Am 06.11.2011 15:13, schrieb dmitry boyarintsev: > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Alexander Shishkin <alexv...@mail.ru> wrote: >> OK, agreed, this is more readable than Delphi syntax. But ... >> 1) If we implement lamdas is FPC we will have to support Delphi syntax. > > Hi-jacking, the thread, and again should FPC chase Delphi forever?
You mix here result and goal. If FPC supports new Delphi constructs depends on the fact if somebody provides a patch. No more, no less. Just as an example: if somebody provides patches to support Extended Pascal, FPC will support Extended Pascal, nobody did so in >15 years. Result: FPC supports no Extended Pascal features. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
