On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Cesar Liws Gmail wrote:
> > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Marco van de > Voort > Enviada em: sexta-feira, 18 de janeiro de 2008 06:05 > Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions > Assunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] dot within unit file name > > > - Can someone provide the grammar how an identifier looks like in Delphi? > > - How shall the compiler detect that "a.b" is an unit if a is also defined > as a record that > > doesn't contain a field b? > > - How shall the compiler handle if "a.b.c" is an unit and a.b.c is class? > > > > So please come with a design instead of just asking give me this feature > in one line. Because if > > the feature was really important and simple it was for sure already > implemented. The left over > > features are therefor not in the category simple anymore. Also important > is debatable because > > we've already lived without them for years. > > > More over it should map one to one to what Delphi does, since it is a > > compability item. > > > Also have a look at http://www.freepascal.org/faq.var#extensionselect for > > how to do file a proper proposal. > > > I saw this week a CodeGear Guy in a cg ng talking about that. > In Win32 its is Just dots in the name, nothing else. If he said that, he is totally braindead and doesn't have a clue about what he is talking. And also, ECO doesn't work on win32, it requires .NET :) Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
