On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Luiz Américo wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> > >
> > > However, it is not completely clear to me where the boundary is
> > > between
> > > RTL and FCL. Classes is listed under FCL, and is documented under
> > > RTL.
> >
> >
> > Classes is RTL. I will update the web page.
>
> At least in subversion fixes branch, classes unit is present in both fcl and
> rtl trees (flc.classes seems outdated).
>
> I think that, for clarity sake, fcl.classes should be removed since the only
> objective, AFAIK, of keeping it in fcl was portability beetween 1.0.x and dev
> branch.
Yes. I forgot to merge that, this is done now.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
