On 18 Jun 2008, at 10:33, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I'm part of the core developers for tiOPF and am pretty sure that if
we need to change tiOPF's license to a Modified LGPL or dual license
it, it should be possible. Again, we link tiOPF directly into our
executable. Does this pose any issues for us?
MPL is not (modified) LGPL compatible either, so you need a dual
license.
Hmm. Where did you get that? Do you btw understand the nature of the
MPL<->(L)GPL incompability?
Here's an explanation: http://www.tomhull.com/ocston/docs/mozgpl.html
(Most of) the arguments there apply equally to the LGPL as they do to
the GPL. Mozilla.org also explains this: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html#why-relicensing
Jonas
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
