Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef blackdog:
>
> Hi Daniël
>
> Thanks for the quick reply. I don't necessarily want fpc to interact
> with boehm directly by redirecting the memory manager calls, however now
> that you've mentioned it could be a solution, my question is should
> an fpc .so be a direct replacement for a C .so?
An FPC .so can be a perfect replacement for a C .so. I'm not aware of
limitations.
> Can you think of any
> reason when that would not be the case - apart from bad translation of
> header files. For example, neko uses dlopen with RTLD_LAZY to load
> the .so, does fpc expect RTLD_NOW or anything like that?
No, it should work.
Daniël
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
