Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-05 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Reinier Olislagers schrieb: >On 5-6-2013 22:02, Florian Klämpfl wrote: >> Am 05.06.2013 07:37, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: >>> That's understandable - so to clarify: you're not opposed to an LLVM >>> backend, you're just not going to write one yourself, right? >> >> I'am opposed to an LLVM bac

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-05 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 5-6-2013 22:02, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Am 05.06.2013 07:37, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: >> That's understandable - so to clarify: you're not opposed to an LLVM >> backend, you're just not going to write one yourself, right? > > I'am opposed to an LLVM backend but if Jonas implements one I can

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-05 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Am 05.06.2013 07:37, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: >> Actually, I meant/said I'am not interested in working on one. For me the >> backend work is the interesting work, everything else is just boring >> duty :) > > > That's understandable - so to clarify: you're not opposed to an LLVM > backend, yo

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 4-6-2013 20:05, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Am 29.05.2013 06:25, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble be

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-04 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 4-6-2013 20:05, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Am 29.05.2013 06:25, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: >> On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: >>> On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble believing LLVM backend support would b

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-06-04 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Am 29.05.2013 06:25, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line perhaps be removed. Whe

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-05-28 Thread Sven Barth
On 29.05.2013 06:25, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line perhaps be removed. Where

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-05-28 Thread Reinier Olislagers
On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: > On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble >> believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line >> perhaps be removed. > > Where in the discussions did we mention th

Re: [fpc-pascal] http://www.freepascal.org/future.var

2013-05-28 Thread Sven Barth
On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: On this page: http://www.freepascal.org/future.var this is mentioned: Planned for later versions ... LLVM backend support Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should t