Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
[..]
However, it is not completely clear to me where the boundary is between
RTL and FCL. Classes is listed under FCL, and is documented under RTL.
Classes is RTL. I will update the web page.
At least in subversion fixes branch, classes unit is present in both fcl
and rtl trees (flc.classes seems outdated).
I think that, for clarity sake, fcl.classes should be removed since the
only objective, AFAIK, of keeping it in fcl was portability beetween
1.0.x and dev branch.
Luiz
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
