I got the following panic twice when starting xawtv using 5.2 BETA (CVS
from Oct 23)
panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) sellck
@/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:1145
I don't think it is directly related to bktr since the last commit there
was ~3 months ago. Here is the dmesg output for compl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr.
" writes:
>On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> I have for myself recently taken a break from all active FreeBSD
>> development because I find the environment about as pleasant as a
>> kindergarten right before lunch.
>
>Does
At 00:23 26/11/2003 -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote:
Static /bin/sh:
real385m29.977s
user111m58.508s
sys 93m14.450s
Dynamic /bin/sh:
real455m44.852s
user113m17.807s
sys 103m16.509s
Given that user+sys << real in both cases, it looks like you're running
out of m
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: * M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 12:07]:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > "boyd, rounin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : i see that there some doubt about whether running lot
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 12:07]:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "boyd, rounin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of
> : shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you
> : use make? lots of shells get run
* boyd, rounin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 05:16]:
> i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of
> shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you
> use make? lots of shells get run and they run small
> (one line?) scripts.
Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I g
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:51:15PM -0800, walt wrote:
> Brooks Davis answered:
>
> walt asked:
> >>What does 'buildworld' give us that the new kernel might need?
>
> >The correct toolchain including the compiler and config(8).
>
> Okay, thanks, that helps.
>
> Just thinking out loud about worst
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: sio2 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 11 flags 0x4 slot 0 on pccard0
: sio2: type 16550A
: sio2: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode
: The SIO2 is my Toshiba 3CXM056-BNW modem, and is what
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > ...Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades
: > when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is
: > installed, "make world" is increasingly unlikely to work...
:
: The recen
Hi,
I'm preparing new machine with 5-current. First, I installed a snapshot on
Feb 21 2003. It works well. From the beginning of this week, I started
updating it to the latest, and found the problem.
The box is built with following parts.
o ASUS P4G8X
o P4 2.53GHz
o 2GB memory
o Seagate ST340810
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used
> > to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't.
>
> Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 13:25, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than
> > previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.
>
> Uh... you must not k
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those
> >>recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break.
> >
> >My stance is that no failure mode needs to
> >be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /.
>
>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than
> previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.
Uh... you must not know what you are talking about. GCC *COMPILES*
slower as it does a
Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:05:02PM +0100, boyd, rounin wrote:
> > From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an
> > > error indication from the library call.
> >
> > errno is only meaningful after
Brooks Davis answered:
walt asked:
What does 'buildworld' give us that the new kernel might need?
The correct toolchain including the compiler and config(8).
Okay, thanks, that helps.
Just thinking out loud about worst-case examples for people who
do routinely use 'make world' (like I have for s
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:44:18PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> > After watching the recent shared/dynamic threads, and reading the
> > archives from five or six years ago, I have a question...
> >
> > Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> > whic
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used
> to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't.
Except that we still have /stand. It should be shot, but some won't let
it go...
___
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> I tried(!) to use the following modem on my 5.2-BETA (actually -CURRENT from
> a week or so ago), and the machine HUNG on the OPEN.
>
>
> usb0: USB revision 1.0
> usb1: USB revision 1.0
> fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1)
> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> After watching the recent shared/dynamic threads, and reading the
> archives from five or six years ago, I have a question...
>
> Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> which loads shared objects and fixes the symbol tables, yes?
No.
Dynamic link
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > 5.2-BETA kernel?
>
> You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
> Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
Sort of. I do have three xl(4) NICs in my s
Gents,
I'm having difficulties trying out the 5.2-BETA, preparing for the
release. I would greatly appreciate it if anyone has some time at hand
to help (re)solve a problem that occures with my 5.2-BETA kernel (26 nov
2003).
The situation is the following: I have tried to upgrade a system
(http
> Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> 5.2-BETA kernel?
You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of
> adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do with it
> is make a better PAM out of it?
The important thing is that NSS allows to plug modules such as LDAP
I tried(!) to use the following modem on my 5.2-BETA (actually -CURRENT from
a week or so ago), and the machine HUNG on the OPEN.
usb0: USB revision 1.0
usb1: USB revision 1.0
fwohci0: OHCI version 1.0 (ROM=1)
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1: at port 0x2e
Hi,
I seem to have difficulties with verrevpath in IPFW2 (current kernel,
cvsupped a few hours ago) which APPEARS to not match - or am I too
whatever to configure ipfw2 properly?
Excerpt from "ipfw show":
| 0010038 3216 allow ip from any to any via lo0
| 00200 0 0 deny ip from any
i was just looking through my daily reports from my new 5.2 beta box and
found this in dmesg.
lock order reversal
1st 0xc08f7ce0 UMA lock (UMA lock) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1201
2nd 0xc1031100 system map (system map) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2210
Stack backtrace:
lock order reversal
1st
Gents,
(Firsthand I sorry if this E-Mail is sent twice to the list, got client
rejected from mx1.)
I'm having difficulties trying out the 5.2-BETA, preparing for the
release. I would greatly appreciate it if anyone has some time at hand to
help (re)solve a problem that occures with my 5.2-BETA
Tony Finch wrote:
"Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not just the startup scripts, but ANY script. I dare say there's a long,
long list of scripts that use ~-expansion, to say nothing of the
homegrown ones we all have working quietly and forgotten for years.
It's required for POSIX
I upgraded my machine shortly after those changes with statfs ... upgrade
went well, but sound stop'd working ... the device is being detected:
pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
0xe0102000-0xe01020ff,0xe0101000-0xe01011ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0
pcm0:
and, from what I can tell,
Perfect!! This is exactly the thing I need. I will investigate. Memory
is an option, but this project is pretty much done. Knowing how to do
the bktr approach is something worth the excercise.
More RAM won't teach me anything new ;-)
Sean
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 16:09, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 18:43, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> If I remember correctly, Alan Cox intended to write a binary buddy
> allocator to handle the physical address space (or do coalescing another
> way, I'm not sure...) so that this particular problem is solved.
Another way to solve it is the
>> Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
>>
>> I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
>> am eager to figure out what's going on and recover the data.
EA> This isn't necessarily directed at you - I'm just using this email as a
EA> footstep to send this ge
At 2:48 PM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote:
What I am advocating is that FreeBSD-5 not marginalize and
restrict (make less flexible) basic infrastructure in order to get other
infrastructure working.
If you've got working, debugged code that works in the manner you
On Tuesday, 25 November 2003 at 10:48:44 -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
>> Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
>>
>> I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
>> am eager to figure out what's going on and recover the data.
>
> This isn't necessarily directe
At 11:27 PM +0100 11/25/03, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 11:50 AM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote:
... Or you can build an IPC mechanism that implements
the PAM functionality and then have programs which
would otherwise use PAM instead use the IPC mechanism.
Which is the whole
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:35:54PM -0800, walt wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> >...Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades
> >when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is
> >installed, "make world" is increasingly unlikely to work...
>
> The recen
Kevin Oberman wrote:
...Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades
when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is
installed, "make world" is increasingly unlikely to work...
The recent statfs changes demonstrated why the 'makeworld' > 'makekernel'
sequenc
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I have for myself recently taken a break from all active FreeBSD
> development because I find the environment about as pleasant as a
> kindergarten right before lunch.
Does this mean GEOM has been orphaned? Who now has the mantle for it
then?
-a
_
At 11:50 AM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote:
... Or you can build an IPC mechanism that implements the PAM
functionality and then have programs which would otherwise use PAM
instead use the IPC mechanism. Which is the whole point of having
the IPC mechanism in the first
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:12:16PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > acpi0: on motherboard
> > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_._REG]
> > (Node 0xc29b4660), AE_NOT_EXIST
> > acpi0: Could not initialise SystemIO handler: AE_NOT_EXIST
> > device_probe_and_attach:
:No, what you said was "not to tear out..the ability to generate static
:binaries". That's completely different, and is absolutely not what
:has happened, or what is planned. Static binaries continue to be
:supported, available, and work with the system NSS and PAM modules as
:before.
I thi
On 25 Nov, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Nov, Artur Poplawski wrote:
>> Artur Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On a 5.1-RE
On 25 Nov, Artur Poplawski wrote:
> Artur Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On a 5.1-RELEASE and 5.2-BETA machines I have
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:15:58PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to
> :> tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to
> :> generate static binaries, in the process.
> :
> :If this is what you t
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:39:11PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> My original opinion
> still stands... you guys are using this issue as an excuse to basically
> do away with static binaries, rather then fixing the real problem which
> is an inability to dynamically load modules in
On 24-Nov-2003 Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> Please also send the output of acpidump -t -d > jdp-P2.asl
I booted the 5.1R live CD in an attempt to get this output. I
discovered that the machine hangs the same way with 5.1R as it does
with -current. (When I originally installed 5.1R, the machine had
an
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:46:24PM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 a.d., Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> > The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an
> > error indication from the library call.
>
> Sorry, but I don't see your point. I know when to check for
Artur Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On a 5.1-RELEASE and 5.2-BETA machines I have been able to cause a panic
> like this:
:> is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to
:> tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to
:> generate static binaries, in the process.
:
:If this is what you think has happened, you're living in some parallel
:fantasy universe.
I
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Marco Wertejuk wrote:
> | Of course, make sure you don't have local changes in /etc/rc.d first.
>
> Shouldn't these be placed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
Sure. I was just being overly careful since I just suggested someone
rm -rf a directory.
-Nate
___
I've been experiencing a repeatable panic using ng_eiface(4) on -CURRENT
of the last few days.
Environment:
FreeBSD twiddle.local 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Tue Nov 25 19:28:22
UTC 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/data/work/usr/src/sys/TWIDDLE i386
Description:
Shutting down an ng_eiface no
| Of course, make sure you don't have local changes in /etc/rc.d first.
Shouldn't these be placed in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Marco Wertejuk - mwcis.com
Consulting & Internet Solutions
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:39:11PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> So, yes, I do think you guys are being lazy in that regard. If this
> is the path you've chosen to go then you have an obligation not to
> tear out major existing system capabilities, such as the ability to
> genera
:Matt, I'm talking about the de facto standard NSS, as found in Solaris
:and Linux; and now FreeBSD 5 [*] and soon NetBSD [**]. You are talking
:about some better mousetrap. The latter does not have any relevance
:to this thread, which is about dynamic linking in next release of
:FreeBSD.
:
:If
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:36:45PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What _REAL WORLD_ task does this slow down?
>
> I suspect 'make world' takes a serious hit.
It does not (Warner has quoted numbers a few times now).
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Descri
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:50:25AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Just not thinking out of the box, maybe.
Matt, I'm talking about the de facto standard NSS, as found in Solaris
and Linux; and now FreeBSD 5 [*] and soon NetBSD [**]. You are talking
about some better mousetrap. The latter doe
> acpi0: on motherboard
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0_._REG] (Node
> 0xc29b4660), AE_NOT_EXIST
> acpi0: Could not initialise SystemIO handler: AE_NOT_EXIST
> device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6
This is the source of the problems. When acp
:IMHO, it makes more sense to write NSS modules that do their own
:proxying than to make things even more complicated in libc. Those
:that are lightweight don't carry extra baggage; those that do can
:implement proxying in the most efficient manner for that particular
:backend, e.g. some calls ca
Would it be possible to get a copy of this script?
Please! :)
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:41:44PM -0800 I heard the voice of
David O'Brien, and lo! it spake thus:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:07:49PM -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote:
Would it be possible, through some make.co
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:57:10 -0800
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now we are moving on to V5 and 'world' is growing increasingly dangerous
> to use. Because changes are applied that will allow smooth upgrades
> when the kernel is built after the new system is built, but before it is
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, it was written:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2003 18:35, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > With a recent -current, I've noticed double prints for the last few
> > rc scripts, like this:
> >
> > Starting cron.
> > Local package initialization:.
> > Local package initialization:.
> > Additional
Update on xl0 issues and NFS issues:
I unfortunatly left my realtek network card in work so I'll do this
tomorrow night instead of tonight.
But I've now installed the absolute latest world/kernel on both server
and client again to see if the hang has gone.
I have noticed the NFS transfer hangs
At 10:09 AM -0600 11/25/03, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, I heard the voice of
David O'Brien, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible, through some make.conf magic, for
> > the end-user to set extra programs to be
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What _REAL WORLD_ task does this slow down?
I suspect 'make world' takes a serious hit.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
Since the interrupt changes, my dual Xeons based on the SE7500WV2 board
don't work with ACPI. Specificly, the onboard nics (em0 and em1)
appear to not be recieving interupts. Instead, they continiously get
watchdog timeouts. In a stock current, this is an instant panic. With
a minor fix to the
With a recent -current, I've noticed double prints for the last few rc
scripts, like this:
Starting cron.
Local package initialization:.
Local package initialization:.
Additional TCP options:.
Additional TCP options:.
Anyone else seeing this?
-Nate
___
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"boyd, rounin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of
: shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you
: use make? lots of shells get run and they run small
: (one line?) scripts.
make buildworld slow
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Someone must be using /bin/sh as a shell, because apparently someone
>spent a lot of time adding things like character input editing, filename
>completion, etc. We even use "sh" as the default in adduser(8).
Command-line editing is required for POSIX co
"Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Not just the startup scripts, but ANY script. I dare say there's a long,
>long list of scripts that use ~-expansion, to say nothing of the
>homegrown ones we all have working quietly and forgotten for years.
It's required for POSIX compliance.
To
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:47:29 +0300
> From: Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> * Kevin Oberman
At 9:19 AM -0600 11/25/03, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on
with life?
I still think we would be better off using 5.2-release for
collecting more experience with the *operational* issues of
having a dy
Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
am eager to figure out what's going on and recover the data.
This isn't necessarily directed at you - I'm just using this email as a
footstep to send this general comment -
I
Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
am eager to figure out what's going on and recover the data.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Err yes I did. Im trying to install a kernel.
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: Clement Laforet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 November 2003 16:26
> To: Lawrence Farr
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 4 -> 5 Problem
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:18:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:18:26 -
"Lawrence Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the Current target machine is from Thu Sep 25 14:32:19 GMT 2003,
> the stable one from Mon Mar 24 16:30:45 GMT 2003, and the
> src and obj are fresh from last night.
did you read /usr/src/UPDATING ?
20031112:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jacques A. Vidrine"
wri
tes:
> So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life?
I was thinking the same thing myself a few days ago.
Cheers,
--
Cy Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.komquats.com/
BC Government
I build 5-CURRENT every night, and NFS export src and obj
to my other CURRENT machines to update. I've been doing
this quite happily this way for a while. When I try to
do an installkernel on a stable machine, I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src# make installkernel
Bad system call (core dumped)
***
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:41:44PM -0800 I heard the voice of
David O'Brien, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:07:49PM -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> >
> > Would it be possible, through some make.conf magic, for the end-user to
> > set extra programs to be put into /rescue tha
Jacques A. Vidrine writes:
>
> So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life?
That certainly seems like the best compromise. Then we can end this
thread ;)
> That seems to have the most impact. We can also expend our efforts
> to improve dynamic linking performance
Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:06:12PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > How about Gordon's initial bootstone, which increased by 25%?
> > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16091.44150.539095.704531
> >
> > And I just did a "make clean" run in /usr/ports/archivers (by man
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:22:52PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote:
> Yep :).
>
> I feel like saying "set the default to static and make the dynamic bins
> the option" so
> the people who can't be bothered to compile their own system even
> though everyone
> I know does this for tuning purposes anyw
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:06:12PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> How about Gordon's initial bootstone, which increased by 25%?
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16091.44150.539095.704531
>
> And I just did a "make clean" run in /usr/ports/archivers (by manually
> mv'ing a static and dynamic
Hello,
On a 5.1-RELEASE and 5.2-BETA machines I have been able to cause a panic
like this:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 07:11:29PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> You don't need dynamic loading to get nsswitch type functionality. You
> only need dynamic loading if nobody is willing to write an IPC
> model to get the functionality. It's really silly to create such a
> fundamen
I recently cvsup'ed (last week anyway), and build/installed world/kernel
etc. Now, when I connect a cardbus card
(firewire cards, ethernet, wireless, etc), my broadcom bge0 interface
goes crazy, stops functioning, and I get this:
Nov 19 10:18:32 neutrino kernel: cardbus0: Resource not specifie
* Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20031125 02:39]: wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 06:07:03 -0800
> > From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS
> > Content-Type: text/p
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Enache Adrian wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 a.d., Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> > The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an
> > error indication from the library call.
>
> Sorry, but I don't see your point. I know when to check for errno.
> If you took
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:21:03AM +0100, Christian Laursen wrote:
+> I have been experiencing some random lockups after upgrading from
+> 5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-BETA.
+>
+> I then wen on and enabled all the debug options in my kernel config
+> hoping to be able to find the cause.
+>
+> But now I can
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 a.d., Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> The application is broken. You must only check errno if you get an
> error indication from the library call.
Sorry, but I don't see your point. I know when to check for errno.
If you took the little illustrating program for a real life exampl
On 2003.11.25 12:52:03 +0100, Schuendehuette Matthias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a bug in the release notes of CURRENT:
>
> In Chapter 2.3 "Userland Changes" of the ReleaseNotes of CURRENT I read
> about the Makefile variable WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT whereas
> /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 wants -DNO_DYNAMICRO
Hi,
There's a bug in the release notes of CURRENT:
In Chapter 2.3 "Userland Changes" of the ReleaseNotes of CURRENT I read
about the Makefile variable WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT whereas
/usr/src/Makefile.inc1 wants -DNO_DYNAMICROOT.
It should be corrected in the ReleaseNotes (IMHO)
mit freundliche
Matthew Dillon writes:
> Hmm. Well, I think there's some confusion here. While I
> certainly like my vision for DFly better then I like the vision
> for FreeBSD-5, that is simply in the eye of the beholder... of
> course I am going to like my own vision better. It's my vision,
>
> That's a more interesting result and more comparable to Drew's test.
> It doesn't necessarily invalidate Drew's results - /bin/sh has 3
> shared libraries and is locale-aware whereas /usr/bin/test has 1
> shared library and doesn't rely on the locale. /usr/bin/true is also
> significantly smalle
I have been experiencing some random lockups after upgrading from
5.1-RELEASE to 5.2-BETA.
I then wen on and enabled all the debug options in my kernel config
hoping to be able to find the cause.
But now I cannot boot at all. In the end of the boot process when
detecting ATA drives, I get this:
i see that there some doubt about whether running lots of
shell scripts ever happens. what happens when you
use make? lots of shells get run and they run small
(one line?) scripts.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "boyd, rounin" write
s:
>From: "Stefan Farfeleder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > errno is meaningful for syscalls after an error (the original
>> > message). The fact that other functions also dink with errno is not
>> > relevant to that statement.
>>
>> I read boyd's s
From: "Stefan Farfeleder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > errno is meaningful for syscalls after an error (the original
> > message). The fact that other functions also dink with errno is not
> > relevant to that statement.
>
> I read boyd's statement as a contradiction to Jacques' one (only after
> sysc
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 03:07, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 25 Nov, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 November 2003 11:52, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > > I'd greatly prefer that the the dynamic root default be backed out
> > > >
> >> > > until a substantial amount of this performance can be recove
:...
:5.x and propaganda about DFBSD doesn't really mean a whole lot, unless you
:are looking for new recruits to your camp. In any case, you've made your
:point on a nearly daily basis that 5.x is inferior to what DFBSD will be,
:and that you don't have much knowledge or care about 5.x anyways.
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
