>> Delphi is still better performing, but there is not much chance that
> Delphi
>> will see any improvement in this field.
>
> The Delphi compiler does not even support MMX, 3Dnow or any other enhanced
> instruction sets (except through the built-in assembler). Does FPC's code
> generator support
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that, with FPC 1.9.4, the (default) calling convention
> "register" depends on the fact that a routine is or is not embedded
> in an other routine.
>
> With "proc(A,B,C: Longint);", if "proc" is not embedded then
> eax = A, edx = B and ecx = C but if "proc" is embedded then e
> Delphi is still better performing, but there is not much chance that
Delphi
> will see any improvement in this field.
The Delphi compiler does not even support MMX, 3Dnow or any other enhanced
instruction sets (except through the built-in assembler). Does FPC's code
generator support the use of
Hello,
I noticed that, with FPC 1.9.4, the (default) calling convention
"register" depends on the fact that a routine is or is not embedded
in an other routine.
With "proc(A,B,C: Longint);", if "proc" is not embedded then
eax = A, edx = B and ecx = C but if "proc" is embedded then edx = A,
ecx =
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:57:28 +0200 (CEST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Applied.
> >
> > Michael.
> Thanks.
>
> If the following patch is applied, make install works on win32. ATM, Dbf_Wtil is not
> compiled on win32, but make install wants
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:57:28 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Applied.
>
> Michael.
Thanks.
If the following patch is applied, make install works on win32. ATM, Dbf_Wtil is not
compiled on win32, but make install wants to install it. With this patch it is
compiled on win32 too.
Index
> Although I've enquired about RTF, I would really like to use PDF. Are
> there any free pascal units for this?
The traditional way is to ouput LateX code, and compile it to PDF with
pdflatex.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lis
