Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 16 Jul 2008, at 13:15, Mattias Gärtner wrote: > > > Zitat von Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> This is strange, since the FPC config files all use $fpcversion to > >> set > >> the unit paths. > > > > BTW, for some reasons 'make install' did not recreate the /etc/ > > fpc.cfg. > > That is by design. /etc/fpc.cfg is only created by the installers of > releases on our website. > > > I did it > > manually by calling samplecfg with $fpcversion. But it did not make > > any > > difference. The errors stayed the same. > > Well, if it found units before you did that, you probably had > a .fpc.cfg somewhere in your home directory already.
Maybe. I didn't check. I called samplecfg first as normal user and so samplecfg ignored my parameters and wrote the config to my home directory. A strange automatism. I deleted it and ran it again with sudo. But if there was an ~/.fpc.cfg, then it could only be created by 2.2.0 or the 2.2.2rc1 snapshot. Maybe through the above automatism? But they all used $fpcversion, don't they? If yes, then all fpc versions should create a useful fpc.cfg? > >> There was also no 2.2.2rc1 release for Mac OS X > >> (although it may have been distributed along with some Lazarus > >> snapshot(s)). > > > > Yes, I had to use the lazarus snapshot of fpc as start compiler, > > because the > > 2.2.0 failed to compile fpc 2.2.3 and 2.3.1 (Access Violation). What > > is the > > current startup compiler for Mac OS X 10.5? > > That issue is documented on the FPC Mac OS X download pages and 2.2.1 > starting packages for Mac OS X 10.5.x are are provided there. Where? I did this: drove browser to www.freepascal.org, click on download on the right panel, then Binaries / intel/i386 / Mac OS X, choose as mirror Sourceforge, and there is only the 2.2.0 version. Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
