Jonas Maebe schrieb:
>
> On 24 Aug 2007, at 08:31, Werner Bochtler wrote:
>
>> I have a running installation of Darwin 8.0 (x86) in a virtual machine
>> (vmware). Can anyone give me some hints how to install the current
>> snapshot of FPC in this environment. I was not able to locate a working
>>
Am Sonntag, den 26.08.2007, 13:43 -0300 schrieb Joao Morais:
> Marc Santhoff wrote:
> > I want to read in text files containing matrix data. The data is
> > organized in rectangular manner, but some places are not valid because
> > they are from physical measurements at places that are not reachabl
Joao Morais wrote:
I simply don't know how to register the issue since I can't create a
small sample that reproduce it, but I can send about 1 mb of sources to
a volunteer though.
Was this one forgotten? Let me know how can I help.
--
Joao Morais
_
Marc Santhoff wrote:
I want to read in text files containing matrix data. The data is
organized in rectangular manner, but some places are not valid because
they are from physical measurements at places that are not reachable by
any instrument.
In this data files I have to use a convention to de
I am running under linux - but I'm not using initalization or
finalization sections, so i think i'm ok.
thanks for the info
bd
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:07:44 +0200
Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26 Aug 2007, at 15:00, Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
> > An FPC .so can be a perfect re
> > with boehm directly by redirecting the memory manager calls, however now
> > that you've mentioned it could be a solution, my question is should
> > an fpc .so be a direct replacement for a C .so?
>
> An FPC .so can be a perfect replacement for a C .so. I'm not aware of
> limitations.
Note,
Thanks ,
That removes some variables from my bug hunt.
Cheers
bd
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:00:11 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef blackdog:
>
> >
> > Hi Daniël
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply. I don't necessarily want fpc to inter
On 26 Aug 2007, at 15:00, Daniël Mantione wrote:
An FPC .so can be a perfect replacement for a C .so. I'm not aware of
limitations.
Except for a bug caused by the *prt*.as -> si_*prc*.inc transition
which means that currently under Linux the initialization sections
are not executed:
http
On 24 Aug 2007, at 08:31, Werner Bochtler wrote:
I have a running installation of Darwin 8.0 (x86) in a virtual machine
(vmware). Can anyone give me some hints how to install the current
snapshot of FPC in this environment. I was not able to locate a
working
FPC 2.0 binary for Darwin (x86) to
Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef blackdog:
>
> Hi Daniël
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. I don't necessarily want fpc to interact
> with boehm directly by redirecting the memory manager calls, however now
> that you've mentioned it could be a solution, my question is should
> an fpc .so be a direc
Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef Robert Wolfe:
> Hi all! I would like to add Win64 cross compiling capabilities to the
> FP.EXE editor. I was wondering if anyone has done this already and if so,
> how?
That is not possible as there can be only only code generator inside the
IDE. The IDE can be c
> > Any points in the right direction would be helpful.
>
> How about lnet ? It's "Official" FPC socket library multi-platform,
No it's not :-)
And afaik Indy already comes with a socket server.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.o
On 8/26/07, Robert Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second posting to the mailing list this morning.
>
> I am wanting to write an SMTP server using FPC. However, I am having a
> tough time trying to find libraries/units that will allow me to do so. I
> know about Synapse as I use that to write
Second posting to the mailing list this morning.
I am wanting to write an SMTP server using FPC. However, I am having a
tough time trying to find libraries/units that will allow me to do so. I
know about Synapse as I use that to write client software. Now I just need
something to write software
Hi all! I would like to add Win64 cross compiling capabilities to the
FP.EXE editor. I was wondering if anyone has done this already and if so,
how?
Robert Wolfe [MCP/Linux+] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shatter IT Global Services, LLC
http://www.shatterit.com
Hi Daniël
Thanks for the quick reply. I don't necessarily want fpc to interact
with boehm directly by redirecting the memory manager calls, however now
that you've mentioned it could be a solution, my question is should
an fpc .so be a direct replacement for a C .so? Can you think of any
reason w
On 26 Aug 2007, at 13:53, Daniël Mantione wrote:
Neko uses the boehm garbage collector, so my question is, does
fpc play well with boehm? My assumption has been that fpc
could be used as a straight replacement for C.
I'm not aware of any uses in practice, but I expect it will work.
Someone
Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef blackdog:
>
> Hi List
>
> This is my first post to the list and I'm new to fpc too.
>
> I'm interested in using fpc to create .so/.dll for the Neko
> virtual machine (http://www.nekovm.org), instead of using C for the same
> task. So that means translating header
Hi List
This is my first post to the list and I'm new to fpc too.
I'm interested in using fpc to create .so/.dll for the Neko
virtual machine (http://www.nekovm.org), instead of using C for the same
task. So that means translating header files. I've done some of this
and had some success but I'
19 matches
Mail list logo
