On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:38:05 -0700 L505 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, this doesn't match with our experiences we had at the systems: a lot > > of people said, yes, I tried fpc but I didn't like to work with the > > command line. When we asked, did you try lazarus, the answer was, no, I > > didn't know about it. > > Of course, but I don't think you mean mean the projects have to merge, it > just means the advertising has to merge (cross-advertise each other > more).. I'm sure the FPC team doesn't want to merge with lazarus? Just > change the marketing/advertising tactics right?
Correct. > i.e. maybe in big bold font on the FPC website: > "Lazarus is the major IDE that uses FPC" or something similar. > > In an FAQ section: > > Question: > What is FPC exactly, and what is lazarus? > > Answer: > If you come from a delphi background, consider FPC like DCC. FPC is not > an IDE, just like > DCC is not an IDE. > > Question: > What is DCC, I don't know what that stands for? > > Answer: > That is the compiler that powers the Delphi IDE. Ok - at least for delphians. The 'systems' showed that there are a lot of non delphians interested in FPC+Laz. Mattias _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
