On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:31:46 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 16 Jul 2008, at 15:39, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
>
> > Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> The problem is that there is no download page with explanations on
> >> sourceforge (I don't know whether it's
On 16 Jul 2008, at 15:39, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The problem is that there is no download page with explanations on
sourceforge (I don't know whether it's even possible to do that). You
can see it on all of the regular download pages. That release wa
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 16 Jul 2008, at 14:56, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
>
> > Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Well, if it found units before you did that, you probably had
> >> a .fpc.cfg somewhere in your home directory already.
> >
> > Maybe. I didn't
On 16 Jul 2008, at 14:56, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, if it found units before you did that, you probably had
a .fpc.cfg somewhere in your home directory already.
Maybe. I didn't check.
I called samplecfg first as normal user and so samplecfg igno
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 16 Jul 2008, at 13:15, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
>
> > Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> This is strange, since the FPC config files all use $fpcversion to
> >> set
> >> the unit paths.
> >
> > BTW, for some reasons 'make install' di
On 16 Jul 2008, at 13:15, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is strange, since the FPC config files all use $fpcversion to
set
the unit paths.
BTW, for some reasons 'make install' did not recreate the /etc/
fpc.cfg.
That is by design. /etc/fpc.cfg is
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 16 Jul 2008, at 10:26, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
>
> > Maybe you misunderstood: I did not use the lazarus 'make install'.
> > I installed fpc with 'make install'. This installed fpc 2.3.1 in a
> > separate
> > directory (/usr/local/lib/fpc/2.3.1) (sep
On 16 Jul 2008, at 10:26, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
Maybe you misunderstood: I did not use the lazarus 'make install'.
I installed fpc with 'make install'. This installed fpc 2.3.1 in a
separate
directory (/usr/local/lib/fpc/2.3.1) (separate from the prior
installed fpc
2.2.2rc1).
And I did a
Zitat von Schindler Karl-Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am 16. Jul 2008 um 09:44 schrieb Mattias Gärtner:
>
> > Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>
> >> On 15 Jul 2008, at 00:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> >>
> >>> Now only the wrong file formats.
> >>> zbase, gzio, crc, zdeflate, .
Am 16. Jul 2008 um 10:00 schrieb Jonas Maebe:
On 16 Jul 2008, at 09:44, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
I removed all fpc .o/.ppu files under /usr/local/lib and in
lazarus. Then it
worked. Apparently somewhere the fpc make install / lazarus make
clean does not
replace/delete all files.
make insta
On 16 Jul 2008, at 09:44, Mattias Gärtner wrote:
I removed all fpc .o/.ppu files under /usr/local/lib and in lazarus.
Then it
worked. Apparently somewhere the fpc make install / lazarus make
clean does not
replace/delete all files.
make install does not explicitly delete anything, at most
Am 16. Jul 2008 um 09:44 schrieb Mattias Gärtner:
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 15 Jul 2008, at 00:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Now only the wrong file formats.
zbase, gzio, crc, zdeflate, ... inffast. Hmm. These are only the .o
files in paszlib.
I can't reproduce it. One t
Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 15 Jul 2008, at 00:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > Now only the wrong file formats.
> > zbase, gzio, crc, zdeflate, ... inffast. Hmm. These are only the .o
> > files in paszlib.
>
> I can't reproduce it. One thing you can try is compiling with -C
On 15 Jul 2008, at 00:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Now only the wrong file formats.
zbase, gzio, crc, zdeflate, ... inffast. Hmm. These are only the .o
files in paszlib.
I can't reproduce it. One thing you can try is compiling with -Cn and
checking the generated link.res file to make sure th
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:51:30 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2008, at 23:03, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:58:29 +0200
> > Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> * The new linker deals differently with stabs debug information
On 14 Jul 2008, at 23:14, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The unknown stabs are only in the LCL units, not in the FPC units. So
apparently FPC knows a trick.
Does someone know the trick?
The "trick" is not using local constants.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maill
On 14 Jul 2008, at 23:03, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:58:29 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
* The new linker deals differently with stabs debug information
compared to previous versions, causing a lot of "Unknown stabs"
warnings and also some errors durin
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:03:26 +0200
Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:58:29 +0200
> Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > * The new linker deals differently with stabs debug information
> > compared to previous versions, causing a lot of "Unknow
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:58:29 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
> * The new linker deals differently with stabs debug information
> compared to previous versions, causing a lot of "Unknown stabs"
> warnings and also some errors during linking
> - Effect: you can't compile code
19 matches
Mail list logo
