-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/05/2010 05:51, Andre Engels wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Kim Bruning <k...@bruning.xs4all.nl> wrote: >> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Andre Engels wrote: >>> Being educational should be just another word for being in scope, and >>> in scope are, in my opinion, in the first place those files that are >>> usable for the projects. That is the first thing that we should be >>> judging things by. >> >> I've already emphasized that a bit already on the page, but more from >> the WARNING angle. > > That only says that pictures that are _used_ should not be deleted > indiscriminately. Used and usable are not the same. > >> Could you edit or comment on the page in a way that reflects what you >> just stated? :-) > > Hardly. The page as it is now seems to go from the point of view that > we should not host any pornography, then restricts itself by trying to > get a narrow definition of 'pornography'. For me, whether or not > something is pornographic is at best a secondary issue. >
Then would the http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Censorship page be more appropriate? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL6Eo5AAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6LUW8IAIRl3uSV0wHZ3GP7hUCrWwuR CEeJnjKuVKW+mIlXfvViUuZIAKiCkNxAgPzxajxf4ng0rn89O/Kz/yZQVlRh1lQe IaVJUr3C0QSlvp6+Eo8yhwSCMxgV4XBHlkB4w2BeaIIvebFVxJMaASyP0ujy9CrF E6GPEgODy/HLVlEXTV+1qjtp3jgTmwJSHHkUB0PnRhO+Lsm8NzUl26aq/9zouxIw grSmmdNyXkTb+QkopMSPh8p27K5rcq9NpiLMIAu9pMguaM0E/XMiCADobajLJ/vv ex4E3RpUayNrP163tjAzJSHOPnKn9aKPjy9rJ70StAS3n9S3si9P9c1pTdQFISE= =R83f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l