> > I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if > > we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license > > it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our > > executable. Does this pose any issues for us? > > MPL is not (modified) LGPL compatible either, so you need a dual > license.
Hmm. Where did you get that? Do you btw understand the nature of the MPL<->(L)GPL incompability? _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal