sorry, please ignore my previous mail.
>
> I found the source code
>
Hi Ken
Just wondered how you are doing with eclipse 3.3 . I saw the recent upgrades
for 3.2 and wondered how you were fairing with the latest europa (3.3.0). I
am u
Sorry, please ignore my previous mail.
I found the source code
Sorry!
___
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi!
Eclipse.org seemingly do not provide source codes of 3.3/Europe. We may need
to extract necessary source code from CVS repository which is different from
3.1/3.2 era.
We may need to have different approach/strategy
___
freebsd-eclipse@f
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 08:58 +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> david
> >
> > freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, now CC'ed, may be a better place to
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
Thanks
david
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
though I don't see anything in their archives about it.
On a side note, are any commi
On Saturday 21 July 2007 10:45:56 Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > david
>
> freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
> though I don't see anyth
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
>
> Thanks
>
> david
freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
though I don't see anything in their archives about it.
On a side note, are any committers associ
30 matches
Mail list logo
