My gigabit link between my Windows XP box and my FreeBSD box is always
really slow after booting FreeBSD, until I go like this:
ifconfig em0 down ; ifconfig em0 up
..and then I get top speed again. Ping goes from 9ms+ to 0.2ms-. This
happens regardless of whether the FreeBSD box is booted first,
I needed to do some tcpdump from my box on the rl0 interface. The IP was
changed to one that dosn't match our network and I noticed that
everything had a 3 min delay(both traffic in and out from the
interface), my current build is from yesterday and the box didn't have
any heavy load. As soon a
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:06:10AM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> I needed to do some tcpdump from my box on the rl0 interface. The IP was
> changed to one that dosn't match our network and I noticed that
> everything had a 3 min delay(both traffic in and out from the
> interface), my current buil
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:15:54AM -0600, Robert Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:06:10AM +0100, John Angelmo wrote:
> > I needed to do some tcpdump from my box on the rl0 interface. The IP was
> > changed to one that dosn't match our network and I noticed that
> > everything had a 3 m
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mark Murray wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov writes:
> > KerberosIV support was recently dropped from HEAD, but Mark
> > forgot to remove some vestiges. I've sent him a patch on
> > March 14, but he seems off-line for a moment.
>
> I'm on-line, just busy with other things. Please do N
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:08:01PM +0100, Joris Vandalon wrote:
> > -l kills buffered output, i.e. waiting for a large amount of data before
> >it starts writing
>
> -l doesnt kill bufferd output, in contrary, it makes the output bufferd.
>
>-l Make stdout line buffered. Useful
Hi,
I updated XFree86 this morning after a cvsup using portupgrade -r...did
all packages for XFree86 (Server, libraries etc. etc.)
I now have a problem with GDM...
I can log in as root using the GDM, but if I log in as another user, it
pops a message up about my session not lasting longer than 1
Thus spake Till Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cat test.c
> #include "math.h"
>
> int main()
> {
> int base=8;
> int dim=2;
> float res;
> res=pow((float)base,(float)dim);
> printf("%f\n",res);
> return 0;
> }
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ gcc -lm test.c
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CARTER Anthony wrote:
Hi,
I updated XFree86 this morning after a cvsup using portupgrade -r...did
all packages for XFree86 (Server, libraries etc. etc.)
I now have a problem with GDM...
I can log in as root using the GDM, but if I log in as another user, it
pops a message up about my session not
From: User Takawata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ACPI suspend problem (ThinkPad X23)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:22:57 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It seems that Your machine does not support S1 sleep.
> See the result of
> # acpidump |grep _S1
>
> If there is no line like
> Name(\
Well, the .xsession is executable...
adding my user to the gdm group didn't help...
SUID...New to this...can you explain a little about this...?
XFree86 is dependent on wrapper...it won't uninstall...I can force
it...but...
Anthony
On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 14:43, walt wrote:
> CARTER Anthony wrot
¤¹ä·Â¡ÓÅѧà»ç¹âäÍéǹÁÒ¡¢Öé¹·Ø¡·Õ ¾.Í.ËÔ§ ÃÈ. ¾.. ¾Ã±ÔµÒ ªÑÂÍÓ¹ÇÂ
¼ÙéÍӹǡÒÃàǪÈÒʵÃì¿×鹿٠âç¾ÂÒºÒžÃÐÁ§¡Ø¯à¡ÅéÒ ºÃÃÂÒÂàÃ×èͧ
"¡Ô¹ÍÂèÒ§äÃãËéËèÒ§ä¡ÅâäËÑÇã¨áÅÐâäÍéǹ" 㹵͹˹Ö觢ͧ¡ÒúÃÃÂÒÂ
¼ÙéºÃÃÂÒ¡ÅèÒÇÇèÒ
"ÊÔ觷Õè¾Ö§µÃÐ˹ѡ¤×Í ¼ÙéªÒÂäÁè¤ÇÃãËéÃͺàÍÇà¡Ô¹ 36 ¹ÔéÇ ËÔ§äÁè¤ÇÃà¡Ô¹ 32 ¹ÔéÇ
¶éÒÁÒ
¤¹ä·Â¡ÓÅѧà»ç¹âäÍéǹÁÒ¡¢Öé¹·Ø¡·Õ ¾.Í.ËÔ§ ÃÈ. ¾.. ¾Ã±ÔµÒ ªÑÂÍÓ¹ÇÂ
¼ÙéÍӹǡÒÃàǪÈÒʵÃì¿×鹿٠âç¾ÂÒºÒžÃÐÁ§¡Ø¯à¡ÅéÒ ºÃÃÂÒÂàÃ×èͧ
"¡Ô¹ÍÂèÒ§äÃãËéËèÒ§ä¡ÅâäËÑÇã¨áÅÐâäÍéǹ" 㹵͹˹Ö觢ͧ¡ÒúÃÃÂÒÂ
¼ÙéºÃÃÂÒ¡ÅèÒÇÇèÒ
"ÊÔ觷Õè¾Ö§µÃÐ˹ѡ¤×Í ¼ÙéªÒÂäÁè¤ÇÃãËéÃͺàÍÇà¡Ô¹ 36 ¹ÔéÇ ËÔ§äÁè¤ÇÃà¡Ô¹ 32 ¹ÔéÇ
¶éÒÁÒ
Hi there,
it seemd that pkg_add coredumps while doing pkg_add -r $package
pkg_add $package seems work ok.
anyone else experiencing the same problem?
-example-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] strace]# pkg_add -r lftp
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] strace]#
-end example-
Regards,
Joris
Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:06:45AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:41:23AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Can someone please investigate?
> > > >
> > > > This was
pkg_add -r coredumps for me on a system built Mar 18, but not on one built
Mar 3.
Scott
From: "Joris Vandalon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi there,
>
> it seemd that pkg_add coredumps while doing pkg_add -r $package
> pkg_add $package seems work ok.
> anyone else experiencing the same problem?
>
> -
Xfree requires wrapper but seems to break GDM for user logins. Is this
normal, and can I force un-install wrapper without breaking anything?
Anthony
XFreeOn Wed, 2003-03-19 at 14:43, walt wrote:
> CARTER Anthony wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I updated XFree86 this morning after a cvsup using portupgrad
Generic Viagra is now available to consumers
As low as $2.25 per dose (50 mg)
No Doctor's Consutation required
"Silagra is as good as Viagra - just cheaper!"
Costs over 65% less than Brand Name
(Generic Sildenafil Citrate (Silagra)
and Viagra. both consist of 100 mg of
sildenafil citrate)
Priv
Quoting Joris Vandalon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> it seemd that pkg_add coredumps while doing pkg_add -r $package
> pkg_add $package seems work ok.
> anyone else experiencing the same problem?
Yeah!
Wanted to pkg_add -r and it coredumped. I tried to cvsup and remake it but
it's not an
wrapper is needed to run script startx by ordinary user, not root... Seems
like gdm works well for me without wrapper.
Shall we need to make XFree86-4.3.0,1 an option to install without wrapper
package?
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Doug Barton writes:
> > > For you, the easiest way to jump is to remove MAKE_KERBEROS4
> > > from /etc/make.conf.
> >
> > Yes. You should not be using that; it is well broken now.
>
> Is it worth putting an #ifdef in /usr/src/Makefile to stop this in its
> tracks? Not everyone running -current is
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:19:59 +0100
Joris Vandalon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> it seemd that pkg_add coredumps while doing pkg_add -r $package
> pkg_add $package seems work ok.
> anyone else experiencing the same problem?
>
> -example-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] strace]# pkg_add -r lft
Here's a patch.
Des,
is this ok with you?
Cheers.
--
Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9
Index: lib/libfetch/ftp.c
===
RCS
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:28:06PM -0500, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Here's a patch.
Tnx, works fine now
Regards,
Joris
>
> Des,
> is this ok with you?
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3
Hi,
I'm seeing these messages on a -current from last weekend:
an0: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 1522 > max 1514)
an0: discard oversize frame (ether type 0 flags 3 len 1530 > max 1514)
an0: record length mismatch -- expected 104, got 852 for Rid ff11
an0: record length mismatc
I have updated my patches for:
dc pcn rl sf sis sk ste ti tl vr wb xl
They have been compile tested but I only have an rl card so I'd appreciate
feedback.
Patches are at:
http://www.root.org/~nate/freebsd/if_pci/
Clean up locking and resource management for pci/if_*
- Remove locking of t
Dear Hackers,
Does anyone know what is the proper handling for USB IOERROR status
in USB transfer callback?
here is my problem. the driver opens bulk pipe and submits incoming
USB bulk transfer. the USB device is detached while the transfer is
still pending and pipe is still open. USB transfer cal
I'm hoping someone can help me debug the following problem (a fix would
be welcome too :) ).
I'm using mgetty to receive faxes and to accept a dialup ppp
connection. I used to use something called ppplogin to handle the
incoming ppp but decided to switch to pppd with FreeBSD 5.0 because my
ppp
I had forgotten to cvsup before generating the diff so I have updated them
in place after resolving conflicts. Only rl and xl have changed.
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Apparently, On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:37:43AM -0800,
Nate Lawson said words to the effect of;
> I have updated my patches for:
> dc pcn rl sf sis sk ste ti tl vr wb xl
> They have been compile tested but I only have an rl card so I'd appreciate
> feedback.
>
> Patches are at:
> h
On 10:39-0800, Mar 19, 2003, Tod Oace wrote:
> I'm hoping someone can help me debug the following problem (a fix would
> be welcome too :) ).
>
> I'm using mgetty to receive faxes and to accept a dialup ppp
> connection. I used to use something called ppplogin to handle the
> incoming ppp but deci
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:38:30AM +0100, Andrew Mace wrote:
> > Hello there, I recently installed the FreeBSD 5.0 CURRENT (dated
> 03/14/03)
> > and today I got the following error after I rebooted the system:
> >
> > syncing disks,buffers remaining... 3 3
> > done
> > Slab at 0xc2b84fcc,freei
On (2003/03/19 20:43), Andrew Mace wrote:
> Thanks for Your reply. Your right, I'm in the wrong league here :-). I had
> 5.0 RELEASE installed before, but the jdk1.4 port wouldn't compile and there
> is no binary package. But now that I have it compiled and packaged can I just
> install it on 5.0
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 11:16 AM, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On 10:39-0800, Mar 19, 2003, Tod Oace wrote:
The problem I'm having is that when an incoming ppp connectionattempt
is made my FreeBSD 5.0 machine freezes up. I can't even get to the
debugger with Ctrl-Alt-Esc like I normally can. H
On 18-Mar-2003 Joris Vandalon wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm having a problem compling a current kernel with HTT
> it seemd the option APIC_IO gives me some trouwbels (see output below)
> is there anyone who had similar problems or even how got HTT working on current?
The APIC_IO option is required
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:27:46PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 18-Mar-2003 Joris Vandalon wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm having a problem compling a current kernel with HTT
> > it seemd the option APIC_IO gives me some trouwbels (see output below)
> > is there anyone who had similar probl
Aaron Wohl writes:
| Im trying to run pptp under 5.0 -current. (first time with mpd so
| probably some config issue)
|
| I get these errors:
| mpd: pid 1102, version 3.13 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 09:35
| 17-Mar-2003)
| [pptp0] can't create socket node: No such file or directory
| mpd: local IP address
> | My gigabit link between my Windows XP box and my FreeBSD box is
always
> | really slow after booting FreeBSD, until I go like this:
> |
> | ifconfig em0 down ; ifconfig em0 up
> |
> | ..and then I get top speed again. Ping goes from 9ms+ to 0.2ms-.
This
> | happens regardless of whether the Fr
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 10:07:21AM -0500, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> > I think I see the problem. I'll try to get a fix committed by
> > tonight.
>
> Okay, try revision 1.35.
Will do, thanks!
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
It's been a while since we've pulled in Intel's acpi-ca work and there are
a number of bugs fixed since the October 2002 version in -current. Could
someone generate a diff for the latest release and post it for
testing? If enough people indicate there are no problems, it would be
nice to have an
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that
> the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It
> polls all its ports, so it makes sense that a swi would get clogged.
>
> I thought it might be sufficent to unload
Nate Lawson writes:
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that
> > the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It
> > polls all its ports, so it makes sense that a swi would get clogged.
> >
> > I
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Nate Lawson writes:
> > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > > This does not happen if I do not have rp.ko loaded. I suspect that
> > > the rocketport card needs some setup when power is restored. It
> > > polls all its ports, so it ma
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 08:28, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> Shouldn't a driver without a suspend/resume implementation implicitly
> veto the suspend? That's how OS-X does it.
I don't think so - the reason being that when a lot of this stuff was
written it was done for APM. Since the OS doesn't _usually
Daniel O'Connor writes:
> Restart X? :-)
I wish. The board seems totally gone after an ACPI suspend. This seems to
be a common problem with ATI cards.
Drew
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:41:17 -0500 (EST)
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Daniel O'Connor writes:
> > Restart X? :-)
>
> I wish. The board seems totally gone after an ACPI suspend. This seems to
> be a common problem with ATI cards.
Work-arou
CARTER Anthony wrote:
Xfree requires wrapper but seems to break GDM for user logins. Is this
normal, and can I force un-install wrapper without breaking anything?
Excuse me, I'm a bonehead. You don't need to uninstall wrapper, just
change this symbolic link:
/usr/X11R6/bin/X@ -> Xwrapper-4
to thi
Hello gentlemen,
I have to note that currently it isn't really possible to compile
-CURRENT by GCC 2.95.x in the way it has to be. Buildkernel is
broken in several places by different means, however GCC 3.2.x
passes them successfully, even with no warnings shown.
Namely, first problem is in bsd.k
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:21:13AM +, RMH wrote:
> I have to note that currently it isn't really possible to compile
> -CURRENT by GCC 2.95.x in the way it has to be. Buildkernel is
> broken in several places by different means, however GCC 3.2.x
> passes them successfully, even with no warning
Out of curiosity:
what on earth makes you think that compiling -current kernel using older
build tools has to be supported?
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:21:13 + (GMT)
RMH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello gentlemen,
>
> I have to note that currently it isn't really possible to compile
> -CURREN
Lets all be thankful as hell
Because the statuue of the Liberty has began to smell.
--
Regards
Cliff
[ Thi mail has been checked as virus-free ]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:21:13AM +, RMH wrote:
> > I have to note that currently it isn't really possible to compile
> > -CURRENT by GCC 2.95.x in the way it has to be. Buildkernel is
> > broken in several places by different means, however GCC 3.2.x
> > passes them successfully, even with
I realise what wrapper is for, but if I type pkg_delete wrappe-1.0_2 at
the command line, I get:
pkg_delete: package 'wrapper-1.0_2' is required by these other packages
and may not be deinstalled:
XFree86-4.3.0,1
I never installed wrapper, but when I did a portupgrade to the latest
XFree, I guess
Mike Makonnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is this ok with you?
Ugh, yes.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
54 matches
Mail list logo
