Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005, at 22:51, Éric DÉTREZ wrote:
I know how to start X11.
Is it the right X-Windows ?
Yes.
But how to start then Lazarus ?
Simply typing "lazarus" in the xterm window should work. If it doesn't,
try
/usr/local/bin/lazarus
I am not sure there is a sy
>I am in favor of uniting this parts. I think it adds a lot to both of
>the projects. Specially we should take a good look on how to improve
>the security on the websites.
A 100 percent Pascal based, secure Web Forum, Content Management System (CMS),
Wiki, Bug
Reporter, and program/unit Repos
On 10/29/05, Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Pelton schrieb:
>
> > another thing that most java ide's do, which may or may not apply to
> > lazarus, is that most IDE's have the ability to support more than one
> > compiler suite at a time.
>
> Yes but that is quite meaningless f
Tony Pelton schrieb:
> well, firstly, there appears to be at least one other decent IDE that
> i know of :
>
> http://www.bloodshed.net/devpascal.html
>
> but in any event, i'm not sure why that distinction is important.
Lazarus is the IDE important for over 95% of all people.
> i think the p
On 10/29/05, Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Pelton schrieb:
> >
> > their (sun's) model is one where they offer the bundle that you need,
> > where you may want a big thick bundle with the Java compiler and
> > runtime and IDE, or you may already have the Java runtime and
> > c
Mattias Gaertner schrieb:
>
> Note:
> Lazarus has different release dates than FPC, so bug tracking and download
> directories should only have related pages, but the difference must stay
> clear for the user. For instance the released and stable FPC 2.0 should not
> be confused with the lazarus b
On 29 Oct 2005, at 22:51, Éric DÉTREZ wrote:
I know how to start X11.
Is it the right X-Windows ?
Yes.
But how to start then Lazarus ?
Simply typing "lazarus" in the xterm window should work. If it
doesn't, try
/usr/local/bin/lazarus
Jonas
On 10/29/05, Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Pelton schrieb:
> For Java the situation is different. There are lots of IDEs, but Free
> Pascal has only one major IDE.
> Of course the talk is _not_ about a complete fusion of FPC and Lazarus.
> 'Only' the following parts should be
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:38:10 +0200
Sebastian Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Pelton schrieb:
> >
> > their (sun's) model is one where they offer the bundle that you need,
> > where you may want a big thick bundle with the Java compiler and
> > runtime and IDE, or you may already have th
Tony Pelton schrieb:
>
> their (sun's) model is one where they offer the bundle that you need,
> where you may want a big thick bundle with the Java compiler and
> runtime and IDE, or you may already have the Java runtime and
> compiler, and just need the IDE.
For Java the situation is different.
On 10/29/05, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L505 wrote:
>
> >>
> >>I think that FPC has to remain FPC, a language + compiler just like GCC.
> >>IDE and Lazarus could be run on top of FPC, like many IDE run on top of
> >>GCC.
that would be my preference, not that my preferences matte
Le 29 oct. 05 à 22:16, Paul Davidson a écrit :
One must start X-Windows from terminal, then start Lazarus.
I know how to start X11.
Is it the right X-Windows ?
But how to start then Lazarus ?
I really feel stupid.
ÉrIc Détrez
Mathématiques & informatique (Faidherbe Lille)
Europe pas morte
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:38:05 -0700
L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > No, this doesn't match with our experiences we had at the systems: a lot
> > of people said, yes, I tried fpc but I didn't like to work with the
> > command line. When we asked, did you try lazarus, the answer was, no, I
> >
One must start X-Windows from terminal, then start Lazarus.
You could also try this site.
All are .dmg files, friendly to Macs
Try http://www.ca.freepascal.org/Lazarus/
On Oct 29, 2005, at 16:11, Éric DÉTREZ wrote:
Le 29 oct. 05 à 21:22, Florian Klaempfl a écrit :
When we asked, did you try
Le 29 oct. 05 à 21:22, Florian Klaempfl a écrit :
When we asked, did you try lazarus, the answer was, no, I didn't
know about it.
So I try lazarus.
I download it (Lazarus, new fpc, fpcsrc (?))
But I don't find it anywhere.
No lazarus, even in the Terminal.
I'm a mac osx user.
Can anybody he
> In an FAQ section:
>
> Question:
> What is FPC exactly, and what is lazarus?
>
> Answer:
> If you come from a delphi background, consider FPC like DCC. FPC is not an
> IDE, just like
> DCC is not an IDE.
>
> Question:
> What is DCC, I don't know what that stands for?
>
> Answer:
> That is t
> No, this doesn't match with our experiences we had at the systems: a lot
> of people said, yes, I tried fpc but I didn't like to work with the
> command line. When we asked, did you try lazarus, the answer was, no, I
> didn't know about it.
Of course, but I don't think you mean mean the project
L505 wrote:
I got few suggestions, especially to target more Delphi developers.
1. Maybe it'll better for public and new users to know 1 product
instead of two: FPC (the compiler) and Lazarus (the IDE). Just like
Delphi for the compiler and the IDE in a single package. I still got
many times qu
> > I got few suggestions, especially to target more Delphi developers.
> >
> > 1. Maybe it'll better for public and new users to know 1 product
> > instead of two: FPC (the compiler) and Lazarus (the IDE). Just like
> > Delphi for the compiler and the IDE in a single package. I still got
> > many
I got few suggestions, especially to target more Delphi developers.
1. Maybe it'll better for public and new users to know 1 product
instead of two: FPC (the compiler) and Lazarus (the IDE). Just like
Delphi for the compiler and the IDE in a single package. I still got
many times question l
It's a great news to know FPC and Lazarus getting more and more popular and
starting to be counted in serious software development. I'm really glad to hear
and see this. :)
I got few suggestions, especially to target more Delphi developers.
1. Maybe it'll better for public and new users to kno
> Hello *,
>
> I've written a first small summary about our experiences at Systems 2005 in
> Munich, Germany, this week:
> http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Systems_2005
>
> probably more detailed information will follow within the next few days.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
Those a
Hello *,
I've written a first small summary about our experiences at Systems 2005 in
Munich, Germany, this week:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Systems_2005
probably more detailed information will follow within the next few days.
Regards,
Sebastian
--
Telefonieren Sie schon oder spa
23 matches
Mail list logo