On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: >>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions >>> we can use? Would it be okay to has slow, but accurate versions of >>> these functions as a stopgap? >> >>Peter Jeremy more or less has a stopgap already ready judging by the comments >>in the thread thus far. > > There's probably an hours work by either stephen@ or myself to adapt > the work I did on cephes in Sage to a standalone FreeBSD port. > Unfortunately, both stephen@ & I are currently otherwise occupied and > other comments in this thread suggest that the inclusion of such a port > would be strongly opposed. > > Note that cephes isn't "slow but accurate" - it's reasonably fast but > naive and therefore dodgy in edge cases.
Yes, I was asking if any of the former type exist. Optimally we would want fast and accurate - but it doesn't currently exist. Fast, but inaccurate has been strongly objected to. Is there third option? -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
