Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From:"Michael Van Canneyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new > Date sent: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:10:36 +0100 > > > > > .. I'll drop back to the 1.0.10. > > > > > > Inst

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-03 Thread xhajt03
From:"Michael Van Canneyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new Date sent: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:10:36 +0100 > > > .. I'll drop back to the 1.0.10. > > > > Installed 1.0.10 and it built everything just hunky > > dory. > >

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-03 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Michael A. Hess wrote: > Michael A. Hess wrote: > > > > .. I'll drop back to the 1.0.10. > > Installed 1.0.10 and it built everything just hunky dory. > > Now I have a question about the size of the exe. > > After it is built the size is 1.3 meg. > > I tried to run stripw on

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael A. Hess
Michael A. Hess wrote: .. I'll drop back to the 1.0.10. Installed 1.0.10 and it built everything just hunky dory. Now I have a question about the size of the exe. After it is built the size is 1.3 meg. I tried to run stripw on it but it doesn't reduce it at all. Did the file really jump to that

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:03:16 +0100 (CET) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Fixed. > > Thanks, but ATM fpwritetga.pp doesn't compile, due to missing KeyIndentification > and FromWord in TFPWriterTarga.SaveHeader And again fixed... This is b

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:03:16 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Fixed. Thanks, but ATM fpwritetga.pp doesn't compile, due to missing KeyIndentification and FromWord in TFPWriterTarga.SaveHeader Regards, Vincent. ___ fpc-pascal maillist -

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:19:24 -0500 > kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > went so far as to completely reinstall 1.0.10 just to be on the safe > > side, and i'm still getting the same error I was w/ the cvs compiler i > > had been using ... >

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:19:24 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > went so far as to completely reinstall 1.0.10 just to be on the safe > side, and i'm still getting the same error I was w/ the cvs compiler i > had been using ... > > make -C image clean > Makefile:154: *** The Makefile doe

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
Vincent Snijders wrote: On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh,

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
Vincent Snijders wrote: On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh,

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >These are known problems. > >You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. > >Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. > > > > > oh, so if i've al

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh, so if i've already built / installed cvs version, then have to remove that and re-install 1.0.10 to build

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Michael A. Hess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > These are known problems. > > You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. > > Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. > > H. I was trying the same thing last week

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael A. Hess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. H. I was trying the same thing last week before my Win32 system crashed and was getting similar problems when

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Michael A. Hess wrote: > Greetings, > > I have been trying to cycle a new Win32 compiler so that I can make a > complete Lazarus distro which includes the compiler. > > I have the 1.9.2 binary release and am trying to cycle a new compiler > from CVS code. It fails at vari