On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:16:03PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy <pe...@rulingia.com> wrote: > > On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote: > >>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions > >>> we can use? Would it be okay to has slow, but accurate versions of > >>> these functions as a stopgap? > >> > >>Peter Jeremy more or less has a stopgap already ready judging by the > >>comments > >>in the thread thus far. > > > > There's probably an hours work by either stephen@ or myself to adapt > > the work I did on cephes in Sage to a standalone FreeBSD port. > > Unfortunately, both stephen@ & I are currently otherwise occupied and > > other comments in this thread suggest that the inclusion of such a port > > would be strongly opposed. > > > > Note that cephes isn't "slow but accurate" - it's reasonably fast but > > naive and therefore dodgy in edge cases. > > Yes, I was asking if any of the former type exist. > Optimally we would want fast and accurate - but it doesn't currently exist. > Fast, but inaccurate has been strongly objected to. > > Is there third option? >
Of course. Sit down and write code. -- Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"