Both are the most used pascal
compiler nowadays. ;)
But, I never encounter code that uses this feature; it is the perfect
example of how adding syntactic sugar can help the needs of just one man.
You never encounter it doesn't mean it never been used or it's only used
by one m
And yes, I'd like to have implemented that ("child units") in FPC.
What is child unit?
But even so, it still wouldn't help Bee, because he's not using it for
namespaces, he's using it as special names for version control. This
was the part I was attacking, i
#x27;s like the '='. It does not always mean 'equal' as you have to use it
on type declaration *and* comparison. It's like the 'end'. It does not
always need to have 'begin' since 'case' and 'try' can also have
Use an underscore.
Ok, I need to learn a new habit then. I can live with that. Thanks,
Michael. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org
ing it was designed for.
For some reasons, sometimes version control is too bloated, especially
when the project is not too big. Nevertheless, it's the easiest way to
have "manual" version control. :D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
__
Hi all,
Why cant FPC use unit that has (some) dot(s) within the file name? Can
FPC support it in the next release (2.2.2)?
Sometimes I need to have some units for example: unit1.ori.pas and
unit1.modif.pas, which I need to switch to one of them but never use
them both.
TIA.
-Bee-
has
e if it is done.
This is just too much effort for pure syntactic sugar.
Sugar is sweet. Lots of people like sweet things. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasca
en why not implement some of them in FPC too?
Like FPC supports the ugly '+=' C syntax. :-P Maybe it's a good feature
for some 'lazy' programmers, but I personally don't like it. However,
I'm not against it, because FPC doesn't force me to use that syntax.
ame. You can't use "a.c" and hope it will refers to "b". Use it
all or use none. CMIIW. I didn't touch my Delphi in the last 6 months, I
can be wrong or forget the detail of this feature. Somebody please
confirm this.
And what is the use in your
unit name = file name
That's it. It's enough for me. Let the dot as part of the file name.
That's all. :-D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
re. Fine.
Also important is debatable because we've already lived without them for years.
Ah, you should throw away your car, your cellphone, or even your laptop.
Those are not important, because humans had already lived happily
without them for ages! :-P
-Bee-
has Be
using
Delphi 7 and works well. Now, I'm trying to port it to FPC.
Hints? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
You have
plftOraClob, plftOraClob
2 times the same element. This is not allowed.
Arrggg... what a stupid mistake! How can I didn't notice that?! It
should be plftOraClob, plftOraBlob (clob and blob)! Thank you, Michael!
Thank you again for the ultra fast response! :-D
-Bee-
Arrggg... what a stupid mistake! How can I didn't notice that?! It
should be plftOraClob, plftOraBlob (clob and blob)! Thank you, Michael!
Thank you again for the ultra fast response! :-D
FYI, the fatal internal error still persist. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
x27;t have the mistake. How did I do that? I feel so
silly. :-D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
sure
it's not my fault in the first place. :-D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
With wonder, I commented line 56. Then the compiler complained with this
message:
test_intf_query.pas(66,14) Fatal: Internal error 200408162
So, may I made a conclusion that this is a bug?
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
So, may I made a conclusion that this is a bug?
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=10684
Is there any feasible workaround for this before the bug is fixed? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist
Hi Bee, perhaps you could try using {$MODE Delphi} instead of {$MODE
OBJFPC} since you seem to want Delphi compatibility.
Problem still persists. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
Did you try such a brute force approach?
Yup, but with no luck. It's very reproducable, see my report at mantis.
I almost sure that it's about interface things since that it starts the
problem since the beginning. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wor
2.0. On CentOS4.
Mantis seemed to be down, so I report this to this list first, just for
a notice.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I suppose you meant 2.2.1? Or did 2.2.0 has this problem?
Both of them. :-D
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
var
MyObject: TAncestor;
This is the problem.
it compiles correctly in Delphi (5 and 7)
Are you sure? It fails on my Delphi 7.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
. I wonder because IMO it's some kind of basic
operation for interface. Or aren't there much pascal developers that
using this technique? Any other better technique for this? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
Using fcl-db aka sqldb, how to call oracle's stored procedure through
toracleconnection? So far, google can't help me much. :( Or is there a
special component to handle stored procedure as in Delphi? TIA.
I'm using Oracle 10g, FPC 2.2.1, on Ubuntu 386.
-Bee-
has Bee.o
Hi all,
Using fcl-db aka sqldb, how to call oracle's stored procedure through
toracleconnection? So far, google can't help me much. :( Or is there a
special component to handle stored procedure as in Delphi? TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wor
aram2'')';
query.ExecSql;
That's what common db engines do. But not with oracle. Yes, I tested
them. :( For SP with no return value(s), simply do "call
sp_name" is working perfectly. But if the SP involves
out param and/or cursor, none of "common&quo
. But, I don't understand why PHP requires two calls for
OCIExecute to get an SP result.
Can you submit a bug-report?
I want to make sure my attempts are on the right track before I submit a
bug report. So, Joost... please help me here. If I found it's not too
For SF, Oracle returns the output as row. To call SF, I'm using "call
sf_name from dual". But, I found the output of SF is not "compatible"
with TDataSource, and it raises an AV too.
Sorry, my mistake. I mean "select sf_name from dual"
ss. I found they will release a new
major version in the next few months.
If one doesn't like Morfik, he can pick Powtils. It's a web application
framework for pascal. It's not another scripting engine, it's CGI based.
It's easy to use, yet powerful.
-
, fpweb)
- db component (fcl-db)
- pascal cross platform programming
- morfik
- etc.
So, who's gonna start? ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Hey, his site is writen in PHP. :(
That makes pascal (fpc's) web framework should be the first article from
us. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
That sqldb doesn't return data from a stored procedure is probably
because it only tries to fetch data if the query starts with 'select' or
'show'. I'll have to add 'call' to that list for Oracle and do some
tests.
Where can I add 'call'
override TSQLConnection.StrToStatementType in TOracleCOnnection, and add it
there.
If I simply replace 'execute' with 'call' of StatementTokens constant
within sqldb unit, then recompile FPC and Lazarus, would it work?
It's just for testing to make sure it works be
No, because you would break other connection types.
As I said, it's just for testing purpose and I don't use other
connection type. But as far as I understand, it indeed doesn't work
since stExecProcedure is never checked anyway. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeograph
e number means: "ORA-24333: zero iteration count error". It's the same
exact error message when I tried Zeos to access the same SP. I don't
know what it means. I'm stucked, again. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
__
override TSQLConnection.StrToStatementType in TOracleCOnnection, and add it
there.
BTW... 'select sf from dual' despite the syntax very common is still not
working, raising an unhandled AV. I think it's more than just syntax or
parsing problem. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.o
requires a table. Does an SF belong to a table?
Ah, I need to dig more to Oracle manuals, obviously. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ng Lazarus?
If it's indeed run on Linux, I'll consider to purchase. Thanks, Michael. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
sqlDB supports Oracle's default
SP/SF and get the best performance out of it. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
So, the thing we should fix is to make sqlDB supports Oracle's default
SP/SF and get the best performance out of it. ;)
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=11117
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal mai
You should rewrite the whole unit in a cross-platform manner.
Is it possible? I read somewhere that the behavior API of Windows is
pretty much different to API of Linux (and other uni*x platform). Maybe
I'll end up writing a specific unit for each platform. :(
-Bee-
has Bee.ograp
guide about similar linux API of the windows counterpart, including the
description, the parameter lists, the API behavior differences, and
which FPC unit should be used (instead of just windows unit).
Or maybe I should just rewrite the whole unit from scratch on linux? :-D
TIA.
-Bee-
has Bee.og
it's implemented in various ways (UDF, SP, SF, etc).
But I also agree that we shouldn't use this mechanism at all time. Each
decision and choice has its own consequences. ;)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-
I do think that every method, technique must remain a mean, not a goal.
+1 :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc
) e.g. fcl-web, sql-db,
etc. applicable on Mac/OSX/Cocoa 64-bit platform?
Any hints for those questions are very much appreciated. Thank you.
Regards,
--
-Bee-
"I'm an old pascal lover who feels left alone on Apple platform because
FreePascal/Lazarus are no longer Apple friendly like
Minggu, 02 November 2014, Jonas Maebe menulis:
On 02/11/14 15:43, Bee wrote:
> > "I'm an old pascal lover who feels left alone on Apple platform because
> > FreePascal/Lazarus are no longer Apple friendly like they used to be."
>
> How was FPC more "Appl
ight? CMIIW.
Another example, take a look at Oxygene --another pascal language variant
by RemObjects-- is able to target OSX, iOS, .Net, Mono, and Android
natively without ruining their pascal syntax. Why can't FPC be like that? I
don't understand because I'm not a compiler guy. :)
A
ne (another pascal variant) as it behaves almost like the way I want.
I could use the same consistent syntax on any platforms. Although I have to
know special cases where API on particular OS is very much different from
other OSes. But it's pretty ra
n testing
phase right now before jump into Apple platform next year. Wish me luck! :)
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi,
Is there anyone out there making node.js-like system using FreePascal?
Thank you.
Regards,
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
out page:
http://nodejs.org/about/ e.g. asynchronous event driven, non-blocking call,
etc. I take it as similar to TCustomApplication but for server side app
(using Javascript). CMIIW.
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freep
Which one is the correct structure? If I want to list the sections of a
message file, which mark should I follow? Or is that a bug? Should I report
it to bugtracker? Or did I understand it wrong?
Oh, I'm using FPC 2.6.4 on OS X Yosemite.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
-Bee-
__
I found 7 sections.
3. The '# is the last used one' string. With this, I found 12 sections.
But the sum of messages of the section found using these patterns isn't
equal to the real number of messages. There are 901 messages, but th
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Bee wrote:
>
> Do you mean including the content?
>
Sorry... I mean, the structure and numbering is also created manually?
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Bee wrote:
>
> 1. The '\section' - '\end' pair. With this, I found 12 sections.
>
Sorry again... I mean, 10 sections. Lots of typo. I think I need some rest.
:)
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-p
this.)
If I want to translate the above lines into another language, do I need to
translate the content of the \section line (between the {} bracket)? If I
do, how about some sections that don't have the \section line? There's no
description for s
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> The errore.msg is completely created by hand (it's the master file) while
> the others are copies of that from various ages with additions of new
> messages.
>
Ah, I see. Perhaps that's the cause for the incon
l somewhere in the
documentation. Am I wrong?
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ep a message per section at a
time, instead of staring at a wall of text at once. By grouping messages
into sections is also easier to build a progress matrix and statistic.
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepas
lation tool for those message files,
as a web app, so everyone can contribute and work together. It's just for a
personal project in my spare time. :)
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
at least to
me. When I searched the wiki, I only see the roadmap for Lazarus. CMIIW.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
I see. So FPC development has no planned innovation and no vision what it
will become. It just takes whatever available. Alright. Thank you. :)
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 11.01.2015 04:05 schrieb "Bee" :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thi
Hi,
Just got an article about new language features from RO's Oxygene language.
I think some of them might be good to be (considered and) implemented in
FPC v.3.
http://blogs.remobjects.com/blogs/mh/2015/01/28/p7049
What do you think? :)
Regards,
--
Hi,
This is an interesting article about interface and multiple inheritance in
Java.
http://blog.cleancoder.com/uncle-bob/2015/01/08/InterfaceConsideredHarmful.html
I wonder, how modern Pascal (FreePascal in particular) answer the
questions. :)
Regards,
--
-Bee
d
make[1]: *** [compiler_cycle] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/fpc/trunk'
Makefile:2837: recipe for target 'build-stamp.arm-linux' failed
make: *** [build-stamp.arm-linux] Error 2
According to this article:
http://otapi.com/2015/02/10/raspb
2015 at 9:08 PM, John Lee wrote:
> Confused re what bee is using. Line 1 of the email says rpi 1 whereas
> later he refers to rpi 2 article..
>
> Which 'v2.6.4 linuxarm' package is referred to in the email, from which
> repo? That from svn apt-get install fpc or another? How
Mar 4, 2015 at 8:14 PM, John Lee wrote:
>
> Let's hope that we can get fpc 2.6.4 and 3.1.1 working on rpi 1 and rpi 2.
> john
>
>
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Hi,
Take a look at this interesting product: http://p2js.gelicon.biz/en
It's build upon FPC source and has GPL license. It looks interesting.
Perhaps we can use this to boost FPC's pas2js tool?
Regards,
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal mailli
mpile it on Ubuntu Linux using FPC 2.6.4 Is there a way to compile it
on Linux, Michael? Can you do that?
Thank you.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Bee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> Take a look at this interesting product:
most impossible to compile p2js on linux or osx.
p2js was written to only target Windows, although it's using FPC. This is
very unfortunate. :(
--
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
.2.2.4 and Lazarus 9.29. This is my first experience
accessing Oracle from Mac OS. I never had this kind of problem while
on Linux (Ubuntu and CentOS).
Any hints? TIA.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
us in this case) also can be used to
build a web application. If we're so proud that our compiler can
compile itself, why don't we create our own forum? ;)
This might be the right moment.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing
consideration when one choosing a framework and/or the language. ;)
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
user, and now an ExtPascal user. But if
there's someone willing to start a new project for pascal forum then
I'd like to join. :)
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wor
the best tool because it's provided by FPC and Lazarus (lazWeb), so we
would have many people to be asked for if we're in trouble. :D
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
fpWeb
as it's provided out-of-the-box by FPC/Lazarus so anybody interested
with the source code, one doesn't need to bother download from third-
party component provider.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeograph
ed to promote pascal for web
application development.
Building a proper forum is not something you do in a few days.
Yes, and it would take forever if no one dare to start it. ;)
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpres
So Bee, register a project on SourceForge or GitHub and start
coding. Maybe
somebody will contribute at some stage. Like they said in some old
movie:
"Build it and they will come".
If I made one, then I'll make it using Powtils (fully CGI) or
ExtPascal (fully Ajax) becaus
only support java application such as Blackberry. Well, I almost know
nothing about compiler development, so I just hope it'd be possible
someday through the help of Midlet Pascal code.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wor
build a web forum using
fpWeb, instead of Powtils or ExtPascal.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Well, fpWeb is winner, yes?
Bee can create a sourceforge project?
If it would use fpWeb then I refuse to be the project owner because I
almost know nothing about fpWeb. I even intend to study fpWeb from
this project. The project owner should be someone who knows how to
build (at least
's Closure for that purpose.
Are they possible to be done with fpWeb? How much effort will be
required to achieve it? Where should we start to work on it?
TIA.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeograph
to implement it
in Pascal as well.
Can someone tell me how to implement "fake" mixin feature in pascal?
Or better, is it possible if FPC provides such language feature? I
think it's good language feature (compare to sealed class, for
example) and can be quite useful in some
oesn't yet support either feature. :(
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
think I must stay with the first plan, simply ignore mixin and prevent
custom widget creation. Until FPC support mixin or similar
functionality.
Thanks.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
...writing stories at http://beeography.wor
or medium to large apps, with hundreds of concurrent
requests, it simply shines over plain CGI.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
the FCGI app is
about to terminate itself at the end of its session. You can imagine how big
performance boost you will get. ;)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 25 Mei 2010, at 02:15, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> Why do you need verification? That information is readily available on
>> ExtPascal's wiki.
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/extpascal/wiki/Gett
On 25 Mei 2010, at 11:29, Bee Jay wrote:
>
> On 25 Mei 2010, at 02:15, Marcos Douglas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>>>
>>> Why do you need verification? That information is readily available on
>>> ExtPascal
On 25 Mei 2010, at 11:32, Bee Jay wrote:
> Oh, did I mention live debugging? ;)
Oh, did I mention that FCGI is an open standardized protocol that is supported
by virtually any web servers? That means you could avoid vendor technology
locked-in, such as Apache mod or IIS ISAPI. ;)
-
you never listen to me. ;) :D
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ascal, you should be able to use the
FCGI part only without need to bother with the ExtJS part. However, the
refactoring result isn't yet fully tested and it might leave some coupled code
behind.
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@
is being used together by some apps, the memory
will not be released until ALL the apps that using it got terminated. If the
shared memory also being used by the OS kernel, then it will never be released
by the OS, unless you restart the whole system. It is a very serious issue.
HTH.
-Bee-
___
tter for the community, I suppose. ;)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
review to Wanderlan if I can prove it.
> I still follow its progress, but see no signs that the design flaws will be
> fixed, even with the recent refactorings :/
Wanderlan is an open minded person. If you could prove the arguments, he will
> altogether and use TComponent decsendents instead.
Because the high demand of it, some of us could convince Wanderlan that it
would make ExtPascal better in the long run. Wanderlan is considering to do
exactly that. See... ;)
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal
el, because it is simply not correct in many circumstances. It is visible
> in the use of threadvars.
Any suggestion how to do it better?
-Bee-
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 25 Mei 2010, at 23:37, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> My only doubt is: why to use CGI proxy, not a FCGI?
The main purpose of CGI proxy existence is to provide solution for some
environments where FCGI setup isn't possible. The other advantages are bonuses.
On 26 Mei 2010, at 24:12, Marcos Douglas wrote:
> If the environment allows use FCGI, you would not CGI gateway?
No, because I WANT to use those bonuses. However, by able to use the bonuses,
you can't negate the main purpose of its existenc
101 - 200 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
