> > I do think we should provide something in ports as an interim solution.
> > There are other 3rd party applications looking to drop FreeBSD support
> > because we are missing APIs that almost all other OS's have. I'm fine
> > if the interim lives in ports and that we don't import substandard
>
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:00:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 7:17:01 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:08:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17
> Do we have a wiki page listing the functions in libm we are missing?
> Having some kind of place to track progress and figure out what
> exactly is needed is the first step to getting these APIs into shape.
I already suggested this, and mentioned:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/MissingMathStuff
> Als
Hello all.
First of all, I'm not on current, but on stable:
FreeBSD pcbsd-6648 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #8: Fri May 18
16:12:29 UTC 2012
r...@build9x64.pcbsd.org:/usr/obj/builds/i386/pcbsd-build90/fbsd-source/9.0/sys/GENERIC
i386
I have lenovo s10-2 (which is have some unsupported broadcom
Hi,
Please file a bug. :)
WEP shouldn't be broken in 9.x, that was before all of my TX
aggregation changes for 802.11n support.
WEP worked fine for me when I was using it a couple weeks ago. Would
you please provide further information in the bug, such as what the
key length is, which key slots
2012/6/1 Adrian Chadd :
> Hi,
>
> Please file a bug. :)
>
Here it goes:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168530
> WEP shouldn't be broken in 9.x, that was before all of my TX
> aggregation changes for 802.11n support.
>
Don't know if it is... since my other stuff working in same networ
On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 31 May 2012 08:45, John Baldwin wrote:
> > I do think we should provide something in ports as an interim solution.
> > There are other 3rd party applications looking to drop FreeBSD support
> > because we are missing APIs that almost all
On 2012-05-28 1:25, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Here's a revised patch (based on something I brought up earlier)
> that converts periodic over to an rc.subr-like paradigm.
> This can be directly applied to HEAD; you will need to backport
> r231849 first if you want to apply the patch to 9-STABL
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 07:20:42 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-May-30 13:27:03 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >On 2012-May-29 02:18:25 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> >>Then you should try to profile it - my script basically runs
> >>delete-old delete-old-libs for every knob (131 of them), an
On 2012-Jun-01 20:50:24 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>Why is xargs even calling /bin/echo when "utility" is not specified.
Because that's what it's documented as doing.
>Shouldn't it just print a certain number of arguments (one in this
>case)?
The current approach is simpler - there's always
On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
>> we can use? Would it be okay to has slow, but accurate versions of
>> these functions as a stopgap?
>
>Peter Jeremy
On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
>>> we can use? Would it be okay to has slow, but accurate versions of
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:16:03PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
>
On 1 June 2012 23:52, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Of course. Sit down and write code.
If I ever find the time, I just might. Do we have a wiki page listing
the set of functions which we don't yet have?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailin
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:04:58AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 23:52, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Of course. ??Sit down and write code.
>
> If I ever find the time, I just might. Do we have a wiki page listing
> the set of functions which we don't yet have?
>
I don't know. I don't
15 matches
Mail list logo
