Just a warning -- it does not appear to have reverse DNS set up on it.
This could be a problem if you try to ever send mail from it.
> host cvsup6.freebsd.org
cvsup6.freebsd.org is a nickname for hitter.freebsd.org
hitter.freebsd.org has address 207.192.64.20
> nslookup 207.192.64.20
Server: ns2
Why can't the PAO changes be committed to the main source tree? It would
be nice if I could just install the latest version of FreeBSD from
the Walnut Creek CD-ROM as is and have PCMCIA and APM support on my
laptop without always having to wait for Hosokawa.
I asked about this previously and rece
That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
place.
Is it something that I can help with? Or is it more a political issue? Can
you send me a pointer to something that goes into more detail?
I wil
Thanks. End of discussion. If I am able to tidy up parts of PAO I will do
just that.
-Kip
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
> > That is the kind of response I like. I don't ap
it would
create a 300baud modem was considered completely normal. Nowadays, when
the average gaudy web page is > 20k (read ~20 1k packets) it is safe to
say that things have changed.
-Kip
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Nate Williams wrote:
> > Considering the
That is a much more genuine concern than bandwidth. Applications should
decide for themselves whether or not to use keepalives.
-Kip
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 12:40:34PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
>
> &
Is it that long? I honestly don't think I have ever seen one stay up for a
week. Are you sure you did not mean 48 hours? I don't speak in jest.
-Kip
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
> how about a keepalive of 48 days..
This does make sense. I do some work on a mail server and I don't use
keepalives because 2 hours is _too_much_ time to be wasting a descriptor.
I periodically check how long a connection has been open and if it exceeds
a certain amount I close the connection.
Lookup natd on the freebsd page.
On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, Nicolai Petri wrote:
> Subject says it all.. Almost..
> Is it natd or is it the kernel ??
> Maybe a plug-in system for natd could do it ?
>
>
> ---
> Nicolai Petri
> n...@swamp.dk
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
>
I made the same comment several months ago and received a rather cool
reception. I was simply told to change it to my liking in login.conf.
-Kip
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
> Hi,
>
>On a FreeBSD 4.0-19991223-SNAP system...
>
I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does
not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads.
However, it does not appear that I can change it without replacing all of
libc. Is this correct? Or is there some simple change I can make to the
files in li
Although your interaction is amusing, I subscribe to this mailing list to
keep up to date on -current and not to see the script for the latest
sitcom for geeks.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Any pointers to web pages on setting up a killfile? The signal to noise
ratio on this list is dropping rapidly.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Grow up.
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
> a "fluke";
>
> All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
> authent
c/sys/compile/KMM i386
Thanks.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Do you know what the timeline is on this integration?
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was
> > embroiled in a
I am inclined to agree. An obscure company like Lyris would not be making
money hand over fist if majordomo were that great.
-Kip
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 09:59:28PM -0600, wrote:
> > He is just expre
on 3.2-R gdb-4.18 will core dump without fail when I try to read a core
file generated by the C++ program I am developing - gdb-4.17 does not have
this problem.
-Kip
On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Richard Cownie wr
I tried doing the same on FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE
but when I run it it complains that it is unable to find dynamic linker
breakpoint function and then it stops with a SIGTRAP.
Any ideas what might be wrong?
Thanks.
-Kip
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Richard Cownie wrote
I am sorry if I am repeating something that has already been fixed -
I just did buildworld which completed without errors - however, when I did
installworld it ended with the following:
vm/vm_object.h -> vm/vm_object.ph
vm/vm_page.h -> vm/vm_page.ph
vm/vm_pageout.h -> vm/vm_pageout.ph
vm/vm_pag
Thanks, that fixed it.
-Kip
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Adam Strohl wrote:
> I get this on 4.0-C its because of this thing in
> gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph if I remeber correctly. I just removed the
> directory from the utils Makefile ("when in doubt commen
.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I know that this is not the place to hype one's own wares, but if your
lists have fewer than 200 people, why not just use the free version of
lyris. One of its many features is sophisticated bounce handling.
-Kip
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Sean Eric
This for -questions, but 3.3-STABLE does so presumably current does as
well.
-Kip
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, mariusz wrote:
> Hi
>
>What depth of FreeBSD's support for Linux applications under
>FreeBSD 4.0? I can't seem to find adequ
form Linux's native threads by ~50x for
things like sending mail. I would assume that the differences in database
performance is similar.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
lack of time.
-Kip
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Why do we need to smite the Linux database servers? With threads in their
> > current state they already outperform Linux's native threads by ~50x for
> > things like sending ma
Most people I have shown the FreeBSD installer are much more impressed
with it than Redhat's snazzy GUI.
-Kip
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, jack wrote:
> Today Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > > Given the primary mission of sysinstall is to load FreeBSD, I&
ht.
>
> - Jordan
And it undermines even the strongest of technical arguments.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
would advise waiting a few days. This round of
>>>>> changes
>>>>> are not yet complete.
>>
>> What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors
>> from the vm page lock-related changes? Kip's original post on -arch
>> menti
It may not be memory corruption. I get this panic on
various versions of STABLE on different pieces of
hardware. See 42235 and 42277.
-Kip
--- Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > If I were you I'd start swapping memory modules
Sorry, if I'm repeating something already said, but
the tone of your mail would indicate that I'm not.
This doesn't sound like an intrinsic limitation of
devfs, just an issue with how it is structured now.
There should just be a central file for all the
devices which devfs sucks in at build (or m
> FWIW, it is not 'call doadump', it is just 'dump' for some time.
> I think calling doadump does not work.
When I tested my dump changes against head a week ago
ddb> call doadump()
provided the same functionality as it always has.
Cheers
___
freebsd
It would help to know your configuration. Also, can you furnish us with a core?
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Andrey Smagin wrote:
> Before all upgrade system never crash.
> After upgrade system month ago happens every day Kernel panic "rtfree 2" at
> rtfree
> route_output
> sosend_generic
> s
The module makefile needs to be updated evidently. Just add it to the
dependencies until rwatson gets around to fixing it.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> has anybody seen this buildworld failure?
>
> ===> sys/modules/portalfs (depend)
> @ -> /usr/git-freeb
34 matches
Mail list logo
