On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
> Dear all users,
>
>I'm looking for an unity for calculus of some more complex
> functions in Pascal than those avaiable in the Delphi math.pas unity.
> For a more specific case I would like to calculate FFT and IFFT of
> some signal data. Does t
Lee Jenkins schreef:
Hey, all is there a snapshot available for 2.3.1? I tried downloading
the fpbuild kit and go woefully lost :)
ftp://ftp.hu.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v23/i386-win32/fpc-2.3.1.i386-win32.zip
I'd like to upgrade, but not sure how get a good binary installation on
After 9 months of active development and bug fixes, the Free Pascal core
team is proud to announce the availability of the first release
candidate of the expected 2.2.2 compiler.
Users who want to test this release candidate are encouraged to report
bugs and regressions they encounter as soon as
On 18 Jun 2008, at 07:50, Alexander Bauer wrote:
i have a problem when i use cwstrings together with threads on linux.
I made a simple program which create threads in an endless loop.
Every thread only does a sleep(1) and then finish.
Without 'cwstrings' everything works fine.
But when i incl
On 13 Jun 2008, at 09:41, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
#1
FBLib uses the standard LGPL. We link that software directly into our
executables. We don't use it as an external (dynamically linked)
.so/.dll library. FBLib is pretty much a wrapper for the Firebird
libfbclient.so library. If this poses
> > I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if
> > we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license
> > it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our
> > executable. Does this pose any issues for us?
>
> MPL is not (modified) LGPL c
On 18 Jun 2008, at 10:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if
we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license
it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our
executable. Does this pose any issues f
But is it free avaiable? Or only in the book??
2008/6/18, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
>
> > Dear all users,
> >
> >I'm looking for an unity for calculus of some more complex
> > functions in Pascal than those avaiable in the Delp
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
> But is it free avaiable? Or only in the book??
I have the sources.
If you have a license for the C version, then I can try to send them to you.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freep
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I would like to create a shot overview of the code quality of
FPC. Please help to complete the list:
Under i386 code size and speed is similar to Delphi and gcc (except
for some synthetic benchmarks).
Under x86_64 pentium code size and speed is similar to gcc (exc...).
Mazen NEIFER schreef:
After 9 months of active development and bug fixes, the Free Pascal core
team is proud to announce the availability of the first release
candidate of the expected 2.2.2 compiler.
Users who want to test this release candidate are encouraged to report
bugs and regressions th
Unfortunately I don't have the license for C version or anyone.
Is there any other source?? I would like to create or have a Math.pas
unity complete for scientific reasons...
2008/6/18, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
>
> > But is it fr
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't have the license for C version or anyone.
>
> Is there any other source?? I would like to create or have a Math.pas
> unity complete for scientific reasons...
Maybe Jedi-math has what you need ?
Michael.
>
>
>
> 2008/6/18
2008/6/18 Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If it's plain LGPL and you link it statically, then you have to supply all
> object files of the rest of your program to your customers (when they ask
> for it; and you have to inform them of this right they have, by including a
> copy of the LGPL with
On 18 Jun 2008, at 14:59, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Below I quoted the Modified LGPL...
"As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give
you permission to link this library with independent modules to
produce an executable, regardless of the license terms of these
independent
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Lourival Mendes wrote:
> >
> > Is there any other source?? I would like to create or have a Math.pas
> > unity complete for scientific reasons...
>
> Maybe Jedi-math has what you need ?
And there is also numlib, though docs are lacking.
2008/6/18 Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It means that you are free to relicense a file back to the regular LGPL if
> it was originally distributed under our modified LGPL.
Only back to the regular LGPL, or to any other license of choice?
I presume only to the regular LGPL, otherwise it wil
On 18 Jun 2008, at 15:36, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
2008/6/18 Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It means that you are free to relicense a file back to the regular
LGPL if
it was originally distributed under our modified LGPL.
Only back to the regular LGPL, or to any other license of choice
2008/6/18 Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It simply says that you can again remove the static linking exception that
> we added to the LGPL.
Perfect! Thank you very much for your time...
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free P
19 matches
Mail list logo
