On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 4 April 2010 18:21, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The disadvantage being that they are not updated when the documentation
is updated.
Luckily (no offence meant) the documentation doesn't change that much
or that quickly. I'll probably keep to t
On 05/04/2010, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> Yes, it's still on my todo list.
>
> One day, you should publish this list.
:-) By the sounds of things, I don't think your list is going to be
much smaller than mine. ;-)
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpG
On 05/04/2010, cobines wrote:
> >>
> > I'm not sure that is correct. Once you free Test, Pest still points to
> > the same non existing object and you can use assigned to check it,
>
>
> Pest would be a dangling pointer and should not be accessed.
Correct, and that was what I was trying to get
consider the following generic class declaration:
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
type
generic TMedian = class
class function Find(x: array of T): T;
end;
class function TMedian.Find(x: array of T): T;
var
i, j, Middle: Integer;
Temporary: T;
begin
// Use truncated selection sort to find medi
If it is only between int and double, maybe this will help
have on overload function
class function TMedian.Div(Value, Divider: Integer): Integer; // Result
:= Value div Divider
class function TMedian.Div(Value, Divider: Double): Double; // Result
:= Value / Divider
then the compiler choose
Hi all,
When trying to debug a series of events in a program, parts of source
lines disappear - apart from the fact that the execution secuence seems
very off.
This extract from the source file:
if ch = eofchar then
sy := sps[ch]
else begin
error(erchar);
next
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 00:07:07 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Luckily (no offence meant) the documentation doesn't change that much
> or that quickly. I'll probably keep to the same release cycle as FPC -
> whenever a new FPC is released, release new FPC INF docs too.
Hi Graeme,
Sorry for my ign
On 05 Apr 2010, at 16:17, John Coppens wrote:
> I haven't seen this kind of problem before, not in Pascal nor in C.
> Why is the '... to 1' appearing in the listing?
This usually means that you modified the file since it was loaded in the
debugger.
Jonas___
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:21:33 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> > I haven't seen this kind of problem before, not in Pascal nor in C.
> > Why is the '... to 1' appearing in the listing?
>
> This usually means that you modified the file since it was loaded in
> the debugger.
That was it - but it seems sl
On 05 Apr 2010, at 16:27, John Coppens wrote:
> Doesn't gdb detect source code changes? It's been a while, but I seem to
> remember gdb warning about the C source file having been changed.
GDB warns if *on startup* the time stamp of a source file is newer than that of
the binary. If you change
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:21:33 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> This usually means that you modified the file since it was loaded in
> the debugger.
And it still gives some strange result:
if ch = eofchar then
sy := sps[ch]
else begin
error(erchar);
nextch;
g
On 05 Apr 2010, at 16:36, John Coppens wrote:
> gives:
>
> 654 if ch = eofchar then
> (gdb) n
> 655 sy := sps[ch]
> (gdb)
> 659 goto 1;
> (gdb)
> 661 symbol_read := true;
>
> Does this have anything to do with optimizations?
Unlikely. You can always disable
On 5 April 2010 16:19, John Coppens wrote:
>
> Sorry for my ignorance - what are INF files? Google seems confused too.
INF files are compiled (binary) IPF [Information Presentation
Facility] help files. It is the help file and digital document format
originally created by IBM for the OS/2 operati
Hello,
This looks promising.
Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
Several people have asked about MPI in Free Pascal. Maybe
this is an answer for them.
Michael.
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Werner Van Belle wrote:
Hello,
After the couple of questions I had about reference co
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Hello,
> This looks promising.
>
> Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
That would require me to read up on what MPI is and honoustly, I'm not a
big fan on doing that, certainly not after I went to their homepage and
saw around 70 lines of contrib
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Werner Van Belle wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Hello,
This looks promising.
Can you explain the similarities and differences with MPI ?
That would require me to read up on what MPI is and honoustly, I'm not a
big fan on doing that, certainly not after I went to their
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> MPI is for passing messages between parallel running tasks. (the name
> means Message Passing Interface)
> This is what Active Objects does.
>
> To me, the difference seems that Active Objects runs within a single
> process, and MPI allows to run the tasks in different
Hello all,
After installing fpc 2.4.0 on a freedos directory, I had the following
problems:
- I tried to install using the install program, but dosemu crashed when
clicking on 'Continue'
- So I installed the base package manually, adjusted the path. Now fpc
(without arguments) starts correctly,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:04:55 +0200
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> Unlikely. You can always disable the explicitly with -O-. Without a
> compilable example program that demonstrates the problem I cannot help
> further.
Ok... Thanks! Will try to extract the important part.
John
_
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 17:25:44 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Wikipedia has some information on IPF.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Presentation_Facility
Thanks for the extensive answer, Graeme!
I'm sure the selection of IPF/INF caused some discussion at the time,
particularly at a
On 05 Apr 2010, at 21:21, John Coppens wrote:
> Anyone had a similar experience?
As the DosEMU output says: "ERROR: Please report the contents of
~/.dosemu/boot.log at
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=457447&group_id=49784&func=browse";
This is a bug in DosEMU.
> (NOTE: I tried dosbox too
In our previous episode, John Coppens said:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> > Wikipedia has some information on IPF.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Presentation_Facility
>
> Thanks for the extensive answer, Graeme!
>
> I'm sure the selection of IPF/INF caused some discussion at t
On Mon, April 5, 2010 21:38, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 05 Apr 2010, at 21:21, John Coppens wrote:
>
>> Anyone had a similar experience?
>
> As the DosEMU output says: "ERROR: Please report the contents of
> ~/.dosemu/boot.log at
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=457447&group_id=49784&func=browse
guys i've been working on a port of an application that uses the Com IPersist
Interface , one of its procedures seems to be wrong ,
Function GetClassId(clsid:TClsId):HResult; StdCall;
yet i believe it should be
Function GetClassId(out clsid:TClsId):HResult; StdCall
i've checked the MSDN and
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Justin Smyth
wrote:
> guys i've been working on a port of an application that uses the Com
> IPersist Interface , one of its procedures seems to be wrong ,
>
>
> Function GetClassId(clsid:TClsId):HResult; StdCall;
>
> yet i believe it should be
>
> Function GetClass
That's fine, thanks. It's between integers and floating points actually, so
declaring the floating point one with Extended is better, I guess.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-creating-generic-class%3A-division-problem-tp28140305p28147009.html
Sent from the Free Pascal
On 5 April 2010 21:26, John Coppens wrote:
>
> I'm sure the selection of IPF/INF caused some discussion at the time,
> particularly at a time where xml is the magic recipe for everything ;-)
As Marco said, the class documentation is in XML and gets transformed
to other "final" formats via the 'fpd
27 matches
Mail list logo
