>
> On 13-Dec-2001 Mike Heffner wrote:
> | mikeh 2001/12/13 15:46:45 PST
...
> | Log:
> | Connect lukemftp to the build as the default ftp client. Lukemftp
> | supports most of the previous features of FreeBSD ftp, but has been
> | better maintained and includes new features.
>
> S
Two solid problems occur with the sound/pci/ich
driver for the ICH2 (Intel 82801BA I/O Controller
Hub) on Dell Optiplex 150 PCs. One problem
(a fatal hang) occurs under 4.4-RELEASE,
4.4-STABLE, and 5.0-CURRENT (as of yesterday).
I have a temporary fix for the fatal hang,
but don't claim to unde
On 14-Dec-2001 Mike Heffner wrote:
|
| Differences/Losses:
|
| *) FTP_PASSIVE_MODE vs. FTP_MODE
s/FTP_MODE/FTPMODE
As a followup clarification, ftp(1) will attempt to use passive mode by
default, and fall back to active mode. To achieve the old default behavior
(active mode) set FTPMODE=acti
By my reading of the code I would like to make the following changes
to the documentation for the zone(9) man page;
Index: zone.9
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/share/man/man9/zone.9,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 zone.9
---
On 14-Dec-01 David Xu wrote:
> I persist with adding "cc", because it does not hurt anything.
It doesn't do anything either except add repo bloat and obfuscate the code a
bit more.
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" -
I persist with adding "cc", because it does not hurt anything.
--
David Xu
John Baldwin wrote:
>On 13-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
>
>>>--- i386/i386/identcpu.c 30 Nov 2001 11:57:23 - 1.96
>>>+++ i386/i386/identcpu.c 6 Dec 2001 07:58:25 -
>>>@@ -115,10 +115,11 @@
>>> static vo
On 13-Dec-2001 Mike Heffner wrote:
| mikeh 2001/12/13 15:46:45 PST
|
| Modified files:
| usr.bin/ftp Makefile
| Removed files:
| usr.bin/ftp cmds.c cmdtab.c complete.c domacro.c
| extern.h fetch.c ftp.1 ftp.c ftp_var.h
|
On 14-Dec-01 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> With a freshly cvsupped version of CURRENT, cross-compiled on a
> 4.3 box, (after the usual stdio.h fix related to the FILE handling),
> I am having problems compiling several programs, with errors such
> as the ones attached at the end.
Just use WARNS=0 or some
With a freshly cvsupped version of CURRENT, cross-compiled on a
4.3 box, (after the usual stdio.h fix related to the FILE handling),
I am having problems compiling several programs, with errors such
as the ones attached at the end.
In most cases they choke on missing prototype for main().
This d
On 13-Dec-01 John Baldwin wrote:
>>> static void
>>> do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p)
>>> {
>>> +
>>> +p[0] = ax;
>>> __asm __volatile(
>>> "cpuid"
>>> -: "=a" (p[0]), "=b" (p[1]), "=c" (p[2]), "=d" (p[3])
>>> -: "0" (ax)
>>> +: "+a" (p[0]), "=b" (p[1]), "=c" (p[2]), "=d
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 05-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
>> >> - Add missing "cc" clobbers in constraints
>> >
>> > Does this have any effect (for i386's) except to create a lot of clutter
>> > Even i386.md doesn't u
On 13-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
>> --- i386/i386/identcpu.c 30 Nov 2001 11:57:23 - 1.96
>> +++ i386/i386/identcpu.c 6 Dec 2001 07:58:25 -
>> @@ -115,10 +115,11 @@
>> static void
>> do_cpuid(u_int ax, u_int *p)
>> {
>> +
>> +p[0] = ax;
>> __asm __volatile(
>>
If memory serves me right, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I've noticed that -current has much lower TCP performance. I haven't
> had time to investigate it but I presume there is some overhead
> somewhere that is killing it.
Here's a data point but I'm not sure how useful it is. At the sta
I've noticed that -current has much lower TCP performance. I haven't
had time to investigate it but I presume there is some overhead
somewhere that is killing it.
-Matt
:Hi,
:I am testing the forwarding performance of CURRENT vs. STABLE
:(both
Thanks, David. I'm going to have to go through the whole troubleshooting
process. Both the server and the client, my laptop, are running current and
to make it worse I did a portupgrade -Rria on both since I used dhcp the
last time. At least I know that it should work:-)
Thanks, again.
ed
Q
Emiel,
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I have to look further.
Hmmm... Maybe it is my dhcp server but the problem originated with the
excite@home service change to attbi.com and their dhcp. Neither work:-(
ed
Quoting Emiel Kollof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Edwin Culp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 01:57:46PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > STABLE can forward approx 125Kpps, whereas CURRENT tops at approx 80Kpps.
>
> Kernel configs, please.
Attached. PICO5 is for CURRENT, PICO4 is for STABLE.
In my testbed i am using t
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:17:45 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Since last week, I'm having trouble compiling one of the utilities
> supplied with Exim, which calls uname():
>
> gcc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro \
> -o exim_lock exim_lock.c -lcrypt -lpam
> /tmp/cc2YeHtC.o: In fu
>Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:15:32 -0800
>From: Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Is anyone using dhclient successfully with Current of the last week or so?
Sure; hadn't noticed any problems with it.
>I don't use it all the time but I have been trying for the last couple of
>days without success.
* Edwin Culp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is anyone using dhclient successfully with Current of the last week or so?
> I don't use it all the time but I have been trying for the last couple of
> days without success.
>
> It accesses the server and changes the interface ip to 0.0.0.0 netmask
> 2
Is anyone using dhclient successfully with Current of the last week or so?
I don't use it all the time but I have been trying for the last couple of
days without success.
It accesses the server and changes the interface ip to 0.0.0.0 netmask
255.255.255.255.
Thanks,
ce
---
To Unsubscribe:
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> STABLE can forward approx 125Kpps, whereas CURRENT tops at approx 80Kpps.
Kernel configs, please.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messag
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> Ok, I've axed all the "cc" clobbers from the patch now. Any objections to it
> now? It's still at ~jhb/patches/i386_asm.patch.
Review of what I can see: the URL still appears to be well formed ;-). But
it didn't seem to work, so I scp'ed the file.
>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 07:27:09PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> suggests, that this is a fixable bug, but every time I mention it, I
> get shouted down. And yes, like Jörg, I don't care enough. I'm not
> saying "ditch the Microsoft partition table", I'm saying "don't ditch
> disks without the Mic
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
JB>
JB>On 12-Dec-01 Harti Brandt wrote:
JB>> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
JB>>
JB>> PK>
JB>> PK>My buildworld breaks:
JB>> PK>
JB>> PK>[...]
JB>> PK>/flat/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/i386/kvm-fbsd.c:52:
JB>> machine/globaldata.h: No
JB>>
25 matches
Mail list logo
