On 18 Jan 2008, at 16:35, Marco van de Voort wrote:
The magic word would be "scope" here. It's the same as with using two
different units including the same identifier twice.
Yes and no, of course it will work, but might be counterintuitive.
uses x, a.b.c;
a.b.c.d.
if x also contains an identifier "a".
error : a.b.c.d identifier not found. (but a.b.c.d exists).
We already print fully qualified identifiers in some error messages
in case confusion is possible (e.g. unit1.type1 expected, but got
unit2.type1).
Jonas
PS: could you configure your mail client so it inserts an attribution
line at the top? (it's hard to follow who wrote what)
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
