I see. So FPC development has no planned innovation and no vision what it will become. It just takes whatever available. Alright. Thank you. :)
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 11.01.2015 04:05 schrieb "Bee" <bee.ogra...@gmail.com>: > > > > Hi, > > > > This morning I saw FPC's SVN was already marked for v.3.0. There must be > some reasons why it's not marked for v.2.8 (as successor for currently > v.2.6). May I ask... what are the targets and roadmap for FPC v.3.0? > > > > When I looked at the bugtracker, I can't see anything useful, at least > to me. When I searched the wiki, I only see the roadmap for Lazarus. CMIIW. > > We don't have "targets" or a "roadmap" for FPC as we simply take what's > there and prepare it for release. > It was decided that the changes the compiler experienced since 2.6 are big > enough to increase the major version from 2 to 3. Btw: the successor of 2.8 > would not necessarily be 3.0, but can also be 2.10. (the FPC_FULLVERSION > define would support this as it uses leading zeros for values < 10). > > Regards, > Sven > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > -- -Bee-
_______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
