On 6 November 2011 22:28, Frank Church wrote:
> If that is the case then a lot of Free Pascal and Delphi demos are teaching
> bad practices because they make most members accessible externally when
> there is no real reason to. I never thought about that much because I just
> wanted to get my apps
I installed Kubuntu from a USB Stick (you can dd the iso file to an usb-stick
and then boot from it, very userfriendly!)
http://www.kubuntu.org
There is also a userfriendly package manager included.
http://www.packagekit.org
With this package manager it was the first time, that I installed very
On 06.11.2011 21:28, Frank Church wrote:
If that is the case then a lot of Free Pascal and Delphi demos are
teaching bad practices because they make most members accessible
externally when there is no real reason to. I never thought about that
much because I just wanted to get my apps working rat
On 6 November 2011 18:33, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 06 Nov 2011, at 19:26, Frank Church wrote:
>
> > So it means that unless a field or method is in the private or protected
> > section
>
> or published, strict private or strict protected section
>
> > it is automatically public?
>
> Yes (or publ
Am 06.11.2011 19:21, schrieb Jürgen Hestermann:
> Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
>>> I have the same feeling as Dmitry: There must be a time when FPC does
>>> not run after Delphi. Why not now?
>> Feel free to start a fork and we will see what will make it into trunk.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know what yo
In our previous episode, Seth Grover said:
> > We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> > version 2.6.0 on our ftp-servers.
>
> Congratulations! That's an impressive list of new features. I've been
> anticipating this release for some time.
>
> A couple of question
On 06 Nov 2011, at 19:21, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
> Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
> >> I have the same feeling as Dmitry: There must be a time when FPC does
> >> not run after Delphi. Why not now?
> > Feel free to start a fork and we will see what will make it into trunk.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know
In our previous episode, J?rgen Hestermann said:
> > version 2.6.0 on our ftp-servers.
>
> Here some issues I found:
>
> The text mode IDE states under "Help": Copyright (C) 1998-2009 by...
> Shouldn't this be "1998-2011"?
I will correct that.
> When I now try to compile a short test progra
On 06 Nov 2011, at 19:26, Frank Church wrote:
> So it means that unless a field or method is in the private or protected
> section
or published, strict private or strict protected section
> it is automatically public?
Yes (or published in case of {$m+}, as Michael added).
Jonas
_
On 6 November 2011 14:43, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:34, Frank Church wrote:
>
> > What is the difference between field declarations at the beginning of a
> > class and those declared in the public section?
>
> There is no "the" public section. You can declare as many public (an
Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
>> I have the same feeling as Dmitry: There must be a time when FPC does
>> not run after Delphi. Why not now?
> Feel free to start a fork and we will see what will make it into trunk.
Sorry, but I don't know what you are talking about. Isn't it you (and a
few others) wh
Am 06.11.2011 18:24, schrieb Jürgen Hestermann:
> Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
>> Am 06.11.2011 15:13, schrieb dmitry boyarintsev:
>>> Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
>> You mix here result and goal. If FPC supports new Delphi constructs
>> depends on the fact if some
Florian Klämpfl schrieb:
> Am 06.11.2011 15:13, schrieb dmitry boyarintsev:
>> Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
> You mix here result and goal. If FPC supports new Delphi constructs
> depends on the fact if somebody provides a patch. No more, no less.
I have the
Am 06.11.2011 15:13, schrieb dmitry boyarintsev:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> OK, agreed, this is more readable than Delphi syntax. But ...
>> 1) If we implement lamdas is FPC we will have to support Delphi syntax.
>
> Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:34, Frank Church wrote:
What is the difference between field declarations at the beginning of a
class and those declared in the public section?
There is no "the" public section. You can declare as many public (and private,
and
06.11.2011 18:13, dmitry boyarintsev пишет:
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
OK, agreed, this is more readable than Delphi syntax. But ...
1) If we implement lamdas is FPC we will have to support Delphi syntax.
Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi
On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:34, Frank Church wrote:
> What is the difference between field declarations at the beginning of a
> class and those declared in the public section?
There is no "the" public section. You can declare as many public (and private,
and ...) sections as you want.
> They are all
What is the difference between field declarations at the beginning of a
class and those declared in the public section?
They are all visible aren't they, what is the conceptual difference between
them?
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
_
On 06 Nov 2011, at 15:13, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
> Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
If we want to offer compatibility with source code written for Delphi, which
does happen to be one of FPC's project goals, then yes, we do have to do that
to some extent.
>
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> OK, agreed, this is more readable than Delphi syntax. But ...
> 1) If we implement lamdas is FPC we will have to support Delphi syntax.
Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
Their technical decisions are dire
2011/11/6 Florian Klämpfl :
> It would be probably more clear to write and this more pascalish:
>
> Procedure SomeOuter;
>
> Var
> d,e,f : SomeType;
>
> Lambda Procedure
> SomeInner(targetobject:ttargetobject;a:integer;b:someobject;c:string)
> begin
> targetobject.destinationprocedure(a,b,c)
On 06 Nov 2011, at 11:56, Tommi Prami wrote:
> On 6.11.2011 1:27, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>> Details about these new features can be found at
>> http://wiki.freepascal.org/FPC_New_Features_2.6.0
>
> Seems that Freepascal Wiki is not available. If someone can access it post
> the information o
06.11.2011 15:53, Florian Klämpfl пишет:
Am 05.11.2011 22:58, schrieb Alexander Shishkin:
06.11.2011 1:46, Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Bernd wrote:
2011/10/25:
targethread.queue(
procedure(targetobject:ttargetobject;a:integer;b:someobject;c:string)
begin
On 6.11.2011 1:27, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.6.0 on our ftp-servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 2.6.0 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done her
2011/11/6 Michael Van Canneyt :
> I am not against closure functionality, although I highly doubt it is *that*
> useful as some people make it out to be. Even so, I use it in my Javascript
> programming.
I'm also not entirely sure about the necessity of closures in OP, but
I must admit I am not t
Am 05.11.2011 22:58, schrieb Alexander Shishkin:
> 06.11.2011 1:46, Michael Van Canneyt пишет:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Bernd wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/10/25 :
>>>
> targethread.queue(
> procedure(targetobject:ttargetobject;a:integer;b:someobject;c:string)
> begin
>
In our previous episode, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara said:
> >
> > ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/
>
> Cant download
>
> 550 /pub/fpc/beta/2.6.0-rc1/: Permission denied.
Fixed.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.o
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
> version 2.6.0 on our ftp-servers.
Here some issues I found:
The text mode IDE states under "Help": Copyright (C) 1998-2009 by...
Shouldn't this be "1998-2011"?
When I now try to compile a
28 matches
Mail list logo
