> > I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if
> > we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license
> > it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our
> > executable. Does this pose any issues for us?
> 
> MPL is not (modified) LGPL compatible either, so you need a dual  
> license.

Hmm. Where did you get that? Do you btw understand the nature of the
MPL<->(L)GPL incompability?
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to