On Friday 18 January 2008 20:12, John Stoneham wrote:
[Ada package system]
> However, you can also do:
> with Unit_1; use Unit_1;
> This imports the namespace of Unit_1 into the current file so that
> now you *can* refernce "foo" without a qualifier. It's as if all the
> identifiers in Unit_1 w
Jonas wrote:
> >> The magic word would be "scope" here. It's the same as with using two
> >> different units including the same identifier twice.
> >
> > Yes and no, of course it will work, but might be counterintuitive.
> >
> > uses x, a.b.c;
> >
> > a.b.c.d.
> >
> > if x also contains an identif
On 1/18/08, Vinzent Höfler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the other hand:
> >
> > uses a;
> >
> > var a:byte;
> >
> > ... both unit a as variable a would go into the global symtable, which
> > is the same lexical level, thus causing duplicate identifier conflicts.
>
> In Ada the fully qualified
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Vinzent Höfler:
Maybe my view is skewed too much by the use of Ada where even a
function declares a "record identifier". In Ada it is even possible to
do:
---
procedure Test is
X : Integer;
procedure B is
X : Integer;
begin
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
You are wrong. It does not compile, neither in delphi, nor in FPC.
D is not found, because 'A' resolves to the local a, and then the
search is stopped.
Ok, I think I got it. It's probably the same reason why in
---
procedure Foo (const A : My_Type); overload;
proce
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Vinzent Höfler:
Maybe my view is skewed too much by the use of Ada where even a function
declares a "record identifier". In Ada it is even possible to do:
---
procedure Test is
X : Integer;
procedure B is
X : Integer;
begin
X := 1;
Tes
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Vinzent Hoefler:
On Friday 18 January 2008 16:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler,
it d
> On Friday 18 January 2008 15:50, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > Of course not:
> >
> > tell me, what does a.b.c.d mean if you have a record a with field b,
> > and you have a uses a.b.c in your uses clause ?
>
> The magic word would be "scope" here. It's the same as with using two
> differe
On 18 Jan 2008, at 16:35, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The magic word would be "scope" here. It's the same as with using two
different units including the same identifier twice.
Yes and no, of course it will work, but might be counterintuitive.
uses x, a.b.c;
a.b.c.d.
if x also contains an id
On Friday 18 January 2008 16:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
> > > To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler,
> > > it doesn't know how to map the a.b.c.d:
> >
> > Well, with norm
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Vinzent Hoefler:
On Friday 18 January 2008 16:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler,
it doesn't know how to map
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2008 16:04, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
> > > Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
> > > > To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler,
> > > > it doe
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2008 15:50, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 January 2008 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > > > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that.
> >
On Friday 18 January 2008 15:50, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> > On Friday 18 January 2008 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that.
> > > > In Win32 its is Just dots in the name, nothing else
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler, it doesn't
know how to map the a.b.c.d:
Well, with normal Pascal rules, you
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
>
> Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> > To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler, it doesn't
> > know how to map the a.b.c.d:
>
> Well, with normal Pascal rules, you cannot declare a variable with the sam
Op Fri, 18 Jan 2008, schreef Michael Van Canneyt:
To the user, it may appear as a bunch of dots. To the compiler, it doesn't
know how to map the a.b.c.d:
Well, with normal Pascal rules, you cannot declare a variable with the
same name as a unit you use, because a unit is also an identifier.
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>
> > On Friday 18 January 2008 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> > > > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that.
> > > > In Win32 its is Just dots in the name, nothing else.
> so
>
> unit a.b.c;
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2008 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> > > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that.
> > > In Win32 its is Just dots in the name, nothing else.
> >
> > If he said that, he is totally braindead and doesn't
On Friday 18 January 2008 15:19, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that.
> > In Win32 its is Just dots in the name, nothing else.
>
> If he said that, he is totally braindead and doesn't have a clue
> about what he is talking.
Well, the discuss
> > - Can someone provide the grammar how an identifier looks like in
Delphi?
> > - How shall the compiler detect that "a.b" is an unit if a is also
defined
> as a record that
> > doesn't contain a field b?
> > - How shall the compiler handle if "a.b.c" is an unit and a.b.c is
class?
> >
> > So p
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Cesar Liws Gmail wrote:
>
>
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Marco van de
> Voort
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2008 06:05
> Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] dot within
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Marco van de
Voort
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2008 06:05
Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] dot within unit file name
> - Can someone provide the grammar how an identif
23 matches
Mail list logo
