On 4-6-2013 20:05, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > Am 29.05.2013 06:25, schrieb Reinier Olislagers: >> On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: >>> On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >>>> Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble >>>> believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line >>>> perhaps be removed. >>> >>> Where in the discussions did we mention that we do not want a LLVM >>> backend? >> Florian saying he didn't want an LLVM backend. > > Actually, I meant/said I'am not interested in working on one. For me the > backend work is the interesting work, everything else is just boring > duty :)
That's understandable - so to clarify: you're not opposed to an LLVM backend, you're just not going to write one yourself, right? Thanks, Reinier _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
