Pianoman wrote:
> Hello everyone, I have got interesting results from my test of SSE2
> switch.
> I tested a small code fragment with and without SSE2 swith and I Saw no
> difference.
> Why is this?
> Iused FPC 2.0 on WIN 32 to compile it with Best optimization
> Code fragment follows:
> {$fpu
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Luiz Américo wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > >
> > > However, it is not completely clear to me where the boundary is
> > > between
> > > RTL and FCL. Classes is listed under FCL, and is documented under
> > > RTL.
> >
> >
> > Classes is RTL. I will up
Hello everyone, I have got interesting results from my test of SSE2
switch.
I tested a small code fragment with and without SSE2 swith and I Saw no
difference.
Why is this?
Iused FPC 2.0 on WIN 32 to compile it with Best optimization
Code fragment follows:
{$fputype sse2}
program divide;
uses w
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[..]
However, it is not completely clear to me where the boundary is between
RTL and FCL. Classes is listed under FCL, and is documented under RTL.
Classes is RTL. I will update the web page.
At least in subversion fixes branch, classes unit is present in both
