On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:48:57PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>... I think [/rescue] only needs to support those > >>recovery actions necessary to repair /bin and /sbin if they break. > > > >My stance is that no failure mode needs to > >be repairable that wasn't repairable with a static /. > > I'm willing to compromise, David. > > Here's what I suggest: > > * I could support removing vi/ex from /rescue.
Either way -- keep it or not. But lets agree that the FTP client will be the last thing added to /rescue that is outside the original charter. > * In exchange for this concession, would you be willing > to support adding fetch? If we're going to add an FTP client, lets pick the one with the best functionality for the job -- /usr/bin/ftp. I may not know the complete URL to the bits I need, and if so with fetch you're still screwed. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
