Re: [fpc-pascal]no ppu installation with fpcmake

2004-03-02 Thread Peter Vreman
> Hi! > > I'm new to this list and have a lot of questions waiting, so be patient > please. ;) > > The first one: > > I wrote a Makefile.fpc that is working fine. The only thing i can't > achieve is to leave out the *.ppu files when installing. > > My goal is to install only the program and some da

Re: [fpc-pascal]fpcmake and capital letter filenames

2004-03-02 Thread Peter Vreman
> Hi again! > > Apparently fpcmake has no idea of handling file names with capitals in > them. I use those names for having better readability and sorting > issues. > > When the target clean is used, none of the files with capitals is > deleted (.ppu, .o). > > I know how to write my own clean targe

Re: [fpc-pascal]Findfirst and symbolics links

2004-03-02 Thread Peter Vreman
> Thanks... ! > > That patch can be applied to the fpc 1.0.4 source ? > There is any other workaround to the problem ? I don't think it, the Unix RTL is different. But ofcourse you can do patch it manual. See the fpc-devel mailinglist archives for the patch. __

[fpc-pascal]SQLite Header File

2004-03-02 Thread Taj Morton
Hi! I'm looking for a new header file for SQLite...the old one included with FPC 1.0.3 doesn't seem to work (program dies with: Creating class Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-minimal.c: 134: realloc: Assertion `ptr == alloc_last_block' failed!) Any idea where I can get a new one? Thanks! --

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael A. Hess
Michael A. Hess wrote: .. I'll drop back to the 1.0.10. Installed 1.0.10 and it built everything just hunky dory. Now I have a question about the size of the exe. After it is built the size is 1.3 meg. I tried to run stripw on it but it doesn't reduce it at all. Did the file really jump to that

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:03:16 +0100 (CET) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > Fixed. > > Thanks, but ATM fpwritetga.pp doesn't compile, due to missing KeyIndentification > and FromWord in TFPWriterTarga.SaveHeader And again fixed... This is b

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:03:16 +0100 (CET) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Fixed. Thanks, but ATM fpwritetga.pp doesn't compile, due to missing KeyIndentification and FromWord in TFPWriterTarga.SaveHeader Regards, Vincent. ___ fpc-pascal maillist -

[fpc-pascal]no ppu installation with fpcmake

2004-03-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Hi! I'm new to this list and have a lot of questions waiting, so be patient please. ;) The first one: I wrote a Makefile.fpc that is working fine. The only thing i can't achieve is to leave out the *.ppu files when installing. My goal is to install only the program and some data and readme but

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Vincent Snijders wrote: > On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:19:24 -0500 > kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > went so far as to completely reinstall 1.0.10 just to be on the safe > > side, and i'm still getting the same error I was w/ the cvs compiler i > > had been using ... >

[fpc-pascal]fpcmake and capital letter filenames

2004-03-02 Thread Marc Santhoff
Hi again! Apparently fpcmake has no idea of handling file names with capitals in them. I use those names for having better readability and sorting issues. When the target clean is used, none of the files with capitals is deleted (.ppu, .o). I know how to write my own clean target, but maybe ther

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:19:24 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > went so far as to completely reinstall 1.0.10 just to be on the safe > side, and i'm still getting the same error I was w/ the cvs compiler i > had been using ... > > make -C image clean > Makefile:154: *** The Makefile doe

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
Vincent Snijders wrote: On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh,

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
Vincent Snijders wrote: On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh,

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Vincent Snijders
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:48:25 -0500 kractor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >These are known problems. > >You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. > >Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. > > > > > oh, so if i've al

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread kractor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. oh, so if i've already built / installed cvs version, then have to remove that and re-install 1.0.10 to build

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Michael A. Hess wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > These are known problems. > > You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. > > Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. > > H. I was trying the same thing last week

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael A. Hess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These are known problems. You must start with a 1.0.10 compiler when you create a new 1.9.X compiler. Some older (even quite recent) 1.9.x versions won't work. H. I was trying the same thing last week before my Win32 system crashed and was getting similar problems when

Re: [fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael . VanCanneyt
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Michael A. Hess wrote: > Greetings, > > I have been trying to cycle a new Win32 compiler so that I can make a > complete Lazarus distro which includes the compiler. > > I have the 1.9.2 binary release and am trying to cycle a new compiler > from CVS code. It fails at vari

[fpc-pascal]Can't seem to cycle a new compiler

2004-03-02 Thread Michael A. Hess
Greetings, I have been trying to cycle a new Win32 compiler so that I can make a complete Lazarus distro which includes the compiler. I have the 1.9.2 binary release and am trying to cycle a new compiler from CVS code. It fails at various points. First it fails at rtl/win32/dos.pp not knowing

Re: [fpc-pascal]Findfirst and symbolics links

2004-03-02 Thread Inpromptu
Thanks... ! That patch can be applied to the fpc 1.0.4 source ? There is any other workaround to the problem ? > At 19:05 2-3-2004, you wrote: > >Hi > > > >How do I know if a file returned by findfirst is a real file or a symbolic > >link ? > > Use stat() (fpStat() in 1.9.x). There is a patch s

Re: [fpc-pascal]Findfirst and symbolics links

2004-03-02 Thread Peter Vreman
At 19:05 2-3-2004, you wrote: Hi How do I know if a file returned by findfirst is a real file or a symbolic link ? Use stat() (fpStat() in 1.9.x). There is a patch supplied to add a Mode field to TSearchRec, but that is not applied yet. Peter ___ fpc

[fpc-pascal]Findfirst and symbolics links

2004-03-02 Thread Inpromptu
Hi How do I know if a file returned by findfirst is a real file or a symbolic link ? Thanks -- _ Web-based SMS services available at http://www.operamail.com. >From your mailbox to local or overseas cell phones. Powered by Outblaze _