On 28-5-2013 19:16, Sven Barth wrote: > On 28.05.2013 17:41, Reinier Olislagers wrote: >> Going by the discussions on this mailing list I'm having trouble >> believing LLVM backend support would be in the plans. Should this line >> perhaps be removed. > > Where in the discussions did we mention that we do not want a LLVM > backend? Florian saying he didn't want an LLVM backend.
> We even had a LLVM branch some time ago! The only point is that > a LLVM backend will be only one backend among the others unlike in the > new Delphi compiler. We are not going to give up our existing backends! Fine by me, glad that decision has been taken! > Also this point is mentioned under "Planned for later versions".<snip stuff > about time> Yes, I think I understood what "later version" means... Thanks for your quick and clear reply, Reinier _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
