Most people I have shown the FreeBSD installer are much more impressed
with it than Redhat's snazzy GUI.
-Kip
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, jack wrote:
> Today Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > > Given the primary mission of sysinstall is to load FreeBSD, I'd
> > > go so far as to say that developing an X version would be wasting
> > > valuable developer resources (IMHO, of course).
> >
> > It's a painful tradeoff between functionality and flash. The latter is
> > an unfortunate necessity if we are to avoid looking hopelessly outdated.
>
> Not arguing the point in reguard to the "unwashed masses", but
> when an NT[hates it]/Novell admin watched me install FreeBSD last
> week his opinion of sysinstall was that it was about the cleanest
> and most straight forward install program he's seen. Guess he,
> like I, is more concerned with functionality than flash. :)
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jack O'Neill Systems Administrator / Systems Analyst
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
> Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for my PGP key.
> PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD
> enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
