Re: [Foundation-l] Commons:Sexual content

2010-05-11 Thread Andre Engels
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Noein wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/05/2010 05:51, Andre Engels wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning wrote: >>> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: Being educational should be ju

Re: [Foundation-l] Commons:Sexual content

2010-05-10 Thread Noein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/05/2010 05:51, Andre Engels wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: >>> Being educational should be just another word for being in scope, and >>> in scope are,

Re: [Foundation-l] Commons:Sexual content

2010-05-10 Thread Andre Engels
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: >> Being educational should be just another word for being in scope, and >> in scope are, in my opinion, in the first place those files that are >> usable for the projects. That is t

Re: [Foundation-l] Commons:Sexual content

2010-05-09 Thread Kim Bruning
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: > Being educational should be just another word for being in scope, and > in scope are, in my opinion, in the first place those files that are > usable for the projects. That is the first thing that we should be > judging things by. I'v

Re: [Foundation-l] Commons:Sexual content

2010-05-09 Thread Andre Engels
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Adam Cuerden wrote: > Okay, I've complained a lot, time to give something back. > > I think I've managed to create a sexual content policy that's > consistent with the core values of commons and previous decisions, > such as the artworks of Muhammed,  while dealing