Hi,
currently I'm searching for a library for use with fpc to handle
arbitrary files. My goal is to check if file extension corresponds with
content (e.g. a .gif named .png) and to extract metadata like author,
topic, creation date and the like.
What I have found is:
- Apache Tika - https://tika
On Sunday 21 December 2014 07:26:42 you wrote:
> > I downloaded the sources, but can not find the crt sources.
> >
> >fpsrc/rtl/linux ?
>
> latest stable:
> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_2_6_4/rtl/unix/crt.pp
> trunk:
> http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/trunk/packages/rtl-console
Hello,
Recently I've made a class to generate error log for codes in Delphi and
Free Pascal. It works capturing the class name where the problem occurred,
adding the date/time concatenated with the error message. It's working
perfectly in Delphi.
The problem is in Free Pascal and in your approach
Am 23.12.2014 15:53 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> It is very weird this generated class names. The Free Pascal will
continue to use these weird names or there are plans to improve this in
future versions? With names like that is almost impossible to create
automated error logs structures with Free Pasca
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sven Barth
wrote:
> Am 23.12.2014 15:53 schrieb "silvioprog" :
> > It is very weird this generated class names. The Free Pascal will
> continue to use these weird names or there are plans to improve this in
> future versions? With names like that is almost impossi
And:
C:\repository\git\freepascal\bin\i386-win32>fpc -iDV
2014/12/23 2.7.1
...
begin
WriteLn({$I %FPCDATE%});
end.
Out: 2014/12/23
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 2:10 PM, silvioprog wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Sven Barth
> wrote:
>
>> Am 23.12.2014 15:53 schrieb "silvioprog" :
>> >
At http://www.fourmilab.ch/fbench/fbench.html John Walker, formerly of
Autodesk, rates FPC as one of the faster languages but remarks "To the
best of my knowledge, none of the language implementations tested
exploit the thread-level parallelism implemented in modern processors."
Allowing that
> Allowing that he used FPC 2.2.0, is optimisation etc. likely to have
improved enough that somebody could usefully suggest he rerun the test?
Upgrading his tools would be better, they're waaay to old. However, for
FPC, I'd like to see when the next stable release comes out. There are new
op
