|"David E. Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>I have a threaded appilcation that is only running on one processor.
|>I remember there was discussion about this in the past, and there was a
|>solution, I think it involved a patch.
|>
|>Any pointers?
|
|http://lt.tar.com
And don't be turned off
Otay, please tell me how to fix:
===> usr.sbin/ifmcstat
cc -O -pipe -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c
gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.8 > ifmcstat.8.gz
/usr/src/usr.sbin/ifmcstat/ifmcstat.c: In function `main':
/usr/src/usr.sbin/
%
%:
%:On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 10:21:48AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
%:> Everyone, make sure you are using at least version 1.47 of
%:> ffs_softdep.c.
%:
%:I have.
%
%Wait a sec. I've reviewed all the messages from you and I think something
%got mixed together. I'm not convinc
I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying
ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying
ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying
ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495WARNING: WAIT_READY active=ATA_ACTIVE_ATA
falling back to PI
%It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %>
%> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
%> %>
%> %> ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying
%> %> ad0: UDMA CRC WRITE ERROR blk# 1140495 retrying
%&
I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
Russell
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:23:14 2000
|
|In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
|Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
|
|Did this problem just start, or has it been there for aw
%> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %> %>
%> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
%...
%
%>
%> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test
%> things like IO... g
%> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
%> %> %>
%> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
%...
%
%>
%> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test
%> things like IO... g
%
%On 27-Jan-2000 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
% |
% |> 3. On the first reboot after installing, the keyboard was in a funny
% |> state.
% |
% | Urk, can't reproduce it. I need a reproducible sequence of operations
% | before we'll have any hope of tackling this one.
% |
% |> Control-alt-d
I've been using the dc driver without a hitch
but when I updated to current two days ago dc stopped
working. Symptoms are no link light on the hub and
ifconfig reports . Lights are on on the
NIC though. Enumerating the varieties of media/mediaopt
has no effect. Fortunately, there is the de dr
|Hi,
|
|Ever since the libtermcap / libncurses consolidation, change emacs has
|problems positioning the cursor and properly updating the screen for
|character-only devices like the console. It also affects the display
|in an xterm in non-X mode, i.e., when DISPLAY is *not* set.
|
|This is emacs
|"Russell L. Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|> Yup! And also for 19.34b... I've searched all over for the
|> source of this problem, glad to know I'm not alone. However,
|> it only affects one of my three -current boxes, so apparently there is
|
Hi,
I'm trying to track down a problem with threads, C++ exceptions and ACE
on -current. Is the appended little program supposed to work?
If not, why not? It SIGABRTs immediately after the last throw
with egcs-2.95.2, and also with a month old or so egcs-2.91.66,
stock cc. Also with LinuxThrea
Hi folks,
%On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
%
%> Any objections to the following?
%
%I don't mind at all ... I was wondering about just taking out the ability
%to even USE -O2 in the compiler, but there're probably *some* non-kernel
%related reasons for using it, and we shouldn't block
%Wm Brian McCane wrote:
%>
%> I have an IBM T20 laptop that I want to run FreeBSD on. I have run
%
%BTW, I just found that this is covered on the FAQ.
Otay, I must be blind. Where in http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/book.html
is this?
Thanks!
Russell
%--
%Daniel C. Sobral (
d...@tar.com said:
%For kernel threading you just use libc. Whether or not libc generates
% thread safe (re-entrant) calls depends on whether its also linked
%with a library that 1) sets __isthreaded to a non-zero value, 2) has a
%_spinlock() implementationm, and 3) implements the functions
%flock
|Maybe having just one pthread.h that pulls in the required headers
|based on a switch (eg. -DLINUXTHREADS) is the way to go?
Doing this makes linuxthread support more or less "official", I would
think.
I am for it.
Russell
|
|--
|Richard Seamman, Jr. email: d...@tar.com
|5182 N. Map
[...]
%We spend so much of our time looking up our own collective asses searching
%for the meaning of life that it is no wonder FreeBSD doesn't feel like it
%has a clear direction for the future. All people seem to want to do is
%stomp on others who try to contribute something.
Come on John, thi
%>
%> You've probably already seen this:
%>
%> "Scheduler Activations: Effective Kernel Support for the User-Level
%> Management of Parallelism."
%> http://www.acm.org/pubs/citations/proceedings/ops/121132/p95-anderson/>
%>
%And here is the abstract:
%
%
%http://www.acm.org/pubs/toc/Abstracts/07
%On Sat, 27 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
%
%> > I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own,
%> > selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from
%> > this.
%>
%> Is that to say that you prefer it over egcs 1.1.1? If so, why?
%
%I have found egcs to
John Dyson extemporised:
%Julian Elischer said:
%>
%>
%> On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
%> > You may try my patch at http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi, which would allow
%> > linux threads to run on SMP.
%>
%> I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed
%> for
%I'm running -current from a couple of weeks ago. I recently re-compiled
%XFree86 to ELF - which works, and re-compiled emacs-19.34b - which won't
%work with X11, though it does work inside an Xterm. My old aout emacs
%still works (with old aout libraries - the re-compiled aout libraries
%seem to
Trial upgrade from a laptop running stable just fine for the last
six months to current (GENERIC) is still failing with the same symptoms:
On board rl0 comes up just fine, but a transfer hangs
after about 150KB or so. After a minute or two, the laptop reboots.
That's at 100BaseTX, plus the vari
Perhaps there's a nice search string that will cough up what
to do, if there's hope? This laptop is perfectly stable with
STABLE. (But no sound or acpi...)
Thanks,
Russell
: Trial upgrade from a laptop running stable just fine for the last
: six months to current (GENERIC) is still failing
Ok-dokey, over to linux it goes. Rats.
Russell
:
:
: Perhaps there's a nice search string that will cough up what
: to do, if there's hope? This laptop is perfectly stable with
: STABLE. (But no sound or acpi...)
:
: Thanks,
: Russell
:
:
:
: : Trial upgrade from a laptop running stab
cp *.gz target:/usr/tmp
:
: On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Russell L. Carter wrote:
:
: > rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fbf7 flags 3 len 2992 > max 1514)
: > rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type fbf7 flags 3 len 2992 > max 1514)
: > rl0: discard oversize frame (ether type 2e3d
anything to get better info,
for instance, is there something to look for if I dropped
into the debugger after the first time rl0 wedged, but
before the whole system wedged tight? Way at the bottom
is the original dmesg.
Best,
Russell
:
: On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Russell L. Carter wrote:
:
Well, um, if you look for messages from me last June and then again
several times recently you'll find we are a club of three, at least.
I can't actually manually ifconfig it either, it comes up the
first time fine, but I can wedge my machine with a few large
transfers.
I got a couple of hints v
%On Tue, Apr 13, 1999 at 03:16:01PM -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
%> To facilate auto detection of the local threading environment,
%> it would be nice if the -?thread options set all the necessary
%> compiler/linker flags. It is a common practace for such
%> options to specify both compilation a
%Hmm, I missed that. I took -lc out, but now I get this:
%
[...]
%/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_sigsuspend'
%/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_nanosleep'
%/usr/local/lib/liblthread.so.0: undefined reference to `_fork'
%/usr/local/lib/liblthread.s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/14 15:58, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Mark Johnston
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:39:37PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Mark Johnston
>>> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
Am I the only one attempting to maintain a local cluster using
a buildworld server and mounting /usr/src/ and /usr/obj/ via NFS?
I intermittently run into installworld failures, usually
in sys/boot/i386 but occasionally e.g. cddl/lib where
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/14 20:51, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 08:37:26PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Am I the only one attempting to maintain a local cluster using a
>> buildworld server and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ian,
On 10/06/14 08:29, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-05 at 20:37 -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
[...]
>> I intermittently run into installworld failures, usually in
>> sys/boot/i386 but occasionally e.g. cddl/lib wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote:
> * I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl
> vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
>
[...]
> PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
> ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
>>> PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
>>> ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0
>>
>> Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4 (I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So the ztest link fails looking for spa_maxblocksize, which
is defined in
sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa_misc.c
I don't see which lib it is included in. One of zpool, zfs,
or zfs_core, apparently.
As my build system is root on zf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On current r273808, make buildworld in a stable/10 tree fails
with:
building shared library libc.so.7
/usr/bin/ld: _umtx_unlock.So: relocation R_X86_64_32 against
`SYS__umtx_unlock' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
On 09/17/15 10:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El dÃa Thursday, September 17, 2015 a las 11:02:07AM -0400, Kris Moore
escribió:
On 09/17/2015 09:48, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El dÃa Thursday, September 17, 2015 a las 10:41:43PM +0900, Lundberg, Johannes
escribió:
Same here. I would personally
On 09/17/15 11:42, Adrian Chadd wrote:
run -HEAD on it. The wifi works great (it's atheros.)
Excellent to hear. When I get back from traveling
I'll bring up -HEAD.
Thanks,
Russell
All that's missing is haswell graphics.
-a
On 17 September 2015 at 11:23, Russell L
On 04/19/16 11:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 04/19/16 10:55, Roger Marquis wrote:
Please, consider ops and admins, who must support old installations,
often made by other, not-reachable, people, and stuff like this,
Ops and admins such as myself are exactly the ones who will benefit most
On 01/17/17 10:38, Michael Ware wrote:
Good day,
Does anyone know if NFS 4.1 (not 4.0) is available in FreeBSD 11? I have
not been able to find any documentation around this.
Thanks
Yes, though I'm not sure what specific feature you're looking for.
FreeBSD interoperates with my linux NFS 4.1 s
On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:51:40 + Brooks Davis wrote
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
OK I'm chasing -CURRENT, and I performed an initial
install, followed by a new world/kernel && ports about a
mos ago. Last Friday, I svn upped the sy
On 04/06/17 10:26, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 06:18:37PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
On 04/05/17 15:32, Chris H wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 21:51:40 + Brooks Davis wrote
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Chris H wrote:
OK I'm chasing -CURRENT, and I perf
On 08/13/14 17:37, Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 15:19:16 -0700
> Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Thiago,
>>
>> I really liked the blog articles you wrote:
>>
>> http://thiagoperrotta.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/here-be-dragons-freebsd-overview-part-i/
>> http://thiagoperrotta.wor
Greetings,
I have been happily using an AMD 5600G box for about 9 months
on -current with zero hiccups.
After performing my quarterly git pull + buildworld + installworld
+ pkg update + pkg upgrade, no packages that require graphics
work. This is broad based, from kitty to mpv, thunderbird, and
So ok, it's good to code to RFCs. OTOH, state actors are a thing now.
Alice & Bob's protocols need to be perfect. State actors watch for
mistakes.
Here I commit heresy, by A) top posting, and B) by just saying, why
not make it easy, first, to tunnel NFSv4 sessions through
e.g. net/wireguard o
On 2020-09-18 16:28, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Oh, and I forgot to mention name<->id# mapping.
> If using AUTH_SYS (not kerberos), then you have the
> choice of running "nfsuserd" or setting these two sysctls to 1.
> vfs.nfs.enable_uidtostring=1
> vfs.nfsd.enable_stringtouid=1
> --> This makes the ser
On 2020-09-20 12:28, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Just my +100500 to this.
>
> On 20/09/2020 18:03, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> On 2020-09-19, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>>
>>> Hrm. Maybe what I hear others saying, tho, and not entirely being
replied
>>> to is just a nice concise document of the why.
On 1/23/21 10:22 AM, driesm.michi...@gmail.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org On Behalf Of Malcolm Matalka
Sent: Saturday, 23 January 2021 17:43
To: FreeBSD Current
Subject: Which branch in git is 13.0-current?
I upgraded my src checkout to git, and
Greetings,
I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is
causing a hesitancy. And that is, my main raidz2 system has
a system boot zfs mirror pair that has boot partition size
(Mediasize) of 64K, and when I tried to zpool upgrade that pool a
year or 2 ago I got some scary me
On 2/11/21 5:43 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
Sorry, meant 256 KB or 512 KB, not MB!
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:43 PM Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 4:35 PM Russell L. Carter
wrote:
Greetings,
I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is
causing a hesitancy
On 2/11/21 7:46 PM, Dennis Clarke via freebsd-current wrote:
On 2/11/21 8:57 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:34:40PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote:
Greetings,
I really want to jump from stable/12 to stable/13 but one thing is
causing a hesitancy. And that is, my main
On 2/11/21 9:34 PM, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Feb 11, 2021, at 7:13 PM, Russell L. Carter wrote:
root@terpsichore> gpart show
=> 34 625142381 da0 GPT (298G)
341281 freebsd-boot (64K)
16283886082 freebsd-swap (4.0G)
8388770 61675364
55 matches
Mail list logo
