Thanks , That removes some variables from my bug hunt.
Cheers bd On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Op Sun, 26 Aug 2007, schreef blackdog: > > > > > Hi Daniël > > > > Thanks for the quick reply. I don't necessarily want fpc to interact > > with boehm directly by redirecting the memory manager calls, > > however now that you've mentioned it could be a solution, my > > question is should an fpc .so be a direct replacement for a C .so? > > An FPC .so can be a perfect replacement for a C .so. I'm not aware of > limitations. > > > Can you think of any > > reason when that would not be the case - apart from bad translation > > of header files. For example, neko uses dlopen with RTLD_LAZY to > > load the .so, does fpc expect RTLD_NOW or anything like that? > > No, it should work. > > Daniël _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
